Nvidia’s Vera Rubin rack priced at $7.8M, nearly double the Blackwell generation
A 435% surge in memory costs is the biggest culprit behind the sticker shock on Nvidia's next-generation AI infrastructure.
NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) price
Full chart and statsLoading chart…
- Last close
- $215
- Close-to-close change
- −1.2%
- Market cap
- $5.2T (shares as of 2026-08-21)
- P/E (trailing)
- 27.2 (EPS to 2026-07-26)
- Annual revenue
- $215.9B USD (FY ended 2026-01-25) 10-K
- Annual revenue growth
- +65.5% (FY ended 2026-01-25 vs FY ended 2025-01-26) 10-K
- Annual net income
- 120,067,000,000 USD (FY ended 2026-01-25, attributable to the company) 10-K
- Annual operating margin
- 60.4% (FY ended 2026-01-25)
- Forward P/E
- Unavailable: no dated forecast source
Gloria daily close for session Oct 28, 2026. Market cap and trailing P/E use this close with the SEC share total and trailing diluted earnings, each dated next to its figure. Annual revenue, revenue growth, net income and margin show their own fiscal period and link the 10-K. Current context may postdate this article.
NVIDIA Corporation and its peers
| Company | Price | Market cap | P/E (trailing) | Forward P/E | Annual revenue (USD) | Annual revenue growth | Annual net income (USD) | Operating margin |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
$215 | $5.2T | 27.2 | Unavailable | $215.9BFY ended 2026-01-25 · 10-K | +65.5%FY ended 2026-01-25 vs 2025-01-26 · 10-K | 120,067,000,000FY ended 2026-01-25, attributable to the company · 10-K | 60.4%FY ended 2026-01-25 |
|
|
$352 | $1.7T | 44.9 | Unavailable | $63.9BFY ended 2025-11-02 · 10-K | +23.9%FY ended 2025-11-02 vs 2024-11-03 · 10-K | 23,126,000,000FY ended 2025-11-02, consolidated · 10-K | 39.9%FY ended 2025-11-02 |
|
|
$983 | $1.1T | 13.2 | Unavailable | $133.2BFY ended 2026-09-03 · 10-K | +256.3%FY ended 2026-09-03 vs 2025-08-28 · 10-K | 84,969,000,000FY ended 2026-09-03, attributable to the company · 10-K | 74.6%FY ended 2026-09-03 |
|
|
$578 | $944.3B | 148.3 | Unavailable | $34.6BFY ended 2025-12-27 · 10-K | +34.3%FY ended 2025-12-27 vs 2024-12-28 · 10-K | 4,335,000,000FY ended 2025-12-27, attributable to the company · 10-K | 10.7%FY ended 2025-12-27 |
Missing figures stay unavailable. Forward P/E requires a dated source. Annual revenue, revenue growth, net income and margin come from each company's own 10-K, in US dollars, and each row shows that fiscal year. Revenue growth compares the fiscal year with the prior year stated in the same 10-K. Net income is the full year amount attributable to the company, or available to common stockholders where the filing states only that, or consolidated net income. Each row names its basis. Trailing P/E reads "Not meaningful" when the dated trailing diluted EPS is a loss or zero. An operating margin appears only when the filing states both the operating income and the revenue for the same year.
Sources: SEC filings, Gloria daily closes and CoinGecko. Oldest record refresh: Oct 28, 2026, 5:46 PM EDT. Refresh is not a price or filing date. Each row shows its price date and its annual fiscal period. Peers use industry code and company size, or editorial selection. Market cap multiplies that row price by the company share total the latest SEC filing states for every share class together. Trailing P/E divides it by trailing diluted earnings from SEC filings. Rolled earnings per share are approximate because share counts can change between periods. Both appear only when the SEC data carries its date, so they are estimates at one price date, not synchronized filing valuations. Not investment advice.
Token vs underlying stock
Current comparison for NVDA. Historical observations may postdate this article.
