Nexo Earn with Nexo
Kelp DAO hit by $292M bridge hack draining rsETH reserves, Aave freezes affected markets

Kelp DAO hit by $292M bridge hack draining rsETH reserves, Aave freezes affected markets

The attack has become the top DeFi exploit this year in scale.

Liquid restaking protocol Kelp DAO faced a large-scale attack that caused roughly $292 million in damages and triggered spillover disruption impacting the Aave lending protocol.

The exploit was first flagged by blockchain investigator ZachXBT at approximately 2:52 PM on April 18.

The attacker manipulated LayerZero’s cross-chain messaging layer, the verification system that confirms legitimate instructions between networks, into believing a valid transfer request had arrived from another chain.

The spoofed message triggered the unauthorized transfer of 116,500 rsETH, Kelp DAO’s Liquid Restaking Token, worth about $292 million, on-chain data shows.

The exploited amount represents around 18% of rsETH’s total circulating supply of approximately 630,000 tokens.

Kelp DAO confirmed on X that it had activated emergency safeguards and immediately stopped rsETH deposits and withdrawals, and is coordinating with LayerZero and Unichain.

Where the stolen rsETH went

The incident escalated as stolen funds were moved into lending protocols including Aave V3, Compound V3, and Euler, where the attacker borrowed large amounts of wrapped ETH against collateral, building more than $236 million in debt positions.

On-chain data shows the attacker consolidated around 74,000 ETH post-exploit, generating over $280 million in bad debt across protocols.

In response, AAV suspended the rsETH markets on both Aave V3 and Aave V4. The project confirmed that its smart contracts were not compromised and that the issue originated from rsETH.

Aave also began reviewing rsETH-backed loans opened after the exploit to evaluate potential exposure. The team said they would explore measures to address any resulting bad debt.

SparkLend and Fluid took identical steps, with SparkLend reporting zero rsETH exposure and crediting its conservative risk posture.

Lido Finance paused deposits into its earnETH product, which carries rsETH exposure, while saying its core staking protocol and the stETH token were completely uninvolved.

Ethena, the stablecoin issuer, temporarily shut down its own LayerZero bridges from the Ethereum mainnet as a precaution despite having no rsETH exposure and maintaining over 101% collateralization.

Aave’s token dropped about 10% on news of the attack, per CoinGecko.

A brutal stretch for DeFi

The attack is the largest DeFi exploit of the year to date and it came weeks after Solana-based perpetuals protocol Drift Protocol was hit in a targeted administrative breach.

On April 1, Drift lost about $285 million in an attack later linked to North Korea-affiliated actors. At least a dozen smaller protocols have been hit in the weeks since, including CoW Swap, Zerion, Rhea Finance, and Silo Finance.

Disclosure: This article was edited by Vivian Nguyen. For more information on how we create and review content, see our Editorial Policy.

Kelp DAO hit by $292M bridge hack draining rsETH reserves, Aave freezes affected markets

Kelp DAO hit by $292M bridge hack draining rsETH reserves, Aave freezes affected markets

The attack has become the top DeFi exploit this year in scale.

Liquid restaking protocol Kelp DAO faced a large-scale attack that caused roughly $292 million in damages and triggered spillover disruption impacting the Aave lending protocol.

The exploit was first flagged by blockchain investigator ZachXBT at approximately 2:52 PM on April 18.

The attacker manipulated LayerZero’s cross-chain messaging layer, the verification system that confirms legitimate instructions between networks, into believing a valid transfer request had arrived from another chain.

The spoofed message triggered the unauthorized transfer of 116,500 rsETH, Kelp DAO’s Liquid Restaking Token, worth about $292 million, on-chain data shows.

The exploited amount represents around 18% of rsETH’s total circulating supply of approximately 630,000 tokens.

Kelp DAO confirmed on X that it had activated emergency safeguards and immediately stopped rsETH deposits and withdrawals, and is coordinating with LayerZero and Unichain.

Where the stolen rsETH went

The incident escalated as stolen funds were moved into lending protocols including Aave V3, Compound V3, and Euler, where the attacker borrowed large amounts of wrapped ETH against collateral, building more than $236 million in debt positions.

On-chain data shows the attacker consolidated around 74,000 ETH post-exploit, generating over $280 million in bad debt across protocols.

In response, AAV suspended the rsETH markets on both Aave V3 and Aave V4. The project confirmed that its smart contracts were not compromised and that the issue originated from rsETH.

Aave also began reviewing rsETH-backed loans opened after the exploit to evaluate potential exposure. The team said they would explore measures to address any resulting bad debt.

SparkLend and Fluid took identical steps, with SparkLend reporting zero rsETH exposure and crediting its conservative risk posture.

Lido Finance paused deposits into its earnETH product, which carries rsETH exposure, while saying its core staking protocol and the stETH token were completely uninvolved.

Ethena, the stablecoin issuer, temporarily shut down its own LayerZero bridges from the Ethereum mainnet as a precaution despite having no rsETH exposure and maintaining over 101% collateralization.

Aave’s token dropped about 10% on news of the attack, per CoinGecko.

A brutal stretch for DeFi

The attack is the largest DeFi exploit of the year to date and it came weeks after Solana-based perpetuals protocol Drift Protocol was hit in a targeted administrative breach.

On April 1, Drift lost about $285 million in an attack later linked to North Korea-affiliated actors. At least a dozen smaller protocols have been hit in the weeks since, including CoW Swap, Zerion, Rhea Finance, and Silo Finance.

Disclosure: This article was edited by Vivian Nguyen. For more information on how we create and review content, see our Editorial Policy.