Google, Nvidia outperform S&P 500 as 5 Magnificent Seven stocks lag
Only two of the mega-cap tech giants have beaten the benchmark in 2025, signaling a fracture in the trade that defined the last bull run
Alphabet Inc. (GOOGL) price
Full chart and statsLoading chart…
- Last close
- $284
- Close-to-close change
- −13%
- Market cap
- $3.5T (shares as of 2026-09-30)
- P/E (trailing)
- 14.8 (EPS to 2026-09-30)
- Annual revenue
- $402.8B USD (FY ended 2025-12-31) 10-K
- Annual revenue growth
- +15.1% (FY ended 2025-12-31 vs FY ended 2024-12-31) 10-K
- Annual net income
- 132,170,000,000 USD (FY ended 2025-12-31, attributable to the company) 10-K
- Annual operating margin
- 32.0% (FY ended 2025-12-31)
- Forward P/E
- Unavailable: no dated forecast source
Gloria daily close for session Oct 29, 2026. Market cap and trailing P/E use this close with the SEC share total and trailing diluted earnings, each dated next to its figure. Annual revenue, revenue growth, net income and margin show their own fiscal period and link the 10-K. Current context may postdate this article.
Alphabet Inc. and its peers
| Company | Price | Market cap | P/E (trailing) | Forward P/E | Annual revenue (USD) | Annual revenue growth | Annual net income (USD) | Operating margin |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
$284 | $3.5T | 14.8 | Unavailable | $402.8BFY ended 2025-12-31 · 10-K | +15.1%FY ended 2025-12-31 vs 2024-12-31 · 10-K | 132,170,000,000FY ended 2025-12-31, attributable to the company · 10-K | 32.0%FY ended 2025-12-31 |
|
|
$282 | $3.5T | 14.7 | Unavailable | $402.8BFY ended 2025-12-31 · 10-K | +15.1%FY ended 2025-12-31 vs 2024-12-31 · 10-K | 132,170,000,000FY ended 2025-12-31, attributable to the company · 10-K | 32.0%FY ended 2025-12-31 |
|
|
$625 | $1.6T | 21.3 | Unavailable | $201.0BFY ended 2025-12-31 · 10-K | +22.2%FY ended 2025-12-31 vs 2024-12-31 · 10-K | 60,458,000,000FY ended 2025-12-31, attributable to the company · 10-K | 41.4%FY ended 2025-12-31 |
|
|
$255 | $85.5B | 19.6 | Unavailable | $5.5BFY ended 2025-12-31 · 10-K | +70.0%FY ended 2025-12-31 vs 2024-12-31 · 10-K | 3,333,751,000FY ended 2025-12-31, attributable to the company · 10-K | 75.8%FY ended 2025-12-31 |
Missing figures stay unavailable. Forward P/E requires a dated source. Annual revenue, revenue growth, net income and margin come from each company's own 10-K, in US dollars, and each row shows that fiscal year. Revenue growth compares the fiscal year with the prior year stated in the same 10-K. Net income is the full year amount attributable to the company, or available to common stockholders where the filing states only that, or consolidated net income. Each row names its basis. Trailing P/E reads "Not meaningful" when the dated trailing diluted EPS is a loss or zero. An operating margin appears only when the filing states both the operating income and the revenue for the same year.
Sources: SEC filings, Gloria daily closes and CoinGecko. Oldest record refresh: Oct 29, 2026, 12:56 PM EDT. Refresh is not a price or filing date. Each row shows its price date and its annual fiscal period. Peers use industry code and company size, or editorial selection. Market cap multiplies that row price by the company share total the latest SEC filing states for every share class together. Trailing P/E divides it by trailing diluted earnings from SEC filings. Rolled earnings per share are approximate because share counts can change between periods. Both appear only when the SEC data carries its date, so they are estimates at one price date, not synchronized filing valuations. Not investment advice.
Token vs underlying stock
Current comparison for GOOGL. Historical observations may postdate this article.
