+65.5% (FY ended 2026-01-25 vs FY ended 2025-01-26) 10-K
Annual net income
120,067,000,000 USD (FY ended 2026-01-25, attributable to the company) 10-K
Annual operating margin
60.4% (FY ended 2026-01-25)
Forward P/E
Unavailable: no dated forecast source
Gloria daily close for session Oct 27, 2026. Market cap and trailing P/E use this close with the SEC share total and trailing diluted earnings, each dated next to its figure. Annual revenue, revenue growth, net income and margin show their own fiscal period and link the 10-K. Current context may postdate this article.
4,335,000,000FY ended 2025-12-27, attributable to the company · 10-K
10.7%FY ended 2025-12-27
Missing figures stay unavailable. Forward P/E requires a dated source. Annual revenue, revenue growth, net income and margin come from each company's own 10-K, in US dollars, and each row shows that fiscal year. Revenue growth compares the fiscal year with the prior year stated in the same 10-K. Net income is the full year amount attributable to the company, or available to common stockholders where the filing states only that, or consolidated net income. Each row names its basis. Trailing P/E reads "Not meaningful" when the dated trailing diluted EPS is a loss or zero. An operating margin appears only when the filing states both the operating income and the revenue for the same year.
Sources: SEC filings, Gloria daily closes and CoinGecko. Oldest record refresh: Oct 28, 2026, 5:46 PM EDT. Refresh is not a price or filing date. Each row shows its price date and its annual fiscal period. Peers use industry code and company size, or editorial selection. Market cap multiplies that row price by the company share total the latest SEC filing states for every share class together. Trailing P/E divides it by trailing diluted earnings from SEC filings. Rolled earnings per share are approximate because share counts can change between periods. Both appear only when the SEC data carries its date, so they are estimates at one price date, not synchronized filing valuations. Not investment advice.
Token vs underlying stock
Current comparison for NVDA. Historical observations may postdate this article.
Split-adjusted regular-session stock closes from the existing Gloria shared history, paired only with an observed token price within 45 minutes of 16:00 New York time. Up to 60 matched sessions. No interpolation or missing-date fill. Weekends and known early closes are omitted. Token units are not adjusted for issuer multipliers or dividend treatment. This compares quoted prices, not fair value, executable premiums or arbitrage returns. Solid line: token. Dashed line: stock. Exact quote times and values appear below. Historical observations. Retrieval refers to the token source. Token quote times use UTC. The fixed cohort shows its oldest member fetch.
Nvidia token vs Nvidia stock: exact source values
Date (UTC)
Token (USD)
Stock close (USD)
Token quote (UTC)
2026-08-04
212.33
211.94
2026-08-04 20:00
2026-08-05
219.87
219.22
2026-08-05 20:00
2026-08-06
219.15
218.99
2026-08-06 20:00
2026-08-07
223.93
223.96
2026-08-07 20:00
2026-08-10
217.66
217.55
2026-08-10 20:00
2026-08-11
217.53
217.50
2026-08-11 20:00
2026-08-12
224.12
224.09
2026-08-12 20:00
2026-08-13
225.42
225.30
2026-08-13 20:00
2026-08-14
225.34
225.16
2026-08-14 20:00
2026-08-17
225.13
225.01
2026-08-17 20:00
2026-08-18
219.70
219.74
2026-08-18 20:00
2026-08-19
217.76
217.56
2026-08-19 20:00
2026-08-20
216.79
216.85
2026-08-20 20:00
2026-08-21
214.85
214.72
2026-08-21 20:00
2026-08-24
208.75
208.48
2026-08-24 20:00
2026-08-25
213.16
213.05
2026-08-25 20:00
2026-08-26
210.06
209.66
2026-08-26 20:00
2026-08-27
227.96
227.98
2026-08-27 20:00
2026-08-28
217.74
217.55
2026-08-28 20:00
2026-08-31
220.91
220.78
2026-08-31 20:00
2026-09-01
217.58
217.44
2026-09-01 20:00
2026-09-02
224.46
224.41
2026-09-02 20:00
2026-09-03
228.90
228.45
2026-09-03 20:00
2026-09-04
230.35
230.36
2026-09-04 20:00
2026-09-08
225.69
225.73
2026-09-08 20:00
2026-09-09
223.89
223.67
2026-09-09 20:00
2026-09-10
218.70
218.36
2026-09-10 20:00
2026-09-11
218.92
218.29
2026-09-11 20:00
2026-09-14
