CXMT refuses Apple’s request for lower LPDDR5X pricing, demanding Samsung-level rates
Via tomshardware.com
China's rising memory chipmaker is playing hardball with the world's most valuable company, and the ripple effects could reshape tech supply chains and investor portfolios alike.
Apple Inc. (AAPL) price
Full chart and statsLoading chart…
- Last close
- $349
- Close-to-close change
- +1.5%
- Market cap
- $5.1T (shares as of 2026-07-17)
- P/E (trailing)
- 40.0 (EPS to 2026-06-27)
- Annual revenue
- $416.2B USD (FY ended 2025-09-27) 10-K
- Annual revenue growth
- +6.4% (FY ended 2025-09-27 vs FY ended 2024-09-28) 10-K
- Annual net income
- 112,010,000,000 USD (FY ended 2025-09-27, attributable to the company) 10-K
- Annual operating margin
- 32.0% (FY ended 2025-09-27)
- Forward P/E
- Unavailable: no dated forecast source
Gloria daily close for session Oct 29, 2026. Market cap and trailing P/E use this close with the SEC share total and trailing diluted earnings, each dated next to its figure. Annual revenue, revenue growth, net income and margin show their own fiscal period and link the 10-K. Current context may postdate this article.
Apple Inc. and its peers
| Company | Price | Market cap | P/E (trailing) | Forward P/E | Annual revenue (USD) | Annual revenue growth | Annual net income (USD) | Operating margin |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
$349 | $5.1T | 40.0 | Unavailable | $416.2BFY ended 2025-09-27 · 10-K | +6.4%FY ended 2025-09-27 vs 2024-09-28 · 10-K | 112,010,000,000FY ended 2025-09-27, attributable to the company · 10-K | 32.0%FY ended 2025-09-27 |
|
|
$476 | $304.3B | 27.7 | Unavailable | $113.5BFY ended 2026-01-30 · 10-K | +18.8%FY ended 2026-01-30 vs 2025-01-31 · 10-K | 5,936,000,000FY ended 2026-01-30, attributable to the company · 10-K | 7.2%FY ended 2026-01-30 |
|
|
$34 | $22.6B | 10.6 | Unavailable | $39.1BFY ended 2026-06-30 · 10-K | +77.8%FY ended 2026-06-30 vs 2025-06-30 · 10-K | 2,230,453,000FY ended 2026-06-30, attributable to the company · 10-K | 7.1%FY ended 2026-06-30 |
|
|
$109 | $428.1B | 32.6 | Unavailable | $63.3BFY ended 2026-07-25 · 10-K | +11.8%FY ended 2026-07-25 vs 2025-07-26 · 10-K | 13,267,000,000FY ended 2026-07-25, attributable to the company · 10-K | 24.3%FY ended 2026-07-25 |
Missing figures stay unavailable. Forward P/E requires a dated source. Annual revenue, revenue growth, net income and margin come from each company's own 10-K, in US dollars, and each row shows that fiscal year. Revenue growth compares the fiscal year with the prior year stated in the same 10-K. Net income is the full year amount attributable to the company, or available to common stockholders where the filing states only that, or consolidated net income. Each row names its basis. Trailing P/E reads "Not meaningful" when the dated trailing diluted EPS is a loss or zero. An operating margin appears only when the filing states both the operating income and the revenue for the same year.
Sources: SEC filings, Gloria daily closes and CoinGecko. Oldest record refresh: Oct 30, 2026, 8:56 AM EDT. Refresh is not a price or filing date. Each row shows its price date and its annual fiscal period. Peers use industry code and company size, or editorial selection. Market cap multiplies that row price by the company share total the latest SEC filing states for every share class together. Trailing P/E divides it by trailing diluted earnings from SEC filings. Rolled earnings per share are approximate because share counts can change between periods. Both appear only when the SEC data carries its date, so they are estimates at one price date, not synchronized filing valuations. Not investment advice.
Token vs underlying stock
Current comparison for AAPL. Historical observations may postdate this article.
AAPLx token unit vs AAPL share · USD
+11.9% over displayed period
● AAPLx token┄ AAPL stock: $348.91
Source: CoinGecko + Gloria · Retrieved Oct 30, 11:15 UTC
Methodology and data
Split-adjusted regular-session stock closes from the existing Gloria shared history, paired only with an observed token price within 45 minutes of 16:00 New York time. Up to 60 matched sessions. No interpolation or missing-date fill. Weekends and known early closes are omitted. Token units are not adjusted for issuer multipliers or dividend treatment. This compares quoted prices, not fair value, executable premiums or arbitrage returns. Solid line: token. Dashed line: stock. Exact quote times and values appear below. Historical observations. Retrieval refers to the token source. Token quote times use UTC. The fixed cohort shows its oldest member fetch.
