Skip to content
Advertisement
JPMorgan’s Bob Michele surprised by FOMC’s hawkish shift under Warsh

JPMorgan’s Bob Michele surprised by FOMC’s hawkish shift under Warsh

The Fed's new chair is already making his inflation-fighting intentions clear, and fixed income markets are taking notice

JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) price

Full chart and stats

Loading chart…

Market cap
$892.6B (shares as of 2026-06-30)
P/E (trailing)
14.4 (EPS to 2026-06-30)
Annual revenue
$182.4B USD (FY ended 2025-12-31) 10-K
Annual revenue growth
+2.8% (FY ended 2025-12-31 vs FY ended 2024-12-31) 10-K
Annual net income
57,048,000,000 USD (FY ended 2025-12-31, attributable to the company) 10-K
Annual operating margin
Unavailable
Forward P/E
Unavailable: no dated forecast source

Gloria daily close for session Oct 27, 2026. Market cap and trailing P/E use this close with the SEC share total and trailing diluted earnings, each dated next to its figure. Annual revenue, revenue growth, net income and margin show their own fiscal period and link the 10-K. Current context may postdate this article.

JPMorgan Chase & Co. and its peers

Company PriceMarket capP/E (trailing)Forward P/EAnnual revenue (USD)Annual revenue growthAnnual net income (USD)Operating margin
JPMorgan Chase & Co. JPM · Price dated Oct 27, 2026 · tokenized JPMx $336$892.6B14.4Unavailable$182.4BFY ended 2025-12-31 · 10-K+2.8%FY ended 2025-12-31 vs 2024-12-31 · 10-K57,048,000,000FY ended 2025-12-31, attributable to the company · 10-KUnavailable
Bank of America Corporation BAC · Price dated Oct 27, 2026 · tokenized BACx $51$354.4B11.7Unavailable$113.1BFY ended 2025-12-31 · 10-K+6.8%FY ended 2025-12-31 vs 2024-12-31 · 10-K30,509,000,000FY ended 2025-12-31, attributable to the company · 10-KUnavailable
Wells Fargo & Company WFC · Price dated Oct 27, 2026 $83$248.1B11.7Unavailable$83.7BFY ended 2025-12-31 · 10-K+1.7%FY ended 2025-12-31 vs 2024-12-31 · 10-K21,338,000,000FY ended 2025-12-31, attributable to the company · 10-KUnavailable
Citigroup Inc. C · Price dated Oct 27, 2026 $123$205.8B13.2Unavailable$85.2BFY ended 2025-12-31 · 10-K+5.6%FY ended 2025-12-31 vs 2024-12-31 · 10-K14,306,000,000FY ended 2025-12-31, attributable to the company · 10-KUnavailable

Missing figures stay unavailable. Forward P/E requires a dated source. Annual revenue, revenue growth, net income and margin come from each company's own 10-K, in US dollars, and each row shows that fiscal year. Revenue growth compares the fiscal year with the prior year stated in the same 10-K. Net income is the full year amount attributable to the company, or available to common stockholders where the filing states only that, or consolidated net income. Each row names its basis. Trailing P/E reads "Not meaningful" when the dated trailing diluted EPS is a loss or zero. An operating margin appears only when the filing states both the operating income and the revenue for the same year.

Sources: SEC filings, Gloria daily closes and CoinGecko. Oldest record refresh: Oct 27, 2026, 10:46 PM EDT. Refresh is not a price or filing date. Each row shows its price date and its annual fiscal period. Peers use industry code and company size, or editorial selection. Market cap multiplies that row price by the company share total the latest SEC filing states for every share class together. Trailing P/E divides it by trailing diluted earnings from SEC filings. Rolled earnings per share are approximate because share counts can change between periods. Both appear only when the SEC data carries its date, so they are estimates at one price date, not synchronized filing valuations. Not investment advice.

The Federal Reserve under new Chair Kevin Warsh just held its first meeting, and the message was unmistakable: inflation control comes first. The FOMC kept the federal funds rate pinned at 3.50%-3.75% during its June 16-17 gathering, a decision that caught even seasoned bond market veterans off guard with its hawkish tone.

Bob Michele, JPMorgan Asset Management’s Global Head of Fixed Income, described the committee as carrying a “hawkish tilt” driven by persistent inflation pressures.

A new sheriff with an old playbook

Warsh’s appointment to succeed Jerome Powell came with a well-known backstory. He previously served at the Fed from 2006 to 2011, a period that included navigating the global financial crisis. His reputation from that era was clear: inflation discipline first, accommodative policy second.

Advertisement

Michele had actually been reading the tea leaves before Warsh’s first meeting. He pointed to unusual dissents among FOMC policymakers at the April 2026 meeting as an early warning sign. In his view, those dissents were critical signals about where the committee was heading under new leadership, essentially telegraphing that the inflation hawks were gaining altitude.

Energy price volatility and broader geopolitical tensions have only reinforced the committee’s caution.

What Michele is actually saying

Michele isn’t saying the hawkish stance is irrational. He’s saying the degree of the shift was sharper than expected.

The prior Fed regime had been gradually leaning toward easing. Rate cuts were a matter of timing, not direction, in the consensus view. Warsh’s arrival has fundamentally reframed that conversation. Instead of asking “when do we cut,” the FOMC appears to be asking “how long do we hold.”

Michele’s observation about the committee’s inflation focus also carries an implicit message about the Fed’s communication strategy under Warsh. Powell was known for a measured, sometimes deliberately ambiguous approach to forward guidance. Early signals suggest Warsh may be more direct, letting the hawkish positioning speak for itself rather than softening it with dovish qualifiers.

What this means for investors

Fixed income is the most obvious pressure point. When the Fed signals that rates are staying elevated, bond prices face headwinds. Yield curves adjust. Duration risk becomes a bigger factor in portfolio construction.

What traders should watch going forward is the Fed’s evolving language around inflation metrics. Warsh’s committee may adopt different benchmarks or communication frameworks than Powell’s, and those shifts in emphasis can move markets before actual policy changes do. The dissent patterns that Michele flagged from April suggest internal debates are ongoing, meaning the committee’s consensus could shift again depending on incoming data.

Disclosure: This article was edited by Editorial Team. For more information on how we create and review content, see our Editorial Policy.

More in Macro

See all
Previous storyUrsula von der Leyen highlights US-EU cooperation on AI models at G7 summit