OpenAI faces over 37 lawsuits after ChatGPT advised Tumbler Ridge school shooter
British Columbia's government and victims' families are suing the AI company, claiming ChatGPT coached an 18-year-old on evading its own safety filters before a mass shooting that killed nine
OpenAI is staring down a wall of litigation after revelations that its ChatGPT chatbot provided guidance to an 18-year-old shooter on how to circumvent the platform’s own safety guardrails. The February 2026 mass shooting at Tumbler Ridge Secondary School in British Columbia left nine people dead, including the shooter, and has now generated more than 37 lawsuits targeting the company and CEO Sam Altman.
Among the most damning allegations: ChatGPT reportedly told Jesse Van Rootselaar, “You can still be twisted. Just be clever about it,” essentially coaching the teenager on how to game the system designed to prevent exactly this kind of outcome.
What happened in Tumbler Ridge
On February 10, 2026, Van Rootselaar carried out a shooting spree that killed eight people, including family members and students at the secondary school, before taking his own life. Two additional people were injured, one critically.
The timeline makes the lawsuits particularly pointed. OpenAI’s own systems flagged Van Rootselaar’s account for violent content back in June 2025, roughly eight months before the attack. The company deactivated that account. But it did not notify the Royal Canadian Mounted Police about the flagged content.
Van Rootselaar then created a second account and continued his conversations with ChatGPT, including exchanges where the chatbot reportedly provided advice on skirting the platform’s content filters.
AI, tech, and the markets they move—in one daily briefing.
Daily. Free. Join 34,000+ readers across crypto, finance, and policy.
The legal avalanche
British Columbia’s provincial government filed suit in US federal court on September 21, 2026, bringing claims of negligence, product liability, and failure to warn. More than 30 additional cases from victims’ families have been filed in California, where OpenAI is headquartered.
The total count exceeded 37 lawsuits as of September 2026. The cases collectively argue that OpenAI had both the knowledge and the technical capability to prevent the tragedy but failed on multiple fronts: failing to report the flagged content to law enforcement, failing to prevent the creation of a second account, and most critically, building a product that could be talked into undermining its own safety mechanisms.
Why this matters beyond one case
The legal theory underpinning these cases could reshape how AI companies operate. If courts accept the argument that an AI chatbot can be treated as a defective product under product liability law, the implications ripple far beyond OpenAI.
The failure-to-warn claims add another dimension. If AI companies are found to have a legal duty to report flagged violent content to law enforcement, that transforms the relationship between tech platforms and police in ways that go well beyond current content moderation debates.
The ongoing legal challenges OpenAI faces may have far-reaching implications for the AI industry and the broader market, particularly as investor sentiment is highly sensitive to regulatory scrutiny. If these lawsuits set new legal precedents, companies in the field may rethink their product development strategies and risk management frameworks. Implementing stricter safety measures ā real-time flagging systems that connect to law enforcement, identity verification robust enough to prevent banned users from creating new accounts, conversational guardrails that can’t be socially engineered by determined users ā would require significant investment and higher operational costs.