GOOGLx token unit vs GOOGL share · USD
-20.6% over displayed period
● GOOGLx token┄ GOOGL stock: $283.82
Source: CoinGecko + Gloria · Retrieved Oct 30, 06:15 UTC
Methodology and data
Split-adjusted regular-session stock closes from the existing Gloria shared history, paired only with an observed token price within 45 minutes of 16:00 New York time. Up to 60 matched sessions. No interpolation or missing-date fill. Weekends and known early closes are omitted. Token units are not adjusted for issuer multipliers or dividend treatment. This compares quoted prices, not fair value, executable premiums or arbitrage returns. Solid line: token. Dashed line: stock. Exact quote times and values appear below. Historical observations. Retrieval refers to the token source. Token quote times use UTC. The fixed cohort shows its oldest member fetch.
| Date (UTC) | Token (USD) | Stock close (USD) | Token quote (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-08-06 | 358.14 | 357.75 | 2026-08-06 20:00 |
| 2026-08-07 | 355.20 | 354.30 | 2026-08-07 20:00 |
| 2026-08-10 | 357.76 | 357.52 | 2026-08-10 20:00 |
| 2026-08-11 | 344.26 | 343.80 | 2026-08-11 20:00 |
| 2026-08-12 | 344.44 | 343.54 | 2026-08-12 20:00 |
| 2026-08-13 | 347.06 | 346.36 | 2026-08-13 20:00 |
| 2026-08-14 | 346.47 | 345.90 | 2026-08-14 20:00 |
| 2026-08-17 | 344.71 | 344.00 | 2026-08-17 20:00 |
| 2026-08-18 | 344.71 | 344.20 | 2026-08-18 20:00 |
| 2026-08-19 | 345.42 | 344.72 | 2026-08-19 20:00 |
| 2026-08-20 | 341.21 | 340.67 | 2026-08-20 20:00 |
| 2026-08-21 | 345.60 | 344.82 | 2026-08-21 20:00 |
| 2026-08-24 | 348.94 | 348.06 | 2026-08-24 20:00 |
| 2026-08-25 | 347.59 | 346.96 | 2026-08-25 20:00 |
| 2026-08-26 | 342.69 | 342.00 | 2026-08-26 20:00 |
| 2026-08-27 | 341.18 | 340.65 | 2026-08-27 20:00 |
| 2026-08-28 | 347.10 | 346.59 | 2026-08-28 20:00 |
| 2026-08-31 | 339.89 | 339.35 | 2026-08-31 20:00 |
| 2026-09-01 | 335.42 | 335.02 | 2026-09-01 20:00 |
| 2026-09-02 | 337.78 | 337.12 | 2026-09-02 20:00 |
| 2026-09-03 | 342.96 | 342.48 | 2026-09-03 20:00 |
| 2026-09-04 | 339.38 | 338.46 | 2026-09-04 20:00 |
| 2026-09-08 | 338.99 | 338.36 | 2026-09-08 20:00 |
| 2026-09-09 | 331.31 | 330.65 | 2026-09-09 20:00 |
| 2026-09-10 | 333.00 | 332.60 | 2026-09-10 20:00 |
| 2026-09-11 | 339.44 | 338.50 | 2026-09-11 20:00 |
| 2026-09-14 | 350.02 | 349.39 | 2026-09-14 20:00 |
| 2026-09-15 | 345.54 | 344.98 | 2026-09-15 20:00 |
| 2026-09-16 | 343.72 | 342.87 | 2026-09-16 20:00 |
| 2026-09-17 | 348.19 | 347.33 | 2026-09-17 20:00 |
| 2026-09-18 | 349.96 | 349.54 | 2026-09-18 20:00 |
| 2026-09-21 | 355.68 | 354.97 | 2026-09-21 20:00 |
| 2026-09-22 | 351.84 | 351.16 | 2026-09-22 20:00 |
| 2026-09-23 | 338.83 | 337.83 | 2026-09-23 20:00 |
| 2026-09-24 | 343.15 | 342.36 | 2026-09-24 20:00 |
| 2026-09-25 | 344.56 | 343.92 | 2026-09-25 20:00 |
| 2026-09-28 | 343.44 | 342.75 | 2026-09-28 20:00 |
| 2026-09-29 | 341.65 | 340.92 | 2026-09-29 20:00 |
| 2026-09-30 | 344.99 | 344.08 | 2026-09-30 20:00 |
| 2026-10-01 | 339.14 | 338.24 | 2026-10-01 20:00 |
| 2026-10-02 | 344.17 | 343.50 | 2026-10-02 20:00 |
| 2026-10-05 | 347.05 | 346.47 | 2026-10-05 20:00 |
| 2026-10-06 | 348.53 | 347.68 | 2026-10-06 20:00 |
| 2026-10-07 | 351.27 | 350.50 | 2026-10-07 20:00 |
| 2026-10-08 | 348.51 | 348.29 | 2026-10-08 20:00 |
| 2026-10-09 | 352.71 | 351.66 | 2026-10-09 20:00 |
| 2026-10-12 | 353.57 | 352.72 | 2026-10-12 20:00 |
| 2026-10-13 | 354.45 | 353.78 | 2026-10-13 20:00 |
| 2026-10-14 | 347.97 | 347.64 | 2026-10-14 20:00 |
| 2026-10-15 | 350.19 | 349.22 | 2026-10-15 20:00 |
| 2026-10-16 | 341.50 | 340.59 | 2026-10-16 20:00 |
| 2026-10-19 | 345.25 | 344.18 | 2026-10-19 20:00 |
| 2026-10-20 | 340.61 | 340.28 | 2026-10-20 20:00 |
| 2026-10-21 | 335.85 | 334.76 | 2026-10-21 20:00 |
| 2026-10-22 | 324.33 | 324.22 | 2026-10-22 20:00 |
| 2026-10-23 | 321.30 | 320.21 | 2026-10-23 20:00 |
| 2026-10-26 | 317.69 | 316.80 | 2026-10-26 20:00 |
| 2026-10-27 | 321.43 | 320.58 | 2026-10-27 20:00 |
| 2026-10-28 | 325.97 | 324.89 | 2026-10-28 20:00 |
| 2026-10-29 | 284.45 | 283.82 | 2026-10-29 20:00 |
Stock history: Gloria · Retrieved Oct 30, 00:32 UTC. Token history: CoinGecko GOOGLx.