| Date (UTC) | Token (USD) | Stock close (USD) | Token quote (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-08-06 | 312.78 | 312.41 | 2026-08-06 20:00 |
| 2026-08-07 | 313.83 | 313.33 | 2026-08-07 20:00 |
| 2026-08-10 | 308.62 | 308.26 | 2026-08-10 20:00 |
| 2026-08-11 | 305.37 | 304.91 | 2026-08-11 20:00 |
| 2026-08-12 | 302.83 | 302.25 | 2026-08-12 20:00 |
| 2026-08-13 | 305.79 | 305.26 | 2026-08-13 20:00 |
| 2026-08-14 | 306.96 | 305.93 | 2026-08-14 20:00 |
| 2026-08-17 | 306.25 | 305.59 | 2026-08-17 20:00 |
| 2026-08-18 | 311.31 | 310.03 | 2026-08-18 20:00 |
| 2026-08-19 | 317.34 | 316.83 | 2026-08-19 20:00 |
| 2026-08-20 | 311.74 | 311.30 | 2026-08-20 20:00 |
| 2026-08-21 | 310.51 | 309.35 | 2026-08-21 20:00 |
| 2026-08-24 | 311.44 | 310.34 | 2026-08-24 20:00 |
| 2026-08-25 | 310.87 | 309.90 | 2026-08-25 20:00 |
| 2026-08-26 | 314.52 | 313.45 | 2026-08-26 20:00 |
| 2026-08-27 | 315.05 | 314.58 | 2026-08-27 20:00 |
| 2026-08-28 | 320.36 | 319.70 | 2026-08-28 20:00 |
| 2026-08-31 | 317.65 | 316.85 | 2026-08-31 20:00 |
| 2026-09-01 | 325.59 | 325.13 | 2026-09-01 20:00 |
| 2026-09-02 | 325.80 | 324.96 | 2026-09-02 20:00 |
| 2026-09-03 | 329.13 | 328.21 | 2026-09-03 20:00 |
| 2026-09-04 | 321.11 | 319.97 | 2026-09-04 20:00 |
| 2026-09-08 | 316.85 | 316.22 | 2026-09-08 20:00 |
| 2026-09-09 | 316.30 | 315.34 | 2026-09-09 20:00 |
| 2026-09-10 | 327.20 | 326.57 | 2026-09-10 20:00 |
| 2026-09-11 | 333.36 | 332.27 | 2026-09-11 20:00 |
| 2026-09-14 | 334.25 | 333.08 | 2026-09-14 20:00 |
| 2026-09-15 | 331.88 | 331.34 | 2026-09-15 20:00 |
| 2026-09-16 | 333.36 | 332.41 | 2026-09-16 20:00 |
| 2026-09-17 | 337.97 | 337.00 | 2026-09-17 20:00 |
| 2026-09-18 | 337.26 | 336.13 | 2026-09-18 20:00 |
| 2026-09-21 | 340.11 | 338.98 | 2026-09-21 20:00 |
| 2026-09-22 | 340.64 | 339.75 | 2026-09-22 20:00 |
| 2026-09-23 | 337.57 | 337.02 | 2026-09-23 20:00 |
| 2026-09-24 | 337.27 | 335.92 | 2026-09-24 20:00 |
| 2026-09-25 | 341.92 | 341.07 | 2026-09-25 20:00 |
| 2026-09-28 | 339.71 | 338.40 | 2026-09-28 20:00 |
| 2026-09-29 | 330.45 | 329.40 | 2026-09-29 20:00 |
| 2026-09-30 | 334.56 | 333.02 | 2026-09-30 20:00 |
| 2026-10-01 | 331.46 | 330.32 | 2026-10-01 20:00 |
| 2026-10-02 | 334.68 | 333.69 | 2026-10-02 20:00 |
| 2026-10-05 | 333.54 | 332.89 | 2026-10-05 20:00 |
| 2026-10-06 | 334.55 | 333.63 | 2026-10-06 20:00 |
| 2026-10-07 | 337.28 | 336.67 | 2026-10-07 20:00 |
| 2026-10-08 | 341.31 | 340.42 | 2026-10-08 20:00 |
| 2026-10-09 | 337.58 | 336.64 | 2026-10-09 20:00 |
| 2026-10-12 | 341.95 | 340.97 | 2026-10-12 20:00 |
| 2026-10-13 | 342.44 | 341.27 | 2026-10-13 20:00 |
| 2026-10-14 | 344.06 | 342.96 | 2026-10-14 20:00 |
| 2026-10-15 | 343.24 | 342.00 | 2026-10-15 20:00 |
| 2026-10-16 | 344.31 | 343.46 | 2026-10-16 20:00 |
| 2026-10-19 | 344.18 | 342.94 | 2026-10-19 20:00 |
| 2026-10-20 | 340.65 | 339.50 | 2026-10-20 20:00 |
| 2026-10-21 | 344.81 | 343.99 | 2026-10-21 20:00 |
| 2026-10-22 | 349.21 | 348.22 | 2026-10-22 20:00 |
| 2026-10-23 | 348.46 | 347.73 | 2026-10-23 20:00 |
| 2026-10-26 | 344.87 | 343.91 | 2026-10-26 20:00 |
| 2026-10-27 | 348.00 | 347.10 | 2026-10-27 20:00 |
| 2026-10-28 | 345.12 | 343.83 | 2026-10-28 20:00 |
| 2026-10-29 | 350.00 | 348.91 | 2026-10-29 20:00 |
Stock history: Gloria · Retrieved Oct 30, 00:32 UTC. Token history: CoinGecko AAPLx.
