JPMorgan says Bitcoin has more upside than gold, and short sellers are the reason
Logo via Wikimedia Commons; treatment-A cover, license to verify on approval
A new report from JPMorgan highlights elevated short interest in Bitcoin ETFs as a coiled spring for potential price gains over gold.
JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) price
Full chart and statsLoading chart…
- Last close
- $339
- Close-to-close change
- +1.0%
- Market cap
- $901.9B (shares as of 2026-06-30)
- P/E (trailing)
- 14.5 (EPS to 2026-06-30)
- Annual revenue
- $182.4B USD (FY ended 2025-12-31) 10-K
- Annual revenue growth
- +2.8% (FY ended 2025-12-31 vs FY ended 2024-12-31) 10-K
- Annual net income
- 57,048,000,000 USD (FY ended 2025-12-31, attributable to the company) 10-K
- Annual operating margin
- Unavailable
- Forward P/E
- Unavailable: no dated forecast source
Gloria daily close for session Oct 28, 2026. Market cap and trailing P/E use this close with the SEC share total and trailing diluted earnings, each dated next to its figure. Annual revenue, revenue growth, net income and margin show their own fiscal period and link the 10-K. Current context may postdate this article.
JPMorgan Chase & Co. and its peers
| Company | Price | Market cap | P/E (trailing) | Forward P/E | Annual revenue (USD) | Annual revenue growth | Annual net income (USD) | Operating margin |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
$339 | $901.9B | 14.5 | Unavailable | $182.4BFY ended 2025-12-31 · 10-K | +2.8%FY ended 2025-12-31 vs 2024-12-31 · 10-K | 57,048,000,000FY ended 2025-12-31, attributable to the company · 10-K | Unavailable |
|
|
$51 | $355.6B | 11.7 | Unavailable | $113.1BFY ended 2025-12-31 · 10-K | +6.8%FY ended 2025-12-31 vs 2024-12-31 · 10-K | 30,509,000,000FY ended 2025-12-31, attributable to the company · 10-K | Unavailable |
|
|
$84 | $251.2B | 11.8 | Unavailable | $83.7BFY ended 2025-12-31 · 10-K | +1.7%FY ended 2025-12-31 vs 2024-12-31 · 10-K | 21,338,000,000FY ended 2025-12-31, attributable to the company · 10-K | Unavailable |
|
|
$124 | $208.2B | 13.4 | Unavailable | $85.2BFY ended 2025-12-31 · 10-K | +5.6%FY ended 2025-12-31 vs 2024-12-31 · 10-K | 14,306,000,000FY ended 2025-12-31, attributable to the company · 10-K | Unavailable |
Missing figures stay unavailable. Forward P/E requires a dated source. Annual revenue, revenue growth, net income and margin come from each company's own 10-K, in US dollars, and each row shows that fiscal year. Revenue growth compares the fiscal year with the prior year stated in the same 10-K. Net income is the full year amount attributable to the company, or available to common stockholders where the filing states only that, or consolidated net income. Each row names its basis. Trailing P/E reads "Not meaningful" when the dated trailing diluted EPS is a loss or zero. An operating margin appears only when the filing states both the operating income and the revenue for the same year.
Sources: SEC filings, Gloria daily closes and CoinGecko. Oldest record refresh: Oct 28, 2026, 5:41 PM EDT. Refresh is not a price or filing date. Each row shows its price date and its annual fiscal period. Peers use industry code and company size, or editorial selection. Market cap multiplies that row price by the company share total the latest SEC filing states for every share class together. Trailing P/E divides it by trailing diluted earnings from SEC filings. Rolled earnings per share are approximate because share counts can change between periods. Both appear only when the SEC data carries its date, so they are estimates at one price date, not synchronized filing valuations. Not investment advice.
JPMorgan’s latest research note makes a case that might surprise the gold bugs: Bitcoin has more room to run than the yellow metal right now, and the reasoning has less to do with crypto enthusiasm than with cold, structural market mechanics.
The bank’s analysts, led by Nikolaos Panigirtzoglou, published a report on September 16 arguing that Bitcoin’s upside advantage comes down to two factors. First, Bitcoin ETFs have recaptured far less of their 2026 outflows compared to gold ETFs. Second, and more importantly, the short interest piled up against BlackRock’s iShares Bitcoin Trust (IBIT) is creating the conditions for a potential squeeze that gold simply doesn’t have.
The short interest gap tells the story
The core of JPMorgan’s argument hinges on positioning data. IBIT’s short interest is sitting near its 2026 highs, meaning a significant number of traders are betting against the fund or using it as a hedge. Meanwhile, the SPDR Gold Shares ETF (GLD) has short interest that’s actually below its historical average.
The put-to-call open interest ratio for IBIT also remains elevated compared to GLD. In plain terms, options traders are paying up for downside protection on Bitcoin at a rate they simply aren’t for gold. That hedging demand creates an asymmetry: if fear subsides and those protective positions get unwound, the resulting flow benefits Bitcoin disproportionately.
JPMorgan’s analysts frame this as a mechanical advantage rather than a directional bet. They’re not saying Bitcoin is fundamentally better than gold. They’re saying the positioning around Bitcoin ETFs has created a tighter coil.
The news moving money, markets, and the world—before your day starts.
Daily. Free. Join 34,000+ readers across crypto, finance, and policy.
ETF flows reveal the imbalance
Since late July 2026, both gold and Bitcoin ETFs have seen meaningful inflows. But the recovery hasn’t been symmetric.
Gold ETFs have fully recovered all of their earlier 2026 outflows. Bitcoin ETFs, on the other hand, have only recaptured about 50% of theirs.
This is the first time JPMorgan’s analysis has focused specifically on ETF dynamics as a lens for comparing Bitcoin and gold’s relative upside potential. Previous reports from the bank have used volatility-adjusted metrics and broader flow analysis, but drilling into the put-to-call ratios and short interest of specific ETF products represents a new angle in the bank’s ongoing research.
What the report doesn’t say
Notably, JPMorgan’s report does not include new price targets for either Bitcoin or gold. The analysis is about relative positioning, not absolute levels. Panigirtzoglou and his team are describing market structure, not making a moonshot forecast.
No competing analysis from other major Wall Street institutions was reported alongside the JPMorgan note.
Disclosure: This article was edited by Editorial Team. For more information on how we create and review content, see our Editorial Policy.
More in Finance
See all-
Former FTX COO Constance Wang slams Netflix’s The Altruists and media coverage of the collapse
-
Pendle posts first TVL gain in a year as real-world assets take over
-
Alipay denies supporting crypto trading via third-party platforms
-
London Metal Exchange explores tokenizing Hong Kong warehouse metal for financing
-
Utah files criminal gambling charges against Kalshi and its co-founders
-
London Metal Exchange explores tokenizing off-warrant metal to boost revenue

