Big Tech faces rising financing costs amid AI spending surge
Via joblist.com
The five largest US data-center spenders have piled up $350 billion in debt, and credit markets are starting to notice
Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) price
Full chart and statsLoading chart…
- Last close
- $531
- Close-to-close change
- −0.2%
- Market cap
- $3.9T (shares as of 2026-10-22)
- P/E (trailing)
- 27.7 (EPS to 2026-09-30)
- Annual revenue
- $331.8B USD (FY ended 2026-06-30) 10-K
- Annual revenue growth
- +17.8% (FY ended 2026-06-30 vs FY ended 2025-06-30) 10-K
- Annual net income
- 133,749,000,000 USD (FY ended 2026-06-30, attributable to the company) 10-K
- Annual operating margin
- 46.8% (FY ended 2026-06-30)
- Forward P/E
- Unavailable: no dated forecast source
Gloria daily close for session Oct 27, 2026. Market cap and trailing P/E use this close with the SEC share total and trailing diluted earnings, each dated next to its figure. Annual revenue, revenue growth, net income and margin show their own fiscal period and link the 10-K. Current context may postdate this article.
Microsoft Corporation and its peers
| Company | Price | Market cap | P/E (trailing) | Forward P/E | Annual revenue (USD) | Annual revenue growth | Annual net income (USD) | Operating margin |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
$531 | $3.9T | 27.7 | Unavailable | $331.8BFY ended 2026-06-30 · 10-K | +17.8%FY ended 2026-06-30 vs 2025-06-30 · 10-K | 133,749,000,000FY ended 2026-06-30, attributable to the company · 10-K | 46.8%FY ended 2026-06-30 |
|
|
$199 | $477.5B | 169.9 | Unavailable | $4.5BFY ended 2025-12-31 · 10-K | +56.2%FY ended 2025-12-31 vs 2024-12-31 · 10-K | 1,625,033,000FY ended 2025-12-31, attributable to the company · 10-K | 31.6%FY ended 2025-12-31 |
|
|
$131 | $394.7B | 20.5 | Unavailable | $67.4BFY ended 2026-05-31 · 10-K | +17.3%FY ended 2026-05-31 vs 2025-05-31 · 10-K | 17,087,000,000FY ended 2026-05-31, attributable to the company · 10-K | 30.6%FY ended 2026-05-31 |
|
|
$268 | $274.4B | Not meaningfulLoss, diluted EPS −0.45 to 2026-07-31 · SEC filing | Unavailable | $4.8BFY ended 2026-01-31 · 10-K | +21.7%FY ended 2026-01-31 vs 2025-01-31 · 10-K | −162,502,000FY ended 2026-01-31, attributable to the company · 10-K | −6.1%FY ended 2026-01-31 |
Missing figures stay unavailable. Forward P/E requires a dated source. Annual revenue, revenue growth, net income and margin come from each company's own 10-K, in US dollars, and each row shows that fiscal year. Revenue growth compares the fiscal year with the prior year stated in the same 10-K. Net income is the full year amount attributable to the company, or available to common stockholders where the filing states only that, or consolidated net income. Each row names its basis. Trailing P/E reads "Not meaningful" when the dated trailing diluted EPS is a loss or zero. An operating margin appears only when the filing states both the operating income and the revenue for the same year.
Sources: SEC filings, Gloria daily closes and CoinGecko. Oldest record refresh: Oct 28, 2026, 5:41 PM EDT. Refresh is not a price or filing date. Each row shows its price date and its annual fiscal period. Peers use industry code and company size, or editorial selection. Market cap multiplies that row price by the company share total the latest SEC filing states for every share class together. Trailing P/E divides it by trailing diluted earnings from SEC filings. Rolled earnings per share are approximate because share counts can change between periods. Both appear only when the SEC data carries its date, so they are estimates at one price date, not synchronized filing valuations. Not investment advice.
Token vs underlying stock
Current comparison for MSFT. Historical observations may postdate this article.
