Bitcoin holds steady at $76K despite $1B in net selling

Bitcoin logo (public domain), by Grayliptrot via Wikimedia Commons (Public domain)

Bitcoin holds steady at $76K despite $1B in net selling

Whales and ETF investors dumped over $1.26 billion in two weeks, yet Bitcoin barely flinched, pointing to a market that's fundamentally changed.

Over the past ten days, roughly $1.26 billion in net Bitcoin selling hit the market. The price response? Essentially nothing. Bitcoin continues to trade around $76,000, absorbing a level of sell pressure that would have triggered a double-digit correction just a couple of years ago.

Where the selling came from

The $1.26 billion figure isn’t just a bunch of retail traders panic-selling into red candles. On-chain analytics firm CryptoQuant identified the sellers as predominantly whales and long-term holders who offloaded between $1 billion and $1.2 billion worth of Bitcoin within a two-week window.

A significant chunk of the action traces back to BlackRock’s iShares Bitcoin Trust, known by its ticker IBIT. The fund saw a dark-pool block sale of approximately $1.26 billion, covering roughly 29.2 million shares. Dark-pool transactions, for the uninitiated, are trades executed off public exchanges to avoid moving the market.

Advertisement

US spot Bitcoin ETFs piled on additional pressure, logging net outflows for somewhere between 9 and 12 consecutive trading days in late May. Those redemptions regularly reached into the hundreds of millions.

CryptoQuant’s data added an important nuance: the distribution came primarily from shorter-term whale wallets rather than widespread capitulation among the broader holder base.

What absorbed the blow

Corporate treasury buying stepped in as a major counterweight. MicroStrategy continued making significant acquisitions during this period.

CryptoQuant noted that whale distribution predominantly bypassed the open market, favoring broker and over-the-counter (OTC) transactions. OTC desks match large buyers with large sellers directly, keeping massive orders from hitting exchange order books and triggering cascading sell-offs.

Sporadic ETF inflows during other periods also helped absorb some of the pressure. While the headline number shows net selling, the flows weren’t uniformly negative. Some days saw capital coming back in, partially offsetting the redemption trend.

A market that’s growing up

For anyone trying to read Bitcoin’s price action, watching ETF flow data, monitoring corporate treasury announcements, and tracking on-chain whale movements through firms like CryptoQuant provides a more complete picture than staring at a four-hour chart.

The consecutive days of ETF outflows deserve continued attention. While the price held this time, sustained redemptions from spot Bitcoin ETFs could eventually overwhelm the buy-side demand that’s keeping things stable. If the corporate treasury bid slows down, there’s less to absorb it.

Disclosure: This article was edited by Editorial Team. For more information on how we create and review content, see our Editorial Policy.
Bitcoin holds steady at $76K despite $1B in net selling
Bitcoin holds steady at $76K despite $1B in net selling

Whales and ETF investors dumped over $1.26 billion in two weeks, yet Bitcoin barely flinched, pointing to a market that's fundamentally changed.

Bitcoin logo (public domain), by Grayliptrot via Wikimedia Commons (Public domain)

Over the past ten days, roughly $1.26 billion in net Bitcoin selling hit the market. The price response? Essentially nothing. Bitcoin continues to trade around $76,000, absorbing a level of sell pressure that would have triggered a double-digit correction just a couple of years ago.

Where the selling came from

The $1.26 billion figure isn’t just a bunch of retail traders panic-selling into red candles. On-chain analytics firm CryptoQuant identified the sellers as predominantly whales and long-term holders who offloaded between $1 billion and $1.2 billion worth of Bitcoin within a two-week window.

A significant chunk of the action traces back to BlackRock’s iShares Bitcoin Trust, known by its ticker IBIT. The fund saw a dark-pool block sale of approximately $1.26 billion, covering roughly 29.2 million shares. Dark-pool transactions, for the uninitiated, are trades executed off public exchanges to avoid moving the market.

Advertisement

US spot Bitcoin ETFs piled on additional pressure, logging net outflows for somewhere between 9 and 12 consecutive trading days in late May. Those redemptions regularly reached into the hundreds of millions.

CryptoQuant’s data added an important nuance: the distribution came primarily from shorter-term whale wallets rather than widespread capitulation among the broader holder base.

What absorbed the blow

Corporate treasury buying stepped in as a major counterweight. MicroStrategy continued making significant acquisitions during this period.

CryptoQuant noted that whale distribution predominantly bypassed the open market, favoring broker and over-the-counter (OTC) transactions. OTC desks match large buyers with large sellers directly, keeping massive orders from hitting exchange order books and triggering cascading sell-offs.

Sporadic ETF inflows during other periods also helped absorb some of the pressure. While the headline number shows net selling, the flows weren’t uniformly negative. Some days saw capital coming back in, partially offsetting the redemption trend.

A market that’s growing up

For anyone trying to read Bitcoin’s price action, watching ETF flow data, monitoring corporate treasury announcements, and tracking on-chain whale movements through firms like CryptoQuant provides a more complete picture than staring at a four-hour chart.

The consecutive days of ETF outflows deserve continued attention. While the price held this time, sustained redemptions from spot Bitcoin ETFs could eventually overwhelm the buy-side demand that’s keeping things stable. If the corporate treasury bid slows down, there’s less to absorb it.

Disclosure: This article was edited by Editorial Team. For more information on how we create and review content, see our Editorial Policy.