Former BNB Chain employee deploys ASTEROID token, sells for $638K

Via coolwallet.io

Former BNB Chain employee deploys ASTEROID token, sells for $638K

An insider used four freshly created wallets to scoop up nearly 80% of a meme token's supply for about $10K, then dumped it all as trading volume blew past $20 million.

Here’s a recipe for a crypto scandal: take one former employee with insider knowledge, add four brand-new wallets, sprinkle in a meme token nobody asked for, and cash out before anyone realizes what happened. That’s essentially what played out with $ASTEROID, a token deployed on BNB Chain that went from zero to nearly $10 million in market cap before cratering by more than 50% in just 20 minutes.

The former BNB Chain employee behind the launch reportedly acquired 796.7 million $ASTEROID tokens, roughly 79.67% of the total supply, for approximately $10,000. They then sold 718.8 million of those tokens for 1,103 BNB, pocketing between $628,000 and $638,000 in profit. In English: they turned ten grand into over six hundred thousand dollars by creating a token, buying most of it themselves, and selling into the hype.

Advertisement

The TST connection and the playbook

What makes this particularly uncomfortable for BNB Chain is the trail of breadcrumbs. The wallet used to deploy $ASTEROID was linked to a 2025 BNB Chain tutorial video that featured a token called TST. That tutorial was meant to be an educational demonstration, a harmless walkthrough of how token creation works on the chain. Instead, it became the digital fingerprint that connected the $ASTEROID deployer to their former employer.

The operation wasn’t exactly subtle. Four newly created wallets were used to accumulate the token supply, a pattern that on-chain sleuths tend to flag almost immediately. By the time the community connected the dots, $ASTEROID had already surged past $20 million in trading volume.

BNB Chain’s response

BNB Chain has moved to distance itself from the situation as aggressively as possible. The organization publicly stated that $ASTEROID has no affiliation with BNB Chain and initiated legal action against the former employee. BNB Chain has firmly affirmed that this individual acted independently and without any official sanction, reiterating that the company bears no responsibility or endorsement concerning the launch of $ASTEROID.

What this means for investors

For traders, the practical takeaway is unglamorous but important. Check wallet concentration before aping into any new token. Tools exist that show you what percentage of supply is held by the top wallets. If four wallets hold nearly 80% of a token launched hours ago, that’s not a buying opportunity. That’s a warning sign wearing a neon vest.

The $ASTEROID saga also raises questions about what obligations crypto companies have regarding former employees’ on-chain activity. Should there be cooling-off periods, similar to non-compete clauses in traditional finance, that restrict ex-employees from deploying tokens on chains they previously worked for? It’s the kind of governance question that sounds excessive until you watch someone turn $10K into $638K by exploiting their former employer’s tutorial infrastructure.

Disclosure: This article was edited by Editorial Team. For more information on how we create and review content, see our Editorial Policy.

Former BNB Chain employee deploys ASTEROID token, sells for $638K

Former BNB Chain employee deploys ASTEROID token, sells for $638K

An insider used four freshly created wallets to scoop up nearly 80% of a meme token's supply for about $10K, then dumped it all as trading volume blew past $20 million.

Via coolwallet.io

Here’s a recipe for a crypto scandal: take one former employee with insider knowledge, add four brand-new wallets, sprinkle in a meme token nobody asked for, and cash out before anyone realizes what happened. That’s essentially what played out with $ASTEROID, a token deployed on BNB Chain that went from zero to nearly $10 million in market cap before cratering by more than 50% in just 20 minutes.

The former BNB Chain employee behind the launch reportedly acquired 796.7 million $ASTEROID tokens, roughly 79.67% of the total supply, for approximately $10,000. They then sold 718.8 million of those tokens for 1,103 BNB, pocketing between $628,000 and $638,000 in profit. In English: they turned ten grand into over six hundred thousand dollars by creating a token, buying most of it themselves, and selling into the hype.

Advertisement

The TST connection and the playbook

What makes this particularly uncomfortable for BNB Chain is the trail of breadcrumbs. The wallet used to deploy $ASTEROID was linked to a 2025 BNB Chain tutorial video that featured a token called TST. That tutorial was meant to be an educational demonstration, a harmless walkthrough of how token creation works on the chain. Instead, it became the digital fingerprint that connected the $ASTEROID deployer to their former employer.

The operation wasn’t exactly subtle. Four newly created wallets were used to accumulate the token supply, a pattern that on-chain sleuths tend to flag almost immediately. By the time the community connected the dots, $ASTEROID had already surged past $20 million in trading volume.

BNB Chain’s response

BNB Chain has moved to distance itself from the situation as aggressively as possible. The organization publicly stated that $ASTEROID has no affiliation with BNB Chain and initiated legal action against the former employee. BNB Chain has firmly affirmed that this individual acted independently and without any official sanction, reiterating that the company bears no responsibility or endorsement concerning the launch of $ASTEROID.

What this means for investors

For traders, the practical takeaway is unglamorous but important. Check wallet concentration before aping into any new token. Tools exist that show you what percentage of supply is held by the top wallets. If four wallets hold nearly 80% of a token launched hours ago, that’s not a buying opportunity. That’s a warning sign wearing a neon vest.

The $ASTEROID saga also raises questions about what obligations crypto companies have regarding former employees’ on-chain activity. Should there be cooling-off periods, similar to non-compete clauses in traditional finance, that restrict ex-employees from deploying tokens on chains they previously worked for? It’s the kind of governance question that sounds excessive until you watch someone turn $10K into $638K by exploiting their former employer’s tutorial infrastructure.

Disclosure: This article was edited by Editorial Team. For more information on how we create and review content, see our Editorial Policy.