+15.1% (FY ended 2025-12-31 vs FY ended 2024-12-31) 10-K
Annual net income
132,170,000,000 USD (FY ended 2025-12-31, attributable to the company) 10-K
Annual operating margin
32.0% (FY ended 2025-12-31)
Forward P/E
Unavailable: no dated forecast source
Gloria daily close for session Oct 27, 2026. Market cap and trailing P/E use this close with the SEC share total and trailing diluted earnings, each dated next to its figure. Annual revenue, revenue growth, net income and margin show their own fiscal period and link the 10-K. Current context may postdate this article.
Alphabet Inc. and its peers
Company
Price
Market cap
P/E (trailing)
Forward P/E
Annual revenue (USD)
Annual revenue growth
Annual net income (USD)
Operating margin
Alphabet Inc.
GOOGL · Price dated Oct 27, 2026 · tokenized GOOGLx
3,333,751,000FY ended 2025-12-31, attributable to the company · 10-K
75.8%FY ended 2025-12-31
Missing figures stay unavailable. Forward P/E requires a dated source. Annual revenue, revenue growth, net income and margin come from each company's own 10-K, in US dollars, and each row shows that fiscal year. Revenue growth compares the fiscal year with the prior year stated in the same 10-K. Net income is the full year amount attributable to the company, or available to common stockholders where the filing states only that, or consolidated net income. Each row names its basis. Trailing P/E reads "Not meaningful" when the dated trailing diluted EPS is a loss or zero. An operating margin appears only when the filing states both the operating income and the revenue for the same year.
Sources: SEC filings, Gloria daily closes and CoinGecko. Oldest record refresh: Oct 27, 2026, 8:48 PM EDT. Refresh is not a price or filing date. Each row shows its price date and its annual fiscal period. Peers use industry code and company size, or editorial selection. Market cap multiplies that row price by the company share total the latest SEC filing states for every share class together. Trailing P/E divides it by trailing diluted earnings from SEC filings. Rolled earnings per share are approximate because share counts can change between periods. Both appear only when the SEC data carries its date, so they are estimates at one price date, not synchronized filing valuations. Not investment advice.
Token vs underlying stock
Current comparison for GOOGL. Historical observations may postdate this article.
Split-adjusted regular-session stock closes from the existing Gloria shared history, paired only with an observed token price within 45 minutes of 16:00 New York time. Up to 60 matched sessions. No interpolation or missing-date fill. Weekends and known early closes are omitted. Token units are not adjusted for issuer multipliers or dividend treatment. This compares quoted prices, not fair value, executable premiums or arbitrage returns. Solid line: token. Dashed line: stock. Exact quote times and values appear below. Historical observations. Retrieval refers to the token source. Token quote times use UTC. The fixed cohort shows its oldest member fetch.
Alphabet token vs Alphabet stock: exact source values
Quoted token and share units can have different rights, multipliers and dividend treatment. This is not an executable premium or arbitrage signal.
Netlist, an Irvine, California-based memory technology company, filed a formal complaint with the US International Trade Commission against Samsung, Google, and Super Micro. The filing, dated September 30, 2025, alleges infringement of six patents tied to DDR5 memory modules and high-bandwidth memory (HBM) products.
Netlist isn’t just asking for money this time. The company wants US Customs and Border Protection to physically block the import of Samsung’s infringing DRAM modules, Google’s Tensor Processing Units, and Super Micro’s servers.
A patent portfolio with teeth
In April 2023, a jury awarded Netlist $303.15 million against Samsung for patent infringement. A second jury verdict in November 2024 tacked on another $118 million against Samsung for separate infringements. And in 2024, Micron was ordered to pay Netlist $445 million for patent violations.
Advertisement
The six patents at the center of the new ITC complaint include US Patent Nos. 12,737,366, 10,025,731, 10,268,608, 10,217,523, 9,824,035, and 12,308,087. These patents cover technologies used in DDR5 and HBM products.
The ITC route is strategically different from a standard federal lawsuit. Rather than seeking damages through the courts, an ITC complaint asks for exclusion orders that can halt product imports at the border.
AI, tech, and the markets they move—in one daily briefing.
Daily. Free. Join 34,000+ readers across crypto, finance, and policy.
The roots of this dispute trace back to 2015, when Netlist entered into a joint development agreement with Samsung. Netlist claims Samsung breached that agreement, effectively using Netlist’s proprietary technology to develop its own competing memory products without proper licensing or compensation.
Google’s inclusion in the complaint adds another dimension. The company’s Tensor Processing Units are custom AI accelerators that power Google Cloud’s machine learning infrastructure.
What this means for investors
If the ITC grants exclusion orders against Samsung’s DRAM modules, it could tighten an already constrained supply chain for AI memory components. The ITC typically moves faster than federal courts, which means a preliminary ruling could arrive within months rather than years.
Disclosure: This article was edited by Editorial Team. For more information on how we create and review content, see our Editorial Policy.
AI, tech, and the markets they move—in one daily briefing.Daily. Free. Join 34,000+ readers across crypto, finance, and policy.
Free daily briefing
Crypto Briefing Pro
The news about what you hold
Follow your stocks and crypto. Read the news about them from hundreds of publishers in Pro.
