JPMorgan reports stalled inflows for Hyperliquid ETF amid competition
Via thecoinrepublic.com
After a hot debut that briefly outpaced Bitcoin ETFs on a market-cap-adjusted basis, HYPE's spot funds are bleeding capital as altcoin ETF competition heats up
JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) price
Full chart and statsLoading chart…
- Last close
- $336
- Close-to-close change
- +0.5%
- Market cap
- $892.6B (shares as of 2026-06-30)
- P/E (trailing)
- 14.4 (EPS to 2026-06-30)
- Annual revenue
- $182.4B USD (FY ended 2025-12-31) 10-K
- Annual revenue growth
- +2.8% (FY ended 2025-12-31 vs FY ended 2024-12-31) 10-K
- Annual net income
- 57,048,000,000 USD (FY ended 2025-12-31, attributable to the company) 10-K
- Annual operating margin
- Unavailable
- Forward P/E
- Unavailable: no dated forecast source
Gloria daily close for session Oct 27, 2026. Market cap and trailing P/E use this close with the SEC share total and trailing diluted earnings, each dated next to its figure. Annual revenue, revenue growth, net income and margin show their own fiscal period and link the 10-K. Current context may postdate this article.
JPMorgan Chase & Co. and its peers
| Company | Price | Market cap | P/E (trailing) | Forward P/E | Annual revenue (USD) | Annual revenue growth | Annual net income (USD) | Operating margin |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
$336 | $892.6B | 14.4 | Unavailable | $182.4BFY ended 2025-12-31 · 10-K | +2.8%FY ended 2025-12-31 vs 2024-12-31 · 10-K | 57,048,000,000FY ended 2025-12-31, attributable to the company · 10-K | Unavailable |
|
|
$51 | $354.4B | 11.7 | Unavailable | $113.1BFY ended 2025-12-31 · 10-K | +6.8%FY ended 2025-12-31 vs 2024-12-31 · 10-K | 30,509,000,000FY ended 2025-12-31, attributable to the company · 10-K | Unavailable |
|
|
$83 | $250.0B | 12.0 | Unavailable | $83.7BFY ended 2025-12-31 · 10-K | +1.7%FY ended 2025-12-31 vs 2024-12-31 · 10-K | 21,338,000,000FY ended 2025-12-31, attributable to the company · 10-K | Unavailable |
|
|
$123 | $205.8B | 13.2 | Unavailable | $85.2BFY ended 2025-12-31 · 10-K | +5.6%FY ended 2025-12-31 vs 2024-12-31 · 10-K | 14,306,000,000FY ended 2025-12-31, attributable to the company · 10-K | Unavailable |
Missing figures stay unavailable. Forward P/E requires a dated source. Annual revenue, revenue growth, net income and margin come from each company's own 10-K, in US dollars, and each row shows that fiscal year. Revenue growth compares the fiscal year with the prior year stated in the same 10-K. Net income is the full year amount attributable to the company, or available to common stockholders where the filing states only that, or consolidated net income. Each row names its basis. Trailing P/E reads "Not meaningful" when the dated trailing diluted EPS is a loss or zero. An operating margin appears only when the filing states both the operating income and the revenue for the same year.
Sources: SEC filings, Gloria daily closes and CoinGecko. Oldest record refresh: Oct 27, 2026, 9:36 PM EDT. Refresh is not a price or filing date. Each row shows its price date and its annual fiscal period. Peers use industry code and company size, or editorial selection. Market cap multiplies that row price by the company share total the latest SEC filing states for every share class together. Trailing P/E divides it by trailing diluted earnings from SEC filings. Rolled earnings per share are approximate because share counts can change between periods. Both appear only when the SEC data carries its date, so they are estimates at one price date, not synchronized filing valuations. Not investment advice.
Hyperliquid’s spot ETFs went from Wall Street darling to cautionary tale in about two months. After launching in mid-May to considerable fanfare, the HYPE token’s exchange-traded products have now posted nearly $30 million in net outflows, according to JPMorgan, as investors rotate into competing altcoin wrappers and broader market sentiment cools.
The reversal is striking given how the debut went. On May 20, HYPE ETFs pulled in $25.5 million in a single day, a figure that actually outperformed Bitcoin ETFs on a market-cap-adjusted basis during multiple of their own debut sessions. By late May, cumulative net inflows had reached roughly $75 million. By June and July, that number had swelled to around $280 million.
From record inflows to red ink
The party didn’t last. July marked the inflection point, with more than $13 million in net outflows reported for the month. The bleeding continued into August, with a $29.8 million net outflow streak extending across twelve consecutive sessions through August 3.
HYPE’s price dropped approximately 13% from its June peaks during July. Two spot HYPE products, BHYP and THYP, launched between May 12 and May 15. They represent the first US-listed spot ETFs for the decentralized perpetuals exchange’s native token, a milestone that initially generated significant trading volume in the hundreds of millions of dollars. But even at their peak, these products remained dwarfed by flagship Bitcoin and Ethereum funds.
The altcoin ETF arms race
JPMorgan’s analysis points to mounting competition as a key factor in the stalled flows. Products tied to Ethereum, Solana, and other tokens are competing for the same pool of investor capital.
Macro, rates, and crypto—what moved markets and what matters next.
Daily. Free. Join 34,000+ readers across crypto, finance, and policy.
The buyback buffer
Hyperliquid’s Assistance Fund funnels approximately 99% of the platform’s trading fees into purchasing HYPE tokens on the open market. These buybacks have totaled over $1 billion in certain periods, a figure that makes the ETF’s $280 million peak inflows look like a rounding error.
This creates an unusual dynamic for HYPE relative to other altcoin ETF tokens. HYPE has a structural buyer that operates independently of Wall Street sentiment, which acts as a floor, though not an invincible one given the 13% July drawdown.
Investors watching the HYPE ETF space should track three metrics: daily net fund flows for BHYP and THYP, Hyperliquid’s platform trading volume as a proxy for buyback firepower, and the launch calendar for competing altcoin ETFs that could further fragment attention.
Disclosure: This article was edited by Editorial Team. For more information on how we create and review content, see our Editorial Policy.