Quoted token and share units can have different rights, multipliers and dividend treatment. This is not an executable premium or arbitrage signal.
The Magnificent Seven trade, once the simplest bet on Wall Street, has splintered. Five of the seven mega-cap tech stocks that dominated markets for years have underperformed the S&P 500 since the start of 2025, leaving only Nvidia and Alphabet, Google’s parent company, carrying the torch for Big Tech outperformance.
The S&P 500 returned 16.4% for 2025. Alphabet crushed that with a roughly 65.4% gain, while Nvidia posted approximately 38.9%. The other five members of the club, Apple, Microsoft, Amazon, Meta Platforms, and Tesla, all failed to keep pace with the broader index.
The great divergence
The term “Magnificent Seven” was coined by Bank of America analyst Michael Hartnett to describe the group: Apple, Microsoft, Nvidia, Amazon, Meta Platforms, Alphabet, and Tesla. These seven stocks collectively represent approximately one-third of the S&P 500’s total market capitalization.
When a third of the index’s weight is spread across just seven names, the performance of those names disproportionately shapes the experience of anyone holding a passive S&P 500 fund. And when five of those seven are dragging, the math gets uncomfortable.
The equal-weighted S&P 500, which gives the same importance to every stock in the index regardless of size, has actually demonstrated better relative performance during this period. It means the average stock in the index is doing fine. The underperformance is concentrated in the very names that were supposed to be bulletproof.
Why the split matters
Nvidia’s outperformance makes intuitive sense. The company sells the picks and shovels of the AI gold rush, the GPUs that every major tech company and startup needs to train and run large language models.
AI, tech, and the markets they move—in one daily briefing.
Daily. Free. Join 34,000+ readers across crypto, finance, and policy.
Alphabet’s story is slightly different but equally compelling. Google has managed to integrate AI into its core search and cloud businesses in ways that investors find credible. A 65.4% annual return suggests the market believes Alphabet isn’t just spending on AI but actually monetizing it.
Investor sentiment around AI-related spending appears to have shifted. The market was happy to reward massive capital expenditures on data centers and AI infrastructure when the story was fresh. But as the bills pile up and concrete revenue attributions remain fuzzy for some of these companies, patience has worn thin.
What this means for investors
An investor who went all-in on Alphabet saw a 65.4% return. Someone who spread their bets equally across all seven saw their gains diluted by five laggards.
Analysts have begun questioning whether the Mag 7’s future earnings growth can sustain their outsized weighting in the index compared to the other 493 stocks.
One potential strategy gaining traction: tilting toward the equal-weighted S&P 500 or exploring mid-cap and smaller stocks that have quietly outperformed the Mag 7 laggards. The broader market’s solid 16.4% return proves there’s plenty of opportunity outside the usual suspects.
Disclosure: This article was edited by Editorial Team. For more information on how we create and review content, see our Editorial Policy.
More in Technology
See all-
New Axios-CivicScience index finds Americans expect an AI boom without the jobs
-
Anthropic’s IPO filing warns of existential AI risk, but the software threat may arrive first
-
Wikimedia Foundation warns AI copyright ruling could threaten open web
-
Foxconn chairman eyes 50% of the global AI server market
-
Cisco hands a 27-year-old engineer the keys to a sweeping code rewrite
-
Jensen Huang says the US is not in the top 3 for manufacturing and tech

