Off-balance sheet commitments tied to AI hit $3.1 trillion across nine tech giants
Hidden obligations from uncommenced leases and purchase orders now dwarf the combined on-balance-sheet debt of Alphabet, Amazon, Meta, Microsoft, and peers by a factor of three
+15.1% (FY ended 2025-12-31 vs FY ended 2024-12-31) 10-K
Annual net income
132,170,000,000 USD (FY ended 2025-12-31, attributable to the company) 10-K
Annual operating margin
32.0% (FY ended 2025-12-31)
Forward P/E
Unavailable: no dated forecast source
Gloria daily close for session Oct 27, 2026. Market cap and trailing P/E use this close with the SEC share total and trailing diluted earnings, each dated next to its figure. Annual revenue, revenue growth, net income and margin show their own fiscal period and link the 10-K. Current context may postdate this article.
Alphabet Inc. and its peers
Company
Price
Market cap
P/E (trailing)
Forward P/E
Annual revenue (USD)
Annual revenue growth
Annual net income (USD)
Operating margin
Alphabet Inc.
GOOGL · Price dated Oct 27, 2026 · tokenized GOOGLx
3,333,751,000FY ended 2025-12-31, attributable to the company · 10-K
75.8%FY ended 2025-12-31
Missing figures stay unavailable. Forward P/E requires a dated source. Annual revenue, revenue growth, net income and margin come from each company's own 10-K, in US dollars, and each row shows that fiscal year. Revenue growth compares the fiscal year with the prior year stated in the same 10-K. Net income is the full year amount attributable to the company, or available to common stockholders where the filing states only that, or consolidated net income. Each row names its basis. Trailing P/E reads "Not meaningful" when the dated trailing diluted EPS is a loss or zero. An operating margin appears only when the filing states both the operating income and the revenue for the same year.
Sources: SEC filings, Gloria daily closes and CoinGecko. Oldest record refresh: Oct 27, 2026, 10:51 PM EDT. Refresh is not a price or filing date. Each row shows its price date and its annual fiscal period. Peers use industry code and company size, or editorial selection. Market cap multiplies that row price by the company share total the latest SEC filing states for every share class together. Trailing P/E divides it by trailing diluted earnings from SEC filings. Rolled earnings per share are approximate because share counts can change between periods. Both appear only when the SEC data carries its date, so they are estimates at one price date, not synchronized filing valuations. Not investment advice.
Token vs underlying stock
Current comparison for GOOGL. Historical observations may postdate this article.
Split-adjusted regular-session stock closes from the existing Gloria shared history, paired only with an observed token price within 45 minutes of 16:00 New York time. Up to 60 matched sessions. No interpolation or missing-date fill. Weekends and known early closes are omitted. Token units are not adjusted for issuer multipliers or dividend treatment. This compares quoted prices, not fair value, executable premiums or arbitrage returns. Solid line: token. Dashed line: stock. Exact quote times and values appear below. Historical observations. Retrieval refers to the token source. Token quote times use UTC. The fixed cohort shows its oldest member fetch.
Alphabet token vs Alphabet stock: exact source values
Quoted token and share units can have different rights, multipliers and dividend treatment. This is not an executable premium or arbitrage signal.
Nine of the biggest names in tech have quietly stacked up roughly $3.1 trillion in financial commitments that don’t appear on their balance sheets, nearly all of it tied to artificial intelligence infrastructure. The figure grew by $1.3 trillion in just three months.
The companies in question: Alphabet, Amazon, Meta, Microsoft, Oracle, Nvidia, Broadcom, AMD, and SpaceX. Their collective off-balance-sheet obligations now outweigh their reported on-balance-sheet leases and long-term debts by roughly threefold, even as their combined annual capital expenditure sits around $600 billion.
What’s actually hiding off the books
The $3.1 trillion breaks down into two main buckets. About $1.2 trillion consists of uncommenced leases, essentially rental agreements for data centers, land, and facilities that haven’t kicked in yet. The remaining $1.9 trillion sits in purchase obligations, contractual commitments to buy chips, equipment, and other infrastructure components.
A Morgan Stanley report pegged the total at over $3.1 trillion when factoring in guarantees and leases from hyperscalers and chip firms. Hyperscalers’ guarantees alone reportedly exceed $2.7 trillion. These numbers sit in the footnotes of quarterly filings.
A Nikkei study from July estimated that five major tech firms’ hidden obligations stood at $1.65 trillion, representing an eightfold increase over four years.
AI, tech, and the markets they move—in one daily briefing.
Daily. Free. Join 34,000+ readers across crypto, finance, and policy.
Alphabet’s commitments nearly tripled in one quarter
No single company illustrates the velocity of this buildup better than Alphabet. The Google parent’s purchase commitments rose from $332 billion at the end of March to $811 billion by the end of June, a 152% increase in a single quarter.
The cash flow problem nobody wants to talk about
Some hyperscalers have already tipped into negative free cash flow as capital expenditures and commitment-related spending outpace revenue growth.
Off-balance-sheet obligations don’t trigger the same covenants or rating agency scrutiny as on-balance-sheet debt, which means these commitments can pile up with relatively little external friction. If AI demand does not materialize at scale, uncommenced leases still need to be honored or renegotiated and purchase obligations still need to be fulfilled or written off.
For context, $3.1 trillion is larger than the GDP of the United Kingdom. It’s roughly five times the annual capex these nine companies currently spend. And it grew by more than 70% in a single quarter.
Credit analysts have started flagging the adequacy of current disclosures. Morgan Stanley’s decision to publish an explicit tally suggests the sell side is growing uneasy with the gap between reported liabilities and actual contractual exposure.
Disclosure: This article was edited by Editorial Team. For more information on how we create and review content, see our Editorial Policy.
