Sen. Lummis calls for criminal investigation into banks debanking Trump
The Wyoming senator accuses major US banks of politically motivated account closures targeting the Trump family and crypto firms
JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) price
Full chart and statsLoading chart…
- Last close
- $336
- Close-to-close change
- +0.5%
- Market cap
- $892.6B (shares as of 2026-06-30)
- P/E (trailing)
- 14.4 (EPS to 2026-06-30)
- Annual revenue
- $182.4B USD (FY ended 2025-12-31) 10-K
- Annual revenue growth
- +2.8% (FY ended 2025-12-31 vs FY ended 2024-12-31) 10-K
- Annual net income
- 57,048,000,000 USD (FY ended 2025-12-31, attributable to the company) 10-K
- Annual operating margin
- Unavailable
- Forward P/E
- Unavailable: no dated forecast source
Gloria daily close for session Oct 27, 2026. Market cap and trailing P/E use this close with the SEC share total and trailing diluted earnings, each dated next to its figure. Annual revenue, revenue growth, net income and margin show their own fiscal period and link the 10-K. Current context may postdate this article.
JPMorgan Chase & Co. and its peers
| Company | Price | Market cap | P/E (trailing) | Forward P/E | Annual revenue (USD) | Annual revenue growth | Annual net income (USD) | Operating margin |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
$336 | $892.6B | 14.4 | Unavailable | $182.4BFY ended 2025-12-31 · 10-K | +2.8%FY ended 2025-12-31 vs 2024-12-31 · 10-K | 57,048,000,000FY ended 2025-12-31, attributable to the company · 10-K | Unavailable |
|
|
$51 | $354.4B | 11.7 | Unavailable | $113.1BFY ended 2025-12-31 · 10-K | +6.8%FY ended 2025-12-31 vs 2024-12-31 · 10-K | 30,509,000,000FY ended 2025-12-31, attributable to the company · 10-K | Unavailable |
|
|
$83 | $250.0B | 12.0 | Unavailable | $83.7BFY ended 2025-12-31 · 10-K | +1.7%FY ended 2025-12-31 vs 2024-12-31 · 10-K | 21,338,000,000FY ended 2025-12-31, attributable to the company · 10-K | Unavailable |
|
|
$123 | $205.8B | 13.2 | Unavailable | $85.2BFY ended 2025-12-31 · 10-K | +5.6%FY ended 2025-12-31 vs 2024-12-31 · 10-K | 14,306,000,000FY ended 2025-12-31, attributable to the company · 10-K | Unavailable |
Missing figures stay unavailable. Forward P/E requires a dated source. Annual revenue, revenue growth, net income and margin come from each company's own 10-K, in US dollars, and each row shows that fiscal year. Revenue growth compares the fiscal year with the prior year stated in the same 10-K. Net income is the full year amount attributable to the company, or available to common stockholders where the filing states only that, or consolidated net income. Each row names its basis. Trailing P/E reads "Not meaningful" when the dated trailing diluted EPS is a loss or zero. An operating margin appears only when the filing states both the operating income and the revenue for the same year.
Sources: SEC filings, Gloria daily closes and CoinGecko. Oldest record refresh: Oct 27, 2026, 9:36 PM EDT. Refresh is not a price or filing date. Each row shows its price date and its annual fiscal period. Peers use industry code and company size, or editorial selection. Market cap multiplies that row price by the company share total the latest SEC filing states for every share class together. Trailing P/E divides it by trailing diluted earnings from SEC filings. Rolled earnings per share are approximate because share counts can change between periods. Both appear only when the SEC data carries its date, so they are estimates at one price date, not synchronized filing valuations. Not investment advice.
Senator Cynthia Lummis is escalating her war against what she sees as the banking industry’s worst habit: picking and choosing customers based on politics. The Wyoming Republican is calling for a criminal investigation into major US banks that she says systematically debanked President Donald Trump, his family members, and digital asset companies for purely political reasons.
The debanking dossier
On January 31, 2026, she laid out the scope of what she considers a coordinated campaign against the Trump orbit.
“Donald Trump, the president, was debanked… Eric Trump was debanked… Donald Trump Jr. was debanked… Melania was debanked… Digital asset firms all over the country were debanked.”
The senator frames these individual incidents as part of a broader pattern she and other Republicans have labeled “Operation Choke Point 2.0.” The original Operation Choke Point was an Obama-era initiative that pressured banks to cut ties with legal but politically disfavored industries like payday lenders and firearms dealers. The sequel, critics argue, targeted crypto companies and political opponents of the Biden administration with the same playbook.
The House Financial Services Committee published a report on November 30, 2025, alleging that the Biden administration facilitated the debanking of digital asset businesses through regulatory pressure on banks. In English: regulators didn’t explicitly order banks to drop crypto clients, but they allegedly made it clear that keeping those clients would invite unwanted scrutiny.
In November 2025, JPMorgan Chase closed accounts belonging to Jack Mallers, the CEO of Strike, a Bitcoin payments company. Lummis responded by declaring that “Operation Choke Point 2.0 regrettably lives on.”
Federal machinery starts turning
By June 2026, US Attorney Jeanine Pirro had issued subpoenas to major banks including JPMorgan and Bank of America as part of an investigation into alleged targeted debanking practices.
The news moving money, markets, and the world—before your day starts.
Daily. Free. Join 34,000+ readers across crypto, finance, and policy.
President Trump has filed lawsuits against JPMorgan and Capital One, alleging that the banks closed accounts associated with him and his family for political reasons. The account closures reportedly occurred after January 6, 2021.
Trump signed the “Guaranteeing Fair Banking for All Americans” Executive Order on August 7, 2025. The order mandates that regulators address politicized debanking, with review timelines that were set for December 2025.
Lummis, who chairs the Senate Banking Subcommittee on Digital Assets, has positioned herself at the intersection of these efforts. She has drawn explicit connections between the debanking of political figures and the broader challenges facing the cryptocurrency ecosystem.
Legislative response takes shape
Beyond investigations and lawsuits, Lummis is pushing for structural changes. She has proposed the CLARITY Act, legislation aimed at providing regulatory certainty for digital asset firms and preventing the kind of ambiguous regulatory pressure that allegedly enabled debanking in the first place.
What this means for crypto investors
Investors should watch two things closely: the progress of the CLARITY Act through committee and the results of Pirro’s investigation into the banks. If those investigations reveal documented evidence of coordinated, politically motivated account closures, the resulting fallout could reshape the banking industry’s relationship with both crypto and with politically exposed persons more broadly.
Disclosure: This article was edited by Editorial Team. For more information on how we create and review content, see our Editorial Policy.

