+65.5% (FY ended 2026-01-25 vs FY ended 2025-01-26) 10-K
Annual net income
120,067,000,000 USD (FY ended 2026-01-25, attributable to the company) 10-K
Annual operating margin
60.4% (FY ended 2026-01-25)
Forward P/E
Unavailable: no dated forecast source
Gloria daily close for session Oct 27, 2026. Market cap and trailing P/E use this close with the SEC share total and trailing diluted earnings, each dated next to its figure. Annual revenue, revenue growth, net income and margin show their own fiscal period and link the 10-K. Current context may postdate this article.
4,335,000,000FY ended 2025-12-27, attributable to the company · 10-K
10.7%FY ended 2025-12-27
Missing figures stay unavailable. Forward P/E requires a dated source. Annual revenue, revenue growth, net income and margin come from each company's own 10-K, in US dollars, and each row shows that fiscal year. Revenue growth compares the fiscal year with the prior year stated in the same 10-K. Net income is the full year amount attributable to the company, or available to common stockholders where the filing states only that, or consolidated net income. Each row names its basis. Trailing P/E reads "Not meaningful" when the dated trailing diluted EPS is a loss or zero. An operating margin appears only when the filing states both the operating income and the revenue for the same year.
Sources: SEC filings, Gloria daily closes and CoinGecko. Oldest record refresh: Oct 28, 2026, 5:46 PM EDT. Refresh is not a price or filing date. Each row shows its price date and its annual fiscal period. Peers use industry code and company size, or editorial selection. Market cap multiplies that row price by the company share total the latest SEC filing states for every share class together. Trailing P/E divides it by trailing diluted earnings from SEC filings. Rolled earnings per share are approximate because share counts can change between periods. Both appear only when the SEC data carries its date, so they are estimates at one price date, not synchronized filing valuations. Not investment advice.
Token vs underlying stock
Current comparison for NVDA. Historical observations may postdate this article.
Split-adjusted regular-session stock closes from the existing Gloria shared history, paired only with an observed token price within 45 minutes of 16:00 New York time. Up to 60 matched sessions. No interpolation or missing-date fill. Weekends and known early closes are omitted. Token units are not adjusted for issuer multipliers or dividend treatment. This compares quoted prices, not fair value, executable premiums or arbitrage returns. Solid line: token. Dashed line: stock. Exact quote times and values appear below. Historical observations. Retrieval refers to the token source. Token quote times use UTC. The fixed cohort shows its oldest member fetch.
Nvidia token vs Nvidia stock: exact source values
Date (UTC)
Token (USD)
Stock close (USD)
Token quote (UTC)
2026-08-04
212.33
211.94
2026-08-04 20:00
2026-08-05
219.87
219.22
2026-08-05 20:00
2026-08-06
219.15
218.99
2026-08-06 20:00
2026-08-07
223.93
223.96
2026-08-07 20:00
2026-08-10
217.66
217.55
2026-08-10 20:00
2026-08-11
217.53
217.50
2026-08-11 20:00
2026-08-12
224.12
224.09
2026-08-12 20:00
2026-08-13
225.42
225.30
2026-08-13 20:00
2026-08-14
225.34
225.16
2026-08-14 20:00
2026-08-17
225.13
225.01
2026-08-17 20:00
2026-08-18
219.70
219.74
2026-08-18 20:00
2026-08-19
217.76
217.56
2026-08-19 20:00
2026-08-20
216.79
216.85
2026-08-20 20:00
2026-08-21
214.85
214.72
2026-08-21 20:00
2026-08-24
208.75
208.48
2026-08-24 20:00
2026-08-25
213.16
213.05
2026-08-25 20:00
2026-08-26
210.06
209.66
2026-08-26 20:00
2026-08-27
227.96
227.98
2026-08-27 20:00
2026-08-28
217.74
217.55
2026-08-28 20:00
2026-08-31
220.91
220.78
2026-08-31 20:00
2026-09-01
217.58
217.44
2026-09-01 20:00
2026-09-02
224.46
224.41
2026-09-02 20:00
2026-09-03
228.90
228.45
2026-09-03 20:00
2026-09-04
230.35
230.36
2026-09-04 20:00
2026-09-08
225.69
225.73
2026-09-08 20:00
2026-09-09
223.89
223.67