MSFTx token unit vs MSFT share · USD
+6.9% over displayed period
● MSFTx token┄ MSFT stock: $531.33
Source: CoinGecko + Gloria · Retrieved Oct 28, 21:51 UTC · Delayed
Methodology and data
Split-adjusted regular-session stock closes from the existing Gloria shared history, paired only with an observed token price within 45 minutes of 16:00 New York time. Up to 60 matched sessions. No interpolation or missing-date fill. Weekends and known early closes are omitted. Token units are not adjusted for issuer multipliers or dividend treatment. This compares quoted prices, not fair value, executable premiums or arbitrage returns. Solid line: token. Dashed line: stock. Exact quote times and values appear below. Historical observations. Retrieval refers to the token source. Token quote times use UTC. The fixed cohort shows its oldest member fetch.
| Date (UTC) | Token (USD) | Stock close (USD) | Token quote (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-08-04 | 499.08 | 492.81 | 2026-08-04 20:00 |
| 2026-08-05 | 484.73 | 487.46 | 2026-08-05 20:00 |
| 2026-08-06 | 498.48 | 499.86 | 2026-08-06 20:00 |
| 2026-08-07 | 501.35 | 499.99 | 2026-08-07 20:00 |
| 2026-08-10 | 507.81 | 506.06 | 2026-08-10 20:00 |
| 2026-08-11 | 503.83 | 503.81 | 2026-08-11 20:00 |
| 2026-08-12 | 493.50 | 492.43 | 2026-08-12 20:00 |
| 2026-08-13 | 494.66 | 496.88 | 2026-08-13 20:00 |
| 2026-08-14 | 496.96 | 495.40 | 2026-08-14 20:00 |
| 2026-08-17 | 481.91 | 480.35 | 2026-08-17 20:00 |
| 2026-08-18 | 482.93 | 481.63 | 2026-08-18 20:00 |
| 2026-08-19 | 484.48 | 484.31 | 2026-08-19 20:00 |
| 2026-08-20 | 482.95 | 481.15 | 2026-08-20 20:00 |
| 2026-08-21 | 485.28 | 483.24 | 2026-08-21 20:00 |
| 2026-08-24 | 489.80 | 487.31 | 2026-08-24 20:00 |
| 2026-08-25 | 491.36 | 491.71 | 2026-08-25 20:00 |
| 2026-08-26 | 498.86 | 496.37 | 2026-08-26 20:00 |
| 2026-08-27 | 506.15 | 505.06 | 2026-08-27 20:00 |
| 2026-08-28 | 514.87 | 513.53 | 2026-08-28 20:00 |
| 2026-08-31 | 510.07 | 507.29 | 2026-08-31 20:00 |
| 2026-09-01 | 503.61 | 501.02 | 2026-09-01 20:00 |
| 2026-09-02 | 497.76 | 496.82 | 2026-09-02 20:00 |
| 2026-09-03 | 512.63 | 510.12 | 2026-09-03 20:00 |
| 2026-09-04 | 500.58 | 499.70 | 2026-09-04 20:00 |
| 2026-09-08 | 493.27 | 493.95 | 2026-09-08 20:00 |
| 2026-09-09 | 491.69 | 491.65 | 2026-09-09 20:00 |
| 2026-09-10 | 493.07 | 492.44 | 2026-09-10 20:00 |
| 2026-09-11 | 498.52 | 495.63 | 2026-09-11 20:00 |
| 2026-09-14 | 508.54 | 505.41 | 2026-09-14 20:00 |
| 2026-09-15 | 498.86 | 497.12 | 2026-09-15 20:00 |
| 2026-09-16 | 494.48 | 490.30 | 2026-09-16 20:00 |
| 2026-09-17 | 500.28 | 497.75 | 2026-09-17 20:00 |
| 2026-09-18 | 496.33 | 493.78 | 2026-09-18 20:00 |
| 2026-09-21 | 503.22 | 501.61 | 2026-09-21 20:00 |
| 2026-09-22 | 501.25 | 498.00 | 2026-09-22 20:00 |
| 2026-09-23 | 503.06 | 500.59 | 2026-09-23 20:00 |
| 2026-09-24 | 501.07 | 497.93 | 2026-09-24 20:00 |
| 2026-09-25 | 518.98 | 516.17 | 2026-09-25 20:00 |
| 2026-09-28 | 511.70 | 509.22 | 2026-09-28 20:00 |
| 2026-09-29 | 512.06 | 508.96 | 2026-09-29 20:00 |
| 2026-09-30 | 515.27 | 512.90 | 2026-09-30 20:00 |
| 2026-10-01 | 516.84 | 512.80 | 2026-10-01 20:00 |
| 2026-10-02 | 519.95 | 517.53 | 2026-10-02 20:00 |
| 2026-10-05 | 527.35 | 525.18 | 2026-10-05 20:00 |
| 2026-10-06 | 532.35 | 529.30 | 2026-10-06 20:00 |
| 2026-10-07 | 532.01 | 529.76 | 2026-10-07 20:00 |
| 2026-10-08 | 525.93 | 522.61 | 2026-10-08 20:00 |
| 2026-10-09 | 537.45 | 535.07 | 2026-10-09 20:00 |
| 2026-10-12 | 543.48 | 541.15 | 2026-10-12 20:00 |
| 2026-10-13 | 546.06 | 543.45 | 2026-10-13 20:00 |
| 2026-10-14 | 535.70 | 533.69 | 2026-10-14 20:00 |
| 2026-10-15 | 542.43 | 539.44 | 2026-10-15 20:00 |
| 2026-10-16 | 531.87 | 529.05 | 2026-10-16 20:00 |
| 2026-10-19 | 535.69 | 533.52 | 2026-10-19 20:00 |
| 2026-10-20 | 535.30 | 531.87 | 2026-10-20 20:00 |
| 2026-10-21 | 535.87 | 532.95 | 2026-10-21 20:00 |
