Bank of America flags tech bubble risk but tells clients not to sit out the rally
BofA strategists suggest limited-risk equity derivatives as a way to ride the Nasdaq 100's AI-driven climb without full exposure to a potential bust
Bank of America Corporation (BAC) price
Full chart and statsLoading chart…
- Last close
- $51
- Close-to-close change
- +0.3%
- Market cap
- $355.6B (shares as of 2026-07-30)
- P/E (trailing)
- 11.7 (EPS to 2026-06-30)
- Annual revenue
- $113.1B USD (FY ended 2025-12-31) 10-K
- Annual revenue growth
- +6.8% (FY ended 2025-12-31 vs FY ended 2024-12-31) 10-K
- Annual net income
- 30,509,000,000 USD (FY ended 2025-12-31, attributable to the company) 10-K
- Annual operating margin
- Unavailable
- Forward P/E
- Unavailable: no dated forecast source
Gloria daily close for session Oct 28, 2026. Market cap and trailing P/E use this close with the SEC share total and trailing diluted earnings, each dated next to its figure. Annual revenue, revenue growth, net income and margin show their own fiscal period and link the 10-K. Current context may postdate this article.
Bank of America Corporation and its peers
| Company | Price | Market cap | P/E (trailing) | Forward P/E | Annual revenue (USD) | Annual revenue growth | Annual net income (USD) | Operating margin |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
$51 | $355.6B | 11.7 | Unavailable | $113.1BFY ended 2025-12-31 · 10-K | +6.8%FY ended 2025-12-31 vs 2024-12-31 · 10-K | 30,509,000,000FY ended 2025-12-31, attributable to the company · 10-K | Unavailable |
|
|
$84 | $251.2B | 11.8 | Unavailable | $83.7BFY ended 2025-12-31 · 10-K | +1.7%FY ended 2025-12-31 vs 2024-12-31 · 10-K | 21,338,000,000FY ended 2025-12-31, attributable to the company · 10-K | Unavailable |
|
|
$124 | $208.2B | 13.4 | Unavailable | $85.2BFY ended 2025-12-31 · 10-K | +5.6%FY ended 2025-12-31 vs 2024-12-31 · 10-K | 14,306,000,000FY ended 2025-12-31, attributable to the company · 10-K | Unavailable |
|
|
$339 | $901.9B | 14.5 | Unavailable | $182.4BFY ended 2025-12-31 · 10-K | +2.8%FY ended 2025-12-31 vs 2024-12-31 · 10-K | 57,048,000,000FY ended 2025-12-31, attributable to the company · 10-K | Unavailable |
Missing figures stay unavailable. Forward P/E requires a dated source. Annual revenue, revenue growth, net income and margin come from each company's own 10-K, in US dollars, and each row shows that fiscal year. Revenue growth compares the fiscal year with the prior year stated in the same 10-K. Net income is the full year amount attributable to the company, or available to common stockholders where the filing states only that, or consolidated net income. Each row names its basis. Trailing P/E reads "Not meaningful" when the dated trailing diluted EPS is a loss or zero. An operating margin appears only when the filing states both the operating income and the revenue for the same year.
Sources: SEC filings, Gloria daily closes and CoinGecko. Oldest record refresh: Oct 29, 2026, 1:46 PM EDT. Refresh is not a price or filing date. Each row shows its price date and its annual fiscal period. Peers use industry code and company size, or editorial selection. Market cap multiplies that row price by the company share total the latest SEC filing states for every share class together. Trailing P/E divides it by trailing diluted earnings from SEC filings. Rolled earnings per share are approximate because share counts can change between periods. Both appear only when the SEC data carries its date, so they are estimates at one price date, not synchronized filing valuations. Not investment advice.
Bank of America has a message for investors nervous about the tech megacaps pushing the Nasdaq 100 to record highs: you can still join the party, as long as you book a ride home in advance.
The bank’s strategists argue that equity derivatives offer a way to capture the rally while sidestepping the damage if it turns out to be a bubble.
The bubble warning, by the numbers
BofA analysts, with work on the theme led by Michael Hartnett, have been drawing comparisons between today’s AI-fueled market and the 2000 dot-com bubble.
The bank’s Bubble Risk Indicator, or BRI, for the Nasdaq 100 and the broader tech sector has climbed to a range of 0.72 to 0.8. Higher readings mean the conditions that tend to precede corrections are building.
The analysts say the current setup resembles the market roughly six months before the March 2000 dot-com peak.
There is an important difference, though. Only 18 stocks in the S&P 500 scored above the 0.8 BRI threshold, and together they represent just 3.2% of the index weight. At the height of the dot-com boom, somewhere between 50 and 100 stocks cleared that bar.
Why volatility is flashing late-1990s signals
VIXEQ, a gauge tied to single-stock volatility, is up 46% year to date. The VIX, Wall Street’s better-known fear index for the S&P 500, has risen 13% over the same stretch.
BofA notes that this kind of divergence is reminiscent of the late 1990s, when single names lurched around even as headline indexes kept marching higher.
AI, tech, and the markets they move—in one daily briefing.
Daily. Free. Join 34,000+ readers across crypto, finance, and policy.
The analysts also flagged the effect of high interest rates. Tech and AI-linked assets have kept rising while other sectors lagged significantly.
The money behind the AI trade
AI-related capital expenditures by US hyperscalers are forecast at approximately $795 billion for 2026. The projection for 2027 is about $1.08 trillion.
BofA’s playbook: call spreads, not concentrated bets
Rather than buying the megacaps outright, BofA’s strategists suggest limited-risk derivatives, particularly call spreads.
A call spread works like a capped bet. An investor buys a call option, which pays off if a stock or index rises above a set price. At the same time, they sell another call at a higher price, which helps pay for the first one but caps the potential gain.
The result is a position with a known, limited cost. If the rally continues, the investor profits up to a ceiling. If the bubble pops, the most they lose is what they paid for the trade, not a large chunk of a stock portfolio.
According to the research, these trades could be structured on Nasdaq 100 exposure or on semiconductor sector ETFs, the corner of the market most directly tied to the AI spending boom.
What this means for investors
Capped upside means investors give up some gains if the AI rally turns into a full melt-up. Options also carry their own complexities, including timing risk: a position can expire worthless if the market stalls, even if the long-term thesis proves right.
With just 18 stocks above the 0.8 BRI threshold and only 3.2% of S&P 500 weight in that zone, the risk is narrower than in 2000. If that number begins expanding toward the 50 to 100 range seen at the dot-com peak, it would suggest the euphoria is spreading beyond the AI leaders.
A 46% jump in VIXEQ against a 13% move in the VIX shows stress building at the company level.
The projected climb from roughly $795 billion in 2026 to about $1.08 trillion in 2027 is a vote of confidence from the companies doing the spending. Any sign that hyperscalers are pulling back would hit the exact stocks driving the Nasdaq 100.
Disclosure: This article was edited by Estefano Gomez. For more information on how we create and review content, see our Editorial Policy.
More in Technology
See all-
Google winds down Jules AI agent, folds its learnings into Antigravity
-
Nvidia in talks to back billions in debt for Nscale data center expansion
-
Reddit CEO Steve Huffman says the company isn’t counting on Google traffic coming back
-
Marvell Technology reportedly in talks to buy Lumentum in all-stock AI deal
-
Amazon CEO Andy Jassy says chip business is tripling every year
-
GLM-5.3 exploits Firefox vulnerabilities, prompting a Mozilla patch