Quoted token and share units can have different rights, multipliers and dividend treatment. This is not an executable premium or arbitrage signal.
Apple, a company famous for squeezing suppliers until they beg for mercy, just got told “no” by a Chinese chipmaker. Changxin Memory Technologies, better known as CXMT, rejected Apple’s request for discounted LPDDR5X memory pricing, instead demanding rates on par with Samsung and SK Hynix.
Here’s the thing: Apple wasn’t coming to CXMT out of generosity. It was coming out of desperation. The three companies that dominate the DRAM market, Samsung, SK Hynix, and Micron, have been pivoting hard toward high-bandwidth memory for AI applications, leaving mobile DRAM supply tighter and prices significantly higher.
The pricing squeeze Apple can’t escape
CXMT holds roughly 8% of the global DRAM market as of Q1 2026. That’s not nothing, but it’s still a fraction of what the big three control.
The company has recently begun mass-producing LPDDR5X memory with speeds up to 8533Mbps and capacities ranging from 12GB to 32GB. Those are flagship-tier specs, the kind Apple needs for its next-generation iPhones and iPads.
Pricing for 12GB LPDDR5X chips has reportedly surged to around $145, driven largely by the insatiable appetite for memory in AI workloads.
CXMT, rather than accepting the role of budget backup supplier, essentially told Apple: if you want our chips, pay what you’d pay Samsung. That’s a bold move from a company that, until recently, wasn’t even in the conversation for premium mobile memory.
Geopolitics makes everything harder
This isn’t just a supply-and-demand story. It’s a geopolitical chess match.
AI, tech, and the markets they move—in one daily briefing.
Daily. Free. Join 34,000+ readers across crypto, finance, and policy.
CXMT is a state-backed Chinese semiconductor company that sits on a US restrictions list. That means Apple can’t simply place an order and start shipping chips to Cupertino. The company is actively lobbying the US government for regulatory approvals to use CXMT’s memory in its products.
Apple’s motivation is straightforward. It wants to break the oligopoly that Samsung, SK Hynix, and Micron hold over its memory supply chain. Diversification reduces risk. But diversifying into a geopolitically sensitive supplier introduces entirely new risks.
Why the AI memory boom matters here
The root cause of Apple’s predicament is the AI infrastructure buildout. High-bandwidth memory, the specialized DRAM used in AI accelerators, commands significantly higher margins than mobile DRAM. Samsung and SK Hynix have rationally shifted production capacity toward HBM, where the money is better.
That leaves mobile DRAM in a structural supply deficit. Fewer wafers allocated to LPDDR5X means higher prices for every smartphone maker, not just Apple.
CXMT’s emergence as a viable LPDDR5X supplier should, in theory, help rebalance the market. But CXMT clearly has no interest in being the discount option. By demanding parity pricing with established players, it’s signaling that it views itself as a premium supplier, not a bargain bin alternative.
What this means for investors
For anyone holding Apple stock, this situation introduces a margin compression risk that’s worth watching closely. If Apple can’t secure cheaper memory, the cost of building each iPhone goes up. Apple then faces a choice: absorb the cost and accept lower margins, or pass it along to consumers through higher retail prices.
For memory semiconductor investors, the picture is more nuanced. Samsung and SK Hynix benefit from the current pricing environment, but CXMT’s growing capabilities represent a long-term competitive threat.
The US government’s decision on whether to grant Apple a waiver to use CXMT chips could be the single most important variable in this equation. A denial keeps the oligopoly intact and prices elevated. An approval opens a new front in the US-China tech competition, one where American companies are actively choosing Chinese suppliers over allied alternatives because the economics demand it.
Disclosure: This article was edited by Editorial Team. For more information on how we create and review content, see our Editorial Policy.
More in Technology
See all-
Broadridge sees growth potential in tokenization despite challenges
-
Intel credit default swaps hit a record 123.5 bps as AI spending jitters spread
-
Adrian Flux launches UK’s first domestic humanoid robot insurance policy
-
Bank of America says big tech bonds offer more opportunity than stocks
-
Trust Wallet to strengthen defenses after Binance, Polymarket attacks
-
Goldman Sachs finds AI layoffs leaving long-lasting scars on workers

