Bank of America strategist warns mega IPOs could push tech weighting past bubble-era levels
SpaceX and OpenAI listings could drive technology's share of equity benchmarks above 48%, triggering forced buying by passive funds.
Bank of America Corporation (BAC) price
Full chart and statsLoading chart…
- Last close
- $51
- Close-to-close change
- +0.6%
- Market cap
- $357.6B (shares as of 2026-07-30)
- P/E (trailing)
- 11.8 (EPS to 2026-06-30)
- Annual revenue
- $113.1B USD (FY ended 2025-12-31) 10-K
- Annual revenue growth
- +6.8% (FY ended 2025-12-31 vs FY ended 2024-12-31) 10-K
- Annual net income
- 30,509,000,000 USD (FY ended 2025-12-31, attributable to the company) 10-K
- Annual operating margin
- Unavailable
- Forward P/E
- Unavailable: no dated forecast source
Gloria daily close for session Oct 29, 2026. Market cap and trailing P/E use this close with the SEC share total and trailing diluted earnings, each dated next to its figure. Annual revenue, revenue growth, net income and margin show their own fiscal period and link the 10-K. Current context may postdate this article.
Bank of America Corporation and its peers
| Company | Price | Market cap | P/E (trailing) | Forward P/E | Annual revenue (USD) | Annual revenue growth | Annual net income (USD) | Operating margin |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
$51 | $357.6B | 11.8 | Unavailable | $113.1BFY ended 2025-12-31 · 10-K | +6.8%FY ended 2025-12-31 vs 2024-12-31 · 10-K | 30,509,000,000FY ended 2025-12-31, attributable to the company · 10-K | Unavailable |
|
|
$85 | $254.6B | 12.0 | Unavailable | $83.7BFY ended 2025-12-31 · 10-K | +1.7%FY ended 2025-12-31 vs 2024-12-31 · 10-K | 21,338,000,000FY ended 2025-12-31, attributable to the company · 10-K | Unavailable |
|
|
$126 | $211.0B | 13.6 | Unavailable | $85.2BFY ended 2025-12-31 · 10-K | +5.6%FY ended 2025-12-31 vs 2024-12-31 · 10-K | 14,306,000,000FY ended 2025-12-31, attributable to the company · 10-K | Unavailable |
|
|
$344 | $913.3B | 14.7 | Unavailable | $182.4BFY ended 2025-12-31 · 10-K | +2.8%FY ended 2025-12-31 vs 2024-12-31 · 10-K | 57,048,000,000FY ended 2025-12-31, attributable to the company · 10-K | Unavailable |
Missing figures stay unavailable. Forward P/E requires a dated source. Annual revenue, revenue growth, net income and margin come from each company's own 10-K, in US dollars, and each row shows that fiscal year. Revenue growth compares the fiscal year with the prior year stated in the same 10-K. Net income is the full year amount attributable to the company, or available to common stockholders where the filing states only that, or consolidated net income. Each row names its basis. Trailing P/E reads "Not meaningful" when the dated trailing diluted EPS is a loss or zero. An operating margin appears only when the filing states both the operating income and the revenue for the same year.
Sources: SEC filings, Gloria daily closes and CoinGecko. Oldest record refresh: Oct 29, 2026, 1:46 PM EDT. Refresh is not a price or filing date. Each row shows its price date and its annual fiscal period. Peers use industry code and company size, or editorial selection. Market cap multiplies that row price by the company share total the latest SEC filing states for every share class together. Trailing P/E divides it by trailing diluted earnings from SEC filings. Rolled earnings per share are approximate because share counts can change between periods. Both appear only when the SEC data carries its date, so they are estimates at one price date, not synchronized filing valuations. Not investment advice.
Bank of America’s chief investment strategist Michael Hartnett warned on May 22 that anticipated mega-IPOs from SpaceX and OpenAI could push technology’s weighting in major equity benchmarks like the S&P 500 beyond 48%. That’s a threshold he associates with historical market bubbles.
The numbers behind the warning
SpaceX has filed its S-1, targeting a valuation north of $1.75 trillion. The company aims to raise up to $75 billion in what would be one of the largest IPOs ever, with a potential Nasdaq debut in June.
Meanwhile, OpenAI is preparing a confidential IPO filing. Its most recent private valuation hit $830 billion following a $120 billion investment round.
Hartnett drew explicit comparisons to the Roaring ’20s and the Nifty Fifty era, periods when investor enthusiasm about a narrow set of stocks created concentration levels that eventually unwound painfully.
The passive fund problem
If SpaceX and OpenAI are rapidly included in benchmark indices after their listings, passive funds would be required to purchase large amounts of shares in a compressed timeframe. That forced buying amplifies demand regardless of valuation, pushing prices higher and, by extension, increasing tech’s overall weighting even further.
The news moving money, markets, and the world—before your day starts.
Daily. Free. Join 34,000+ readers across crypto, finance, and policy.
The current tech weighting in the S&P 500 is already elevated by historical standards. Adding two mega-cap entrants with combined valuations exceeding $2.5 trillion would concentrate the index further in a sector that already dominates it. Past the 48% level Hartnett flagged, you’re in territory that hasn’t been seen outside of bubble conditions.
Why crypto investors should pay attention
OpenAI’s IPO sits directly at the intersection of AI and technology, a narrative that has driven significant capital flows into AI-related crypto tokens over the past two years. A public market debut that prices OpenAI at $830 billion or higher could either validate those token valuations or expose the gap between hype and revenue.
SpaceX’s listing creates a new publicly tradable vehicle for exposure to Elon Musk’s empire. Historically, Musk-adjacent assets, including Dogecoin and other meme tokens, have shown sensitivity to developments in his business portfolio.
If passive funds are forced to allocate billions toward two new mega-cap listings, that capital comes from somewhere. Massive equity market events can temporarily starve alternative assets of inflows.
Disclosure: This article was edited by Editorial Team. For more information on how we create and review content, see our Editorial Policy.
More in News
See all-
Ledger launches $849 phone like crypto wallet following chip implant attack
-
Fed minutes show most officials favored another rate hike by year end
-
Standard Chartered is building an institutional research universe for DeFi
-
Bitwise brings first spot NEAR ETF to US investors
-
Anthropic launches Claude Opus 5 with near Fable performance at half the price
-
Paul Atkins outlines SEC plans for crypto, tokenization and public markets in 2026

