Meta’s Brain2Qwerty brings non-invasive brain-to-text decoding closer to reality
The AI model translates brain signals into typed text without surgery, but significant hurdles remain before it works in real time
Meta Platforms Inc. (META) price
Full chart and statsLoading chart…
- Last close
- $620
- Close-to-close change
- −1.6%
- Market cap
- $1.6T (all share classes as of 2026-10-16) cover page
- P/E (trailing)
- 21.2 (EPS to 2026-09-30)
- Annual revenue
- $201.0B USD (FY ended 2025-12-31) 10-K
- Annual revenue growth
- +22.2% (FY ended 2025-12-31 vs FY ended 2024-12-31) 10-K
- Annual net income
- 60,458,000,000 USD (FY ended 2025-12-31, attributable to the company) 10-K
- Annual operating margin
- 41.4% (FY ended 2025-12-31)
- Forward P/E
- Unavailable: no dated forecast source
Gloria daily close for session Oct 27, 2026. Market cap and trailing P/E use this close with the SEC share total and trailing diluted earnings, each dated next to its figure. Annual revenue, revenue growth, net income and margin show their own fiscal period and link the 10-K. Current context may postdate this article.
Meta Platforms Inc. and its peers
| Company | Price | Market cap | P/E (trailing) | Forward P/E | Annual revenue (USD) | Annual revenue growth | Annual net income (USD) | Operating margin |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
$620 | $1.6T | 21.2 | Unavailable | $201.0BFY ended 2025-12-31 · 10-K | +22.2%FY ended 2025-12-31 vs 2024-12-31 · 10-K | 60,458,000,000FY ended 2025-12-31, attributable to the company · 10-K | 41.4%FY ended 2025-12-31 |
|
|
$317 | $3.9T | 15.9 | Unavailable | $402.8BFY ended 2025-12-31 · 10-K | +15.1%FY ended 2025-12-31 vs 2024-12-31 · 10-K | 132,170,000,000FY ended 2025-12-31, attributable to the company · 10-K | 32.0%FY ended 2025-12-31 |
|
|
$321 | $3.9T | 16.1 | Unavailable | $402.8BFY ended 2025-12-31 · 10-K | +15.1%FY ended 2025-12-31 vs 2024-12-31 · 10-K | 132,170,000,000FY ended 2025-12-31, attributable to the company · 10-K | 32.0%FY ended 2025-12-31 |
|
|
$263 | $88.1B | 20.2 | Unavailable | $5.5BFY ended 2025-12-31 · 10-K | +70.0%FY ended 2025-12-31 vs 2024-12-31 · 10-K | 3,333,751,000FY ended 2025-12-31, attributable to the company · 10-K | 75.8%FY ended 2025-12-31 |
Missing figures stay unavailable. Forward P/E requires a dated source. Annual revenue, revenue growth, net income and margin come from each company's own 10-K, in US dollars, and each row shows that fiscal year. Revenue growth compares the fiscal year with the prior year stated in the same 10-K. Net income is the full year amount attributable to the company, or available to common stockholders where the filing states only that, or consolidated net income. Each row names its basis. Trailing P/E reads "Not meaningful" when the dated trailing diluted EPS is a loss or zero. An operating margin appears only when the filing states both the operating income and the revenue for the same year.
Sources: SEC filings, Gloria daily closes and CoinGecko. Oldest record refresh: Oct 28, 2026, 4:51 PM EDT. Refresh is not a price or filing date. Each row shows its price date and its annual fiscal period. Peers use industry code and company size, or editorial selection. Market cap multiplies that row price by the company share total the latest SEC filing states for every share class together. Trailing P/E divides it by trailing diluted earnings from SEC filings. Rolled earnings per share are approximate because share counts can change between periods. Both appear only when the SEC data carries its date, so they are estimates at one price date, not synchronized filing valuations. Not investment advice.
Token vs underlying stock
Current comparison for META. Historical observations may postdate this article.