2026-09-09 20:00
2026-09-10
218.70
218.36
2026-09-10 20:00
2026-09-11
218.92
218.29
2026-09-11 20:00
2026-09-14
211.47
210.96
2026-09-14 20:00
2026-09-15
212.34
212.17
2026-09-15 20:00
2026-09-16
214.25
213.90
2026-09-16 20:00
2026-09-17
219.68
219.34
2026-09-17 20:00
2026-09-18
222.24
222.27
2026-09-18 20:00
2026-09-21
227.69
227.38
2026-09-21 20:00
2026-09-22
229.20
228.87
2026-09-22 20:00
2026-09-23
225.44
225.51
2026-09-23 20:00
2026-09-24
224.87
224.58
2026-09-24 20:00
2026-09-25
225.29
225.07
2026-09-25 20:00
2026-09-28
228.97
228.86
2026-09-28 20:00
2026-09-29
227.95
227.21
2026-09-29 20:00
2026-09-30
229.85
228.38
2026-09-30 20:00
2026-10-01
231.18
230.86
2026-10-01 20:00
2026-10-02
234.38
233.95
2026-10-02 20:00
2026-10-05
239.30
238.90
2026-10-05 20:00
2026-10-06
239.71
239.24
2026-10-06 20:00
2026-10-07
237.80
237.47
2026-10-07 20:00
2026-10-08
230.81
230.48
2026-10-08 20:00
2026-10-09
229.70
229.28
2026-10-09 20:00
2026-10-12
226.87
226.32
2026-10-12 20:00
2026-10-13
228.73
228.52
2026-10-13 20:00
2026-10-14
221.56
221.30
2026-10-14 20:00
2026-10-15
217.48
217.23
2026-10-15 20:00
2026-10-16
214.56
214.13
2026-10-16 20:00
2026-10-19
217.41
217.09
2026-10-19 20:00
2026-10-20
216.69
216.47
2026-10-20 20:00
2026-10-21
222.20
221.97
2026-10-21 20:00
2026-10-22
212.42
212.21
2026-10-22 20:00
2026-10-23
211.27
210.96
2026-10-23 20:00
2026-10-26
216.15
216.00
2026-10-26 20:00
2026-10-27
218.06
217.94
2026-10-27 20:00
Stock history: Gloria · Retrieved Oct 28, 00:31 UTC. Token history: CoinGecko NVDAx.
Quoted token and share units can have different rights, multipliers and dividend treatment. This is not an executable premium or arbitrage signal.
Nvidia just dropped storage performance benchmarks for its Vera CPU that read like a flex. The chip, embedded inside the BlueField-4 STX storage processor, clocked up to 3.67 times higher throughput on CRC32C integrity checks compared to a typical x86 CPU.
The benchmarks, published on August 3, cover the exact workloads that define modern AI-native storage: encryption, compression, integrity verification, and data recovery.
The numbers behind the claim
CRC32C integrity checking grabbed the headline number at 3.67x, but the rest of the benchmark suite tells a broader story.
Data compression speeds came in at 3.29 times faster than the x86 baseline. Reed-Solomon recovery, the math that reconstructs lost data across storage arrays, hit 3.26x. Multi-stage pipeline performance landed at 3.21x.
AES-128 encryption showed a 1.43x improvement, while decompression clocked 1.72x faster throughput.
In English: the tasks where raw parallel throughput matters most saw the biggest gains. The tasks that lean on specialized instruction sets, like AES encryption where x86 chips have dedicated hardware accelerators baked in, showed smaller but still meaningful advantages.
AI, tech, and the markets they move—in one daily briefing.
Daily. Free. Join 34,000+ readers across crypto, finance, and policy.
Vera runs 88 custom Nvidia Olympus cores built on the Armv9.2 architecture, delivering 176 threads total.
The chip uses SOCAMM2 LPDDR5X memory capable of aggregate bandwidth up to 1.2 TB/s. It also features what Nvidia calls a Scalable Coherency Fabric providing 3.4 TB/s of core-to-core bisection bandwidth.
The dual-role aspect is worth noting too. Vera isn’t just a storage accelerator chip. It’s designed to serve as the host CPU for Nvidia’s Rubin GPU platforms, sitting at the center of what Nvidia calls its “unified AI factory stack.”
The commercial launch is scheduled for fall 2026.
Why this matters for the market
The risk, as always with vendor benchmarks, is that real-world performance rarely matches the controlled conditions of a product launch. The 3.67x headline number is measured against “a typical x86 CPU,” and Nvidia hasn’t specified exactly which x86 chip served as the comparison point.
Disclosure: This article was edited by Editorial Team. For more information on how we create and review content, see our Editorial Policy.
