Bitcoin whale that sold near $89,000 buys back 3,000 BTC at lower prices
A long-quiet wallet withdrew 3,009 BTC worth roughly $228 million from Binance, according to on-chain data from Lookonchain
A Bitcoin whale that went quiet for more than a year is back, and it came back with a shopping list. The wallet pulled 3,009 BTC, worth approximately $228 million at the time, off Binance, according to on-chain analytics firm Lookonchain.
The timing is the interesting part. This is the same address that previously sent 5,699 BTC to Binance when Bitcoin was trading near $89,000. It is now taking coins back at a noticeably lower price.
What the wallet did
Lookonchain flagged the activity on November 6, 2026. It described the movement as the address’s first significant on-chain action in over a year.
The withdrawals did not happen in one big transfer. They came in several tranches. One batch moved 437 BTC, worth about $33 million. Four more batches moved roughly 643 BTC each.
Add those up and you get the 3,009 BTC total. Market coverage of the move rounded that to 3,000 BTC worth $230 million, accumulated over two days.
Bitcoin was changing hands at around $75,000 to $76,000 while this was happening. That sits well below the roughly $89,000 level where the same wallet had earlier been depositing coins onto the exchange.
Lookonchain and Arkham Intelligence supplied the primary data behind the reports. Despite the size of the transfers, the wallet remains unlabeled. Nobody has publicly tied a name, fund, or company to it.
A partial buyback, not fresh money
This address had previously deposited 5,699 BTC into Binance. Coverage of the whale describes it as having sold its holdings in late 2024 and early 2025. Moving coins onto an exchange is often the first step toward selling them, since that is where the buyers are.
The crypto and markets news you actually need—every morning.
Daily. Free. Join 34,000+ readers across crypto, finance, and policy.
The latest withdrawals cover 3,009 of those 5,699 coins. That works out to a little more than half of what the wallet previously sent to Binance.
So the more accurate framing is a partial buyback. The whale appears to be rebuilding a position it previously wound down, rather than deploying money that was never in Bitcoin to begin with.
Why exchange withdrawals get attention
When someone buys Bitcoin and leaves it on the exchange, nothing much shows up on-chain. When that buyer moves the coins to a private wallet, the transfer becomes visible to anyone watching. Analytics firms like Lookonchain and Arkham track these flows and flag the large ones.
Splitting the withdrawal into tranches is also worth noting. Moving 3,009 BTC across five transfers rather than one does not change the economics. It does suggest a deliberate, staged approach rather than a single impulsive move.
What this means for the market
A wallet that sold near $89,000 and is now buying back around $75,000 to $76,000 is effectively signaling that it thinks current prices look attractive.
There is also a supply angle. Coins sitting in a private wallet are not available on the exchange order book. When a single holder removes a few thousand BTC from Binance, the pool of coins readily available for sale gets a little smaller.
Still, one whale does not make a trend. A single unlabeled wallet moving $228 million is meaningful but not decisive for an asset of Bitcoin’s size. It is also worth remembering that the whale only bought back about half of what it previously deposited.
The things to watch from here are fairly simple. Does this wallet keep withdrawing from Binance until it rebuilds toward its earlier 5,699 BTC position? Do other dormant addresses follow with similar outflows? And does the coin stay put in cold storage, or reappear on an exchange later?
If the remaining 2,690 or so coins come back off the exchange, the buyback story gets much stronger. Either way, Lookonchain and Arkham will likely be the first to notice.
Disclosure: This article was edited by Vivian Nguyen. For more information on how we create and review content, see our Editorial Policy.

