EU Regulator Ties Up Crypto Regulation Vote Over Proof-of-Work Ban

Shutterstock cover by S-F

EU Regulator Ties Up Crypto Regulation Vote Over Proof-of-Work Ban

A European Parliament member has canceled a vote on a long-awaited crypto regulation vote over fact-finding concerns.

The European Parliament has delayed its vote on the Markets in Crypto-assets Directive that was scheduled for Feb. 28 due to a provision that might ban Proof-of-Work. The vote could have sent a major proposal for crypto regulations into discussions with the Council of the European Union and the European Commission.Ā 

Leaked Draft of Crypto Bill Draws Ire

A key vote on crypto regulations that would affect roughly a half billion people has been delayed so that facts on Proof-of-Work can be gathered.

In 2019, the European Parliament proposed its regulatory package called Markets in Crypto-assets with the stated purpose of facilitating the ā€œpotential of digital finance in terms of innovation and competition while mitigating the risks.ā€ However, Stefan Berger, the rapporteur for the European Parliament’s Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs’ who was scheduled to vote on the Markets in Crypto-assets proposal, has called off the vote because of concerns that the proposal could be ā€œmisinterpreted as a de facto Bitcoin ban.ā€

Advertisement

Berger went on to discuss passages in the draft of the bill that could be seen as a Proof-of-Work ban, warning it ā€œwould be fatal if the #EU Parliament sent the wrong signal with a vote under these circumstances.ā€ The EU Parliament member noted the ā€œurgentā€ need to ā€œcreate clear factsā€ on Proof-of-Work in further discussions before the vote.Ā 

He concluded:Ā 

ā€œI will make another attempt with all stakeholders to reach a compromise that provides crypto assets with a proper legal framework but does not challenge Proof-of-Work.ā€

It appears that, while the Markets in Crypto-assets proposal states the importance of fostering innovation so Europe might be ā€œfit for the digital age,ā€ a later addition to the bill added the critical bit about Proof-of-Work that Berger and others expressed concern over. These drafts with Proof-of-Work bans made the rounds this week and drew ire.Ā 

The European Parliament decides upon European Union legislation alongside the Council of the European Union. The legislative body also plays a key role in the membership of the European Commission, which implements EU policies, such as by electing its President.Ā 

There have been rumblings—and outright support—for a Proof-of-Work mining ban in the European Union due to its environmental footprint. For example, the vice-chair of the European Securities and Markets Authority, Erik ThedĆ©en, called for a Proof-of-Work mining ban last month, favoring instead Proof-of-Stake.

Disclosure: At the time of writing, the author of this piece owned BTC, ETH, and several other cryptocurrencies.Ā 

Disclosure: This article was edited by Brooks Butler. For more information on how we create and review content, see our Editorial Policy.
EU Regulator Ties Up Crypto Regulation Vote Over Proof-of-Work Ban
EU Regulator Ties Up Crypto Regulation Vote Over Proof-of-Work Ban

A European Parliament member has canceled a vote on a long-awaited crypto regulation vote over fact-finding concerns.

Shutterstock cover by S-F

The European Parliament has delayed its vote on the Markets in Crypto-assets Directive that was scheduled for Feb. 28 due to a provision that might ban Proof-of-Work. The vote could have sent a major proposal for crypto regulations into discussions with the Council of the European Union and the European Commission.Ā 

Leaked Draft of Crypto Bill Draws Ire

A key vote on crypto regulations that would affect roughly a half billion people has been delayed so that facts on Proof-of-Work can be gathered.

In 2019, the European Parliament proposed its regulatory package called Markets in Crypto-assets with the stated purpose of facilitating the ā€œpotential of digital finance in terms of innovation and competition while mitigating the risks.ā€ However, Stefan Berger, the rapporteur for the European Parliament’s Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs’ who was scheduled to vote on the Markets in Crypto-assets proposal, has called off the vote because of concerns that the proposal could be ā€œmisinterpreted as a de facto Bitcoin ban.ā€

Advertisement

Berger went on to discuss passages in the draft of the bill that could be seen as a Proof-of-Work ban, warning it ā€œwould be fatal if the #EU Parliament sent the wrong signal with a vote under these circumstances.ā€ The EU Parliament member noted the ā€œurgentā€ need to ā€œcreate clear factsā€ on Proof-of-Work in further discussions before the vote.Ā 

He concluded:Ā 

ā€œI will make another attempt with all stakeholders to reach a compromise that provides crypto assets with a proper legal framework but does not challenge Proof-of-Work.ā€

It appears that, while the Markets in Crypto-assets proposal states the importance of fostering innovation so Europe might be ā€œfit for the digital age,ā€ a later addition to the bill added the critical bit about Proof-of-Work that Berger and others expressed concern over. These drafts with Proof-of-Work bans made the rounds this week and drew ire.Ā 

The European Parliament decides upon European Union legislation alongside the Council of the European Union. The legislative body also plays a key role in the membership of the European Commission, which implements EU policies, such as by electing its President.Ā 

There have been rumblings—and outright support—for a Proof-of-Work mining ban in the European Union due to its environmental footprint. For example, the vice-chair of the European Securities and Markets Authority, Erik ThedĆ©en, called for a Proof-of-Work mining ban last month, favoring instead Proof-of-Stake.

Disclosure: At the time of writing, the author of this piece owned BTC, ETH, and several other cryptocurrencies.Ā 

Disclosure: This article was edited by Brooks Butler. For more information on how we create and review content, see our Editorial Policy.