Broadcom just pulled off one of the largest private credit transactions ever linked to AI infrastructure. S&P Global Ratings took one look at the first tranche and said: not great for your credit profile.

On June 11, S&P Global Ratings characterized the first tranche of Broadcom’s AI XPV Platform financing as credit negative. The designation applies to a sprawling $35 billion deal led by Apollo with participation from Blackstone, announced just two days earlier on June 9. The purpose: funding Anthropic’s massive expansion in AI computing capacity.

Inside the $35 billion structure

The financing is structured through what Broadcom calls its AI XPV Platform, a debt vehicle designed to fund the company’s push into custom AI silicon without crushing its balance sheet.

The debt breaks down into two distinct risk tiers. Senior A1 and A2 notes account for roughly $30 billion of the total. These carry a safety net in the form of Broadcom’s residual value support, meaning the company stands behind them with its own balance sheet guarantees.

Then there’s the $4.5 billion B tranche. That one lacks the same backing.

S&P’s credit negative tag landed specifically on the first AI tranche. It’s not a downgrade. It’s not even a warning of an imminent downgrade. It signals that this particular financial maneuver introduces incremental risk to Broadcom’s overall credit profile.

Broadcom is currently sitting on a strong A- rating from S&P, an upgrade the agency handed out in September 2025 based largely on the company’s surging AI revenue. That rating hasn’t changed.

Why Broadcom is betting this big

Broadcom’s fiscal 2026 revenue projections are approaching $84 billion. The AI XPV Platform is specifically designed to support multi-gigawatt deployments. Broadcom has already locked in partnerships with OpenAI and Meta for custom AI silicon production. Adding Anthropic to the mix through this financing arrangement deepens its position as a central player in the AI supply chain.

What this means for investors

S&P flagging the tranche as credit negative while keeping Broadcom’s A- rating intact signals the agency sees risk in the structure but not enough to question Broadcom’s fundamental creditworthiness.

For bondholders and credit investors specifically, the gap between the A1/A2 tranches and the B tranche deserves scrutiny. The $30 billion in senior notes backed by Broadcom’s residual value support represent a fundamentally different risk proposition than the $4.5 billion sitting in the B tranche without that cushion.