NVDAx token unit vs NVDA share · USD
-2.2% over displayed period
● NVDAx token┄ NVDA stock: $215.38
Source: CoinGecko + Gloria · Retrieved Oct 28, 19:51 UTC
Methodology and data
Split-adjusted regular-session stock closes from the existing Gloria shared history, paired only with an observed token price within 45 minutes of 16:00 New York time. Up to 60 matched sessions. No interpolation or missing-date fill. Weekends and known early closes are omitted. Token units are not adjusted for issuer multipliers or dividend treatment. This compares quoted prices, not fair value, executable premiums or arbitrage returns. Solid line: token. Dashed line: stock. Exact quote times and values appear below. Historical observations. Retrieval refers to the token source. Token quote times use UTC. The fixed cohort shows its oldest member fetch.
| Date (UTC) | Token (USD) | Stock close (USD) | Token quote (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-08-05 | 219.87 | 219.22 | 2026-08-05 20:00 |
| 2026-08-06 | 219.15 | 218.99 | 2026-08-06 20:00 |
| 2026-08-07 | 223.93 | 223.96 | 2026-08-07 20:00 |
| 2026-08-10 | 217.66 | 217.55 | 2026-08-10 20:00 |
| 2026-08-11 | 217.53 | 217.50 | 2026-08-11 20:00 |
| 2026-08-12 | 224.12 | 224.09 | 2026-08-12 20:00 |
| 2026-08-13 | 225.42 | 225.30 | 2026-08-13 20:00 |
| 2026-08-14 | 225.34 | 225.16 | 2026-08-14 20:00 |
| 2026-08-17 | 225.13 | 225.01 | 2026-08-17 20:00 |
| 2026-08-18 | 219.70 | 219.74 | 2026-08-18 20:00 |
| 2026-08-19 | 217.76 | 217.56 | 2026-08-19 20:00 |
| 2026-08-20 | 216.79 | 216.85 | 2026-08-20 20:00 |
| 2026-08-21 | 214.85 | 214.72 | 2026-08-21 20:00 |
| 2026-08-24 | 208.75 | 208.48 | 2026-08-24 20:00 |
| 2026-08-25 | 213.16 | 213.05 | 2026-08-25 20:00 |
| 2026-08-26 | 210.06 | 209.66 | 2026-08-26 20:00 |
| 2026-08-27 | 227.96 | 227.98 | 2026-08-27 20:00 |
| 2026-08-28 | 217.74 | 217.55 | 2026-08-28 20:00 |
| 2026-08-31 | 220.91 | 220.78 | 2026-08-31 20:00 |
| 2026-09-01 | 217.58 | 217.44 | 2026-09-01 20:00 |
| 2026-09-02 | 224.46 | 224.41 | 2026-09-02 20:00 |
| 2026-09-03 | 228.90 | 228.45 | 2026-09-03 20:00 |
| 2026-09-04 | 230.35 | 230.36 | 2026-09-04 20:00 |
| 2026-09-08 | 225.69 | 225.73 | 2026-09-08 20:00 |
| 2026-09-09 | 223.89 | 223.67 | 2026-09-09 20:00 |
| 2026-09-10 | 218.70 | 218.36 | 2026-09-10 20:00 |
| 2026-09-11 | 218.92 | 218.29 | 2026-09-11 20:00 |
| 2026-09-14 | 211.47 | 210.96 | 2026-09-14 20:00 |
| 2026-09-15 | 212.34 | 212.17 | 2026-09-15 20:00 |
| 2026-09-16 | 214.25 | 213.90 | 2026-09-16 20:00 |
| 2026-09-17 | 219.68 | 219.34 | 2026-09-17 20:00 |
| 2026-09-18 | 222.24 | 222.27 | 2026-09-18 20:00 |
| 2026-09-21 | 227.69 | 227.38 | 2026-09-21 20:00 |
| 2026-09-22 | 229.20 | 228.87 | 2026-09-22 20:00 |
| 2026-09-23 | 225.44 | 225.51 | 2026-09-23 20:00 |
| 2026-09-24 | 224.87 | 224.58 | 2026-09-24 20:00 |
| 2026-09-25 | 225.29 | 225.07 | 2026-09-25 20:00 |
| 2026-09-28 | 228.97 | 228.86 | 2026-09-28 20:00 |
| 2026-09-29 | 227.95 | 227.21 | 2026-09-29 20:00 |
| 2026-09-30 | 229.85 | 228.38 | 2026-09-30 20:00 |
| 2026-10-01 | 231.18 | 230.86 | 2026-10-01 20:00 |
| 2026-10-02 | 234.38 | 233.95 | 2026-10-02 20:00 |
| 2026-10-05 | 239.30 | 238.90 | 2026-10-05 20:00 |
| 2026-10-06 | 239.71 | 239.24 | 2026-10-06 20:00 |
| 2026-10-07 | 237.80 | 237.47 | 2026-10-07 20:00 |
| 2026-10-08 | 230.81 | 230.48 | 2026-10-08 20:00 |
| 2026-10-09 | 229.70 | 229.28 | 2026-10-09 20:00 |
| 2026-10-12 | 226.87 | 226.32 | 2026-10-12 20:00 |
| 2026-10-13 | 228.73 | 228.52 | 2026-10-13 20:00 |
| 2026-10-14 | 221.56 | 221.30 | 2026-10-14 20:00 |
| 2026-10-15 | 217.48 | 217.23 | 2026-10-15 20:00 |
| 2026-10-16 | 214.56 | 214.13 | 2026-10-16 20:00 |
| 2026-10-19 | 217.41 | 217.09 | 2026-10-19 20:00 |
| 2026-10-20 | 216.69 | 216.47 | 2026-10-20 20:00 |