211.47
210.96
2026-09-14 20:00
2026-09-15
212.34
212.17
2026-09-15 20:00
2026-09-16
214.25
213.90
2026-09-16 20:00
2026-09-17
219.68
219.34
2026-09-17 20:00
2026-09-18
222.24
222.27
2026-09-18 20:00
2026-09-21
227.69
227.38
2026-09-21 20:00
2026-09-22
229.20
228.87
2026-09-22 20:00
2026-09-23
225.44
225.51
2026-09-23 20:00
2026-09-24
224.87
224.58
2026-09-24 20:00
2026-09-25
225.29
225.07
2026-09-25 20:00
2026-09-28
228.97
228.86
2026-09-28 20:00
2026-09-29
227.95
227.21
2026-09-29 20:00
2026-09-30
229.85
228.38
2026-09-30 20:00
2026-10-01
231.18
230.86
2026-10-01 20:00
2026-10-02
234.38
233.95
2026-10-02 20:00
2026-10-05
239.30
238.90
2026-10-05 20:00
2026-10-06
239.71
239.24
2026-10-06 20:00
2026-10-07
237.80
237.47
2026-10-07 20:00
2026-10-08
230.81
230.48
2026-10-08 20:00
2026-10-09
229.70
229.28
2026-10-09 20:00
2026-10-12
226.87
226.32
2026-10-12 20:00
2026-10-13
228.73
228.52
2026-10-13 20:00
2026-10-14
221.56
221.30
2026-10-14 20:00
2026-10-15
217.48
217.23
2026-10-15 20:00
2026-10-16
214.56
214.13
2026-10-16 20:00
2026-10-19
217.41
217.09
2026-10-19 20:00
2026-10-20
216.69
216.47
2026-10-20 20:00
2026-10-21
222.20
221.97
2026-10-21 20:00
2026-10-22
212.42
212.21
2026-10-22 20:00
2026-10-23
211.27
210.96
2026-10-23 20:00
2026-10-26
216.15
216.00
2026-10-26 20:00
2026-10-27
218.06
217.94
2026-10-27 20:00
Stock history: Gloria · Retrieved Oct 28, 00:31 UTC. Token history: CoinGecko NVDAx.
Quoted token and share units can have different rights, multipliers and dividend treatment. This is not an executable premium or arbitrage signal.
France’s top antitrust enforcer is wrapping up its investigation into Nvidia, a probe that started with unannounced raids nearly three years ago and could result in one of the most consequential regulatory actions against a major AI chipmaker to date.
The French Competition Authority’s general rapporteur confirmed the investigation is nearing completion.
From dawn raids to the finish line
The investigation traces back to September 2023, when French authorities conducted unannounced inspections at Nvidia’s offices in Paris and Nice. Those raids targeted suspected anti-competitive behavior specifically in the graphics card sector.
By July 2024, the French Competition Authority formally confirmed the probe’s existence. A month earlier, in June 2024, the authority had published an opinion that zeroed in on a specific concern: the industry’s over-reliance on Nvidia’s CUDA software platform.
CUDA is Nvidia’s proprietary programming framework for GPU computing. The authority flagged it as the only fully compatible software for key GPUs.
The news moving money, markets, and the world—before your day starts.
Daily. Free. Join 34,000+ readers across crypto, finance, and policy.
No specific charges or formal timeline for the investigation’s conclusion have been publicly disclosed. As of July 2026, the period between formal confirmation in mid-2024 and now has been marked by regulatory silence.
What’s actually at stake
If the French Competition Authority finds Nvidia engaged in anti-competitive practices, the company could face fines of up to 10% of its global revenue.
The French authority’s focus on CUDA dependency reflects concern that software ecosystem lock-in can be anticompetitive. The June 2024 opinion highlighted that every major cloud provider builds AI infrastructure around Nvidia GPUs running CUDA.
Why crypto and AI investors should pay attention
Nvidia’s GPUs are essential infrastructure for AI model training, high-performance computing, cryptocurrency mining operations, and blockchain-related AI applications. Any regulatory action that constrains Nvidia’s market behavior or forces changes to its software licensing could ripple through multiple sectors simultaneously.
A forced opening of Nvidia’s software ecosystem could theoretically benefit competitors like AMD and Intel, potentially diversifying the hardware landscape that crypto miners and AI-focused blockchain projects rely on.
Disclosure: This article was edited by Editorial Team. For more information on how we create and review content, see our Editorial Policy.