METAx token unit vs META share · USD
+5.4% over displayed period
● METAx token┄ META stock: $620.19
Source: CoinGecko + Gloria · Retrieved Oct 28, 22:15 UTC · Delayed
Methodology and data
Split-adjusted regular-session stock closes from the existing Gloria shared history, paired only with an observed token price within 45 minutes of 16:00 New York time. Up to 60 matched sessions. No interpolation or missing-date fill. Weekends and known early closes are omitted. Token units are not adjusted for issuer multipliers or dividend treatment. This compares quoted prices, not fair value, executable premiums or arbitrage returns. Solid line: token. Dashed line: stock. Exact quote times and values appear below. Historical observations. Retrieval refers to the token source. Token quote times use UTC. The fixed cohort shows its oldest member fetch.
| Date (UTC) | Token (USD) | Stock close (USD) | Token quote (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-08-04 | 589.37 | 587.94 | 2026-08-04 20:00 |
| 2026-08-05 | 590.76 | 588.77 | 2026-08-05 20:00 |
| 2026-08-06 | 589.91 | 589.90 | 2026-08-06 20:00 |
| 2026-08-07 | 592.96 | 592.10 | 2026-08-07 20:00 |
| 2026-08-10 | 595.64 | 594.92 | 2026-08-10 20:00 |
| 2026-08-11 | 600.42 | 599.12 | 2026-08-11 20:00 |
| 2026-08-12 | 580.52 | 578.85 | 2026-08-12 20:00 |
| 2026-08-13 | 595.84 | 594.97 | 2026-08-13 20:00 |
| 2026-08-14 | 590.73 | 589.85 | 2026-08-14 20:00 |
| 2026-08-17 | 569.77 | 568.97 | 2026-08-17 20:00 |
| 2026-08-18 | 544.97 | 543.67 | 2026-08-18 20:00 |
| 2026-08-19 | 547.78 | 546.03 | 2026-08-19 20:00 |
| 2026-08-20 | 547.56 | 545.83 | 2026-08-20 20:00 |
| 2026-08-21 | 551.35 | 549.90 | 2026-08-21 20:00 |
| 2026-08-24 | 560.74 | 559.02 | 2026-08-24 20:00 |
| 2026-08-25 | 571.26 | 570.05 | 2026-08-25 20:00 |
| 2026-08-26 | 577.62 | 576.14 | 2026-08-26 20:00 |
| 2026-08-27 | 572.41 | 571.10 | 2026-08-27 20:00 |
| 2026-08-28 | 579.18 | 578.02 | 2026-08-28 20:00 |
| 2026-08-31 | 573.08 | 572.34 | 2026-08-31 20:00 |
| 2026-09-01 | 579.55 | 578.54 | 2026-09-01 20:00 |
| 2026-09-02 | 593.44 | 592.85 | 2026-09-02 20:00 |
| 2026-09-03 | 612.22 | 610.68 | 2026-09-03 20:00 |
| 2026-09-04 | 617.78 | 616.77 | 2026-09-04 20:00 |
| 2026-09-08 | 614.55 | 613.48 | 2026-09-08 20:00 |
| 2026-09-09 | 653.99 | 653.69 | 2026-09-09 20:00 |
| 2026-09-10 | 645.68 | 644.38 | 2026-09-10 20:00 |
| 2026-09-11 | 648.82 | 648.03 | 2026-09-11 20:00 |
| 2026-09-14 | 667.33 | 665.60 | 2026-09-14 20:00 |
| 2026-09-15 | 671.72 | 670.24 | 2026-09-15 20:00 |
| 2026-09-16 | 674.78 | 673.31 | 2026-09-16 20:00 |
| 2026-09-17 | 683.69 | 682.31 | 2026-09-17 20:00 |
| 2026-09-18 | 667.45 | 665.75 | 2026-09-18 20:00 |
| 2026-09-21 | 743.56 | 741.25 | 2026-09-21 20:00 |
| 2026-09-22 | 740.44 | 736.60 | 2026-09-22 20:00 |
| 2026-09-23 | 746.35 | 744.10 | 2026-09-23 20:00 |
| 2026-09-24 | 778.30 | 777.59 | 2026-09-24 20:00 |
| 2026-09-25 | 752.94 | 751.66 | 2026-09-25 20:00 |
| 2026-09-28 | 716.77 | 715.62 | 2026-09-28 20:00 |
| 2026-09-29 | 741.08 | 738.79 | 2026-09-29 20:00 |
| 2026-09-30 | 728.60 | 725.18 | 2026-09-30 20:00 |
| 2026-10-01 | 727.20 | 725.93 | 2026-10-01 20:00 |
| 2026-10-02 | 729.17 | 728.08 | 2026-10-02 20:00 |
| 2026-10-05 | 743.97 | 741.90 | 2026-10-05 20:00 |
| 2026-10-06 | 741.44 | 738.88 | 2026-10-06 20:00 |
| 2026-10-07 | 722.75 | 721.31 | 2026-10-07 20:00 |
| 2026-10-08 | 722.91 | 720.89 | 2026-10-08 20:00 |
| 2026-10-09 | 720.22 | 718.67 | 2026-10-09 20:00 |
| 2026-10-12 | 744.29 | 742.96 | 2026-10-12 20:00 |
| 2026-10-13 | 764.47 | 762.50 | 2026-10-13 20:00 |
| 2026-10-14 | 737.37 | 737.54 | 2026-10-14 20:00 |
| 2026-10-15 | 738.03 | 736.72 | 2026-10-15 20:00 |
| 2026-10-16 | 711.14 | 709.33 | 2026-10-16 20:00 |
| 2026-10-19 | 707.00 | 705.44 | 2026-10-19 20:00 |
| 2026-10-20 | 695.35 | 694.25 | 2026-10-20 20:00 |
| 2026-10-21 | 700.90 | 697.52 | 2026-10-21 20:00 |
| 2026-10-22 | 650.24 | 648.85 | 2026-10-22 20:00 |
| 2026-10-23 | 643.78 | 642.62 | 2026-10-23 20:00 |
| 2026-10-26 | 631.24 | 630.56 | 2026-10-26 20:00 |
| 2026-10-27 | 621.46 | 620.19 | 2026-10-27 20:00 |
Stock history: Gloria · Retrieved Oct 28, 00:31 UTC. Token history: CoinGecko METAx.