| 2026-10-22 | 524.11 | 521.08 | 2026-10-22 20:00 |
| 2026-10-23 | 525.75 | 524.51 | 2026-10-23 20:00 |
| 2026-10-26 | 534.07 | 532.60 | 2026-10-26 20:00 |
| 2026-10-27 | 533.36 | 531.33 | 2026-10-27 20:00 |
Stock history: Gloria · Retrieved Oct 28, 00:31 UTC. Token history: CoinGecko MSFTx.
Quoted token and share units can have different rights, multipliers and dividend treatment. This is not an executable premium or arbitrage signal.
For years, Big Tech companies printed cash faster than they could spend it. Those days are over. The AI infrastructure buildout has turned the industry’s most profitable companies into some of the bond market’s most prolific borrowers, and the cost of all that debt is climbing.
The combined debt of the five largest US data-center spenders, Microsoft, Alphabet, Amazon, Meta, and Oracle, has ballooned to roughly $350 billion over the past five years. Their collective interest expenses topped $10 billion in the last year alone, more than double what they were paying in 2019.
The debt machine revs up
Goldman Sachs estimates that AI-related corporate debt issuance will hit approximately $141 billion in 2025. That figure is being driven by blockbuster bond deals from Meta, Alphabet, and Oracle, companies that historically financed their growth through cash flows rather than credit markets.
Meta’s recent $12.5 billion bond offering for a Texas data center carried notably higher yields than Meta’s comparable bond issuance earlier in 2025. Oracle’s credit default swap spreads have also been widening, signaling that the market views the risk of lending to these companies as incrementally higher than before.
UBS projects that new tech debt supply could rise to $900 billion by 2026. Morgan Stanley and JPMorgan have penciled in total AI infrastructure borrowing needs of $1.5 trillion by 2028.
AI, tech, and the markets they move—in one daily briefing.
Daily. Free. Join 34,000+ readers across crypto, finance, and policy.
Where all the money is going
Hyperscalers are projected to spend approximately $490 billion on infrastructure in 2026, a figure that has been revised upward from earlier estimates. Combined capital expenditures for Microsoft, Amazon, Alphabet, and Meta alone may reach around $725 billion in the near future.
Winners, losers, and what investors should watch
Oracle’s credit spreads have widened more noticeably, reflecting investor concern about a company with a smaller revenue base taking on substantial debt to compete in the AI infrastructure race.
For credit market investors, the flood of tech debt creates a saturation problem. When $141 billion in AI-related bonds hits the market in a single year, supply starts to overwhelm demand. That dynamic pushes yields higher across the board, meaning even the strongest borrowers pay more than they otherwise would.
Traders should be watching credit spreads as a leading indicator. Widening CDS spreads and higher yields on new issuances are the market’s way of saying it’s getting nervous. That nervousness hasn’t reached alarm levels yet, but $1.5 trillion in projected borrowing needs by 2028 is the kind of number that tends to concentrate minds.
Disclosure: This article was edited by Editorial Team. For more information on how we create and review content, see our Editorial Policy.
More in AI
See all-
TikTok researchers warn that MCP tools can quietly turn AI agents against their users
-
Trump flags imported robotics as a national security risk, holds off on tariffs
-
Alphabet and Microsoft post strong cloud growth as AI partnerships turn complicated
-
Google’s engineering benchmark finds top AI agents scoring just 50.6%
-
Fed Chair Kevin Warsh does not see AI growth as necessarily inflationary, says Tom Lee
-
Google begins testing ads in AI Mode for Personal Intelligence users