| 2026-10-21 | 222.20 | 221.97 | 2026-10-21 20:00 |
| 2026-10-22 | 212.42 | 212.21 | 2026-10-22 20:00 |
| 2026-10-23 | 211.27 | 210.96 | 2026-10-23 20:00 |
| 2026-10-26 | 216.15 | 216.00 | 2026-10-26 20:00 |
| 2026-10-27 | 218.06 | 217.94 | 2026-10-27 20:00 |
| 2026-10-28 | 215.14 | 215.38 | 2026-10-28 19:49 |
Stock history: Gloria · Retrieved Oct 29, 00:31 UTC. Token history: CoinGecko NVDAx.
Quoted token and share units can have different rights, multipliers and dividend treatment. This is not an executable premium or arbitrage signal.
If you thought AI infrastructure was already expensive, Nvidia just raised the bar. The company’s upcoming Vera Rubin NVL72 rack, its next-generation AI supercomputing system, carries an estimated bill-of-materials cost of $7.8 million, according to Morgan Stanley analyst estimates.
That’s roughly double the $3.5 million to $4 million price tag attached to the current Blackwell NVL72 racks. And the single biggest reason for the jump isn’t the GPUs themselves. It’s the memory.
Memory costs are doing the heavy lifting
High-bandwidth memory, specifically HBM4 and LPDDR5X, has seen a 435% price increase in the new rack design. In dollar terms, memory components now account for approximately $2 million per rack, representing about 25-26% of the total system cost.
GPU costs haven’t stayed flat either, climbing 57% compared to the Blackwell generation. Other components piled on: printed circuit boards saw increases of up to 233%. Memory demand is driven by robust demand and persistent supply constraints in the semiconductor ecosystem.
Each Vera Rubin rack packs 72 Rubin GPUs paired with 36 Vera CPUs, a configuration that demands significantly more memory content than its predecessor.
AI, tech, and the markets they move—in one daily briefing.
Daily. Free. Join 34,000+ readers across crypto, finance, and policy.
What you get for $7.8 million
The Vera Rubin platform represents a fundamental shift toward what the company calls full-stack AI systems, integrating its next-generation Rubin GPUs with proprietary Vera CPUs in a single rack-scale design optimized for agentic AI workloads.
The performance claims are significant. Nvidia says the system can handle Mixture-of-Experts training, a popular architecture behind frontier AI models, with four times fewer GPUs than the Blackwell series. Inference costs, meanwhile, are reportedly ten times lower per million tokens compared to Blackwell.
Initial shipments of Vera CPU racks have already gone out to Anthropic, OpenAI, SpaceX, and Oracle. Volume production is targeted for Q4 2026, following initial deliveries planned for Q3 of the same year.
The bigger picture for AI infrastructure spending
Memory suppliers are in an enviable position. HBM4 is a cutting-edge technology with limited manufacturing capacity, and every major AI chip designer wants as much of it as they can get. That supply-demand imbalance is showing up directly in rack-level pricing. When memory goes from a supporting role to 25% of a rack’s total cost, that’s a structural shift in where profits accumulate.
Disclosure: This article was edited by Editorial Team. For more information on how we create and review content, see our Editorial Policy.
More in AI
See all-
Moonshot AI and DeepSeek reportedly used OpenAI’s GPT-6 Astra outputs to build new models
-
House Democrats push resolution to let failing AI firms go bankrupt, not bailed out
-
TikTok researchers warn that MCP tools can quietly turn AI agents against their users
-
Trump flags imported robotics as a national security risk, holds off on tariffs
-
Alphabet and Microsoft post strong cloud growth as AI partnerships turn complicated
-
Google’s engineering benchmark finds top AI agents scoring just 50.6%