Quoted token and share units can have different rights, multipliers and dividend treatment. This is not an executable premium or arbitrage signal.
Meta AI has built a system that can read your brain activity while you type and reconstruct the words you intended to write. No implants, no surgery, just a helmet covered in sensors. It’s called Brain2Qwerty, and it represents one of the most ambitious attempts to decode human language from non-invasive brain recordings.
The system, detailed in a paper published on February 6, 2025, achieved an average character error rate of 32% when using magnetoencephalography (MEG) sensors. In English: roughly one in three characters came out wrong. That sounds rough until you consider the alternative, EEG-based readings, which produced a 67% error rate. The best MEG participants hit a 19% character error rate.
How it actually works
Think of Brain2Qwerty like a three-stage translation pipeline for your brain’s electrical chatter.
First, a convolutional module analyzes 500-millisecond windows of brain signals. It’s essentially looking at tiny snapshots of neural activity and trying to identify patterns that correspond to finger movements and letter intentions.
Second, a transformer processes those patterns at the sentence level. Third, a pretrained language model refines the output at the character level. If your brain signals suggest “th_” followed by something ambiguous, the language model knows “the” is far more likely than “thq.”
The research involved 35 healthy volunteers who performed typing tasks while wearing MEG or EEG headsets. MEG machines are room-sized devices that cost millions of dollars and measure magnetic fields produced by brain activity. EEG caps are relatively cheap and portable but capture far noisier signals. The performance gap between the two, 32% vs. 67% error rate, reflects that tradeoff directly.
AI, tech, and the markets they move—in one daily briefing.
Daily. Free. Join 34,000+ readers across crypto, finance, and policy.
The real-time problem
The original Brain2Qwerty paper explicitly stated that the system does not operate in real time. The sentence-level processing architecture requires seeing an entire sequence before making predictions, which means you’d need to finish typing a sentence before the model could decode it.
The research team, which included collaborators from Paris Sciences et Lettres University and the Basque Center on Cognition, Brain and Language, positioned this work as a proof-of-concept rather than a finished product. They demonstrated that non-invasive brain recordings contain enough information to reconstruct typed language, even if extracting that information still requires significant post-processing.
This positioning matters because it sets Brain2Qwerty apart from invasive approaches like Neuralink. Elon Musk’s brain-chip company has demonstrated impressive real-time cursor control by implanting electrodes directly into brain tissue. Meta’s approach sacrifices performance for safety and accessibility.
What this means for investors
A 19% character error rate from the best participants using expensive MEG equipment is scientifically impressive. It is not commercially viable. The path from “works in a lab with a multi-million-dollar magnetometer” to “works on a consumer device” involves solving problems in sensor miniaturization, signal processing, and real-time computation.
For the crypto and digital asset space specifically, there is currently no observable connection between Brain2Qwerty’s research and blockchain technology, tokenized ecosystems, or decentralized protocols.
Disclosure: This article was edited by Editorial Team. For more information on how we create and review content, see our Editorial Policy.
More in Technology
See all-
Grass founder says network can’t keep up with AI data demand
-
AA-Robotics v0.1 puts frontier language models in charge of a robot arm
-
Microsoft CFO projects about $170 billion in capital expenditures this year
-
Wall Street moves past the Fed pause and back to tech earnings and AI
-
Perplexity taps OpenAI’s gpt-live-1 to power its voice mode
-
Microsoft Foundry passes 120,000 customers as revenue more than triples

