+65.5% (FY ended 2026-01-25 vs FY ended 2025-01-26) 10-K
Annual net income
120,067,000,000 USD (FY ended 2026-01-25, attributable to the company) 10-K
Annual operating margin
60.4% (FY ended 2026-01-25)
Forward P/E
Unavailable: no dated forecast source
Gloria daily close for session Oct 28, 2026. Market cap and trailing P/E use this close with the SEC share total and trailing diluted earnings, each dated next to its figure. Annual revenue, revenue growth, net income and margin show their own fiscal period and link the 10-K. Current context may postdate this article.
4,335,000,000FY ended 2025-12-27, attributable to the company · 10-K
10.7%FY ended 2025-12-27
Missing figures stay unavailable. Forward P/E requires a dated source. Annual revenue, revenue growth, net income and margin come from each company's own 10-K, in US dollars, and each row shows that fiscal year. Revenue growth compares the fiscal year with the prior year stated in the same 10-K. Net income is the full year amount attributable to the company, or available to common stockholders where the filing states only that, or consolidated net income. Each row names its basis. Trailing P/E reads "Not meaningful" when the dated trailing diluted EPS is a loss or zero. An operating margin appears only when the filing states both the operating income and the revenue for the same year.
Sources: SEC filings, Gloria daily closes and CoinGecko. Oldest record refresh: Oct 28, 2026, 5:46 PM EDT. Refresh is not a price or filing date. Each row shows its price date and its annual fiscal period. Peers use industry code and company size, or editorial selection. Market cap multiplies that row price by the company share total the latest SEC filing states for every share class together. Trailing P/E divides it by trailing diluted earnings from SEC filings. Rolled earnings per share are approximate because share counts can change between periods. Both appear only when the SEC data carries its date, so they are estimates at one price date, not synchronized filing valuations. Not investment advice.
Token vs underlying stock
Current comparison for NVDA. Historical observations may postdate this article.
Split-adjusted regular-session stock closes from the existing Gloria shared history, paired only with an observed token price within 45 minutes of 16:00 New York time. Up to 60 matched sessions. No interpolation or missing-date fill. Weekends and known early closes are omitted. Token units are not adjusted for issuer multipliers or dividend treatment. This compares quoted prices, not fair value, executable premiums or arbitrage returns. Solid line: token. Dashed line: stock. Exact quote times and values appear below. Historical observations. Retrieval refers to the token source. Token quote times use UTC. The fixed cohort shows its oldest member fetch.
Nvidia token vs Nvidia stock: exact source values
Date (UTC)
Token (USD)
Stock close (USD)
Token quote (UTC)
2026-08-05
219.87
219.22
2026-08-05 20:00
2026-08-06
219.15
218.99
2026-08-06 20:00
2026-08-07
223.93
223.96
2026-08-07 20:00
2026-08-10
217.66
217.55
2026-08-10 20:00
2026-08-11
217.53
217.50
2026-08-11 20:00
2026-08-12
224.12
224.09
2026-08-12 20:00
2026-08-13
225.42
225.30
2026-08-13 20:00
2026-08-14
225.34
225.16
2026-08-14 20:00
2026-08-17
225.13
225.01
2026-08-17 20:00
2026-08-18
219.70
219.74
2026-08-18 20:00
2026-08-19
217.76
217.56
2026-08-19 20:00
2026-08-20
216.79
216.85
2026-08-20 20:00
2026-08-21
214.85
214.72
2026-08-21 20:00
2026-08-24
208.75
208.48
2026-08-24 20:00
2026-08-25
213.16
213.05
2026-08-25 20:00
2026-08-26
210.06
209.66
2026-08-26 20:00
2026-08-27
227.96
227.98
2026-08-27 20:00
2026-08-28
217.74
217.55
2026-08-28 20:00
2026-08-31
220.91
220.78
2026-08-31 20:00
2026-09-01
217.58
217.44
2026-09-01 20:00
2026-09-02
224.46
224.41
2026-09-02 20:00
2026-09-03
228.90
228.45
2026-09-03 20:00
2026-09-04
230.35
230.36
2026-09-04 20:00
2026-09-08
225.69
225.73
2026-09-08 20:00
2026-09-09
223.89
223.67
2026-09-09 20:00
2026-09-10
218.70
218.36
2026-09-10 20:00
2026-09-11
218.92
218.29
2026-09-11 20:00
2026-09-14
211.47
210.96
2026-09-14 20:00
2026-09-15
212.34
212.17
2026-09-15 20:00
2026-09-16
214.25
213.90
2026-09-16 20:00
2026-09-17
219.68
219.34
2026-09-17 20:00
2026-09-18
222.24
222.27
2026-09-18 20:00
2026-09-21
227.69
227.38
2026-09-21 20:00
2026-09-22
229.20
228.87
2026-09-22 20:00
2026-09-23
225.44
225.51
2026-09-23 20:00
2026-09-24
224.87
224.58
2026-09-24 20:00
2026-09-25
225.29
225.07
2026-09-25 20:00
2026-09-28
228.97
228.86
2026-09-28 20:00
2026-09-29
227.95
227.21
2026-09-29 20:00
2026-09-30
229.85
228.38
2026-09-30 20:00
2026-10-01
231.18
230.86
2026-10-01 20:00
2026-10-02
234.38
233.95
2026-10-02 20:00
2026-10-05
239.30
238.90
2026-10-05 20:00
2026-10-06
239.71
239.24
2026-10-06 20:00
2026-10-07
237.80
237.47
2026-10-07 20:00
2026-10-08
230.81
230.48
2026-10-08 20:00
2026-10-09
229.70
229.28
2026-10-09 20:00
2026-10-12
226.87
226.32
2026-10-12 20:00
2026-10-13
228.73
228.52
2026-10-13 20:00
2026-10-14
221.56
221.30
2026-10-14 20:00
2026-10-15
217.48
217.23
2026-10-15 20:00
2026-10-16
214.56
214.13
2026-10-16 20:00
2026-10-19
217.41
217.09
2026-10-19 20:00
2026-10-20
216.69
216.47
2026-10-20 20:00
2026-10-21
222.20
221.97
2026-10-21 20:00
2026-10-22
212.42
212.21
2026-10-22 20:00
2026-10-23
211.27
210.96
2026-10-23 20:00
2026-10-26
216.15
216.00
2026-10-26 20:00
2026-10-27
218.06
217.94
2026-10-27 20:00
2026-10-28
215.40
215.38
2026-10-28 20:00
Stock history: Gloria · Retrieved Oct 29, 00:31 UTC. Token history: CoinGecko NVDAx.
Quoted token and share units can have different rights, multipliers and dividend treatment. This is not an executable premium or arbitrage signal.
Asus and Poesis.ai are reportedly joining forces to build autonomous trading agents, combining Asus’s hardware muscle with Poesis’s AI-driven financial modeling. The systems would leverage Nvidia technology to power agents that can analyze, decide, and execute trades without a human touching the wheel.
What Poesis brings to the table
Poesis.ai is an AI-driven investment firm founded by Alex Popa with a fairly ambitious mission: building what it calls a “world model for finance.” Think of it as training an AI not just to read market data, but to understand how markets actually work, then letting it make decisions in real time.
The firm’s chief scientist, Charles Elkan, previously held roles at Goldman Sachs and Amazon.
Poesis’s approach centers on modular AI systems designed specifically for financial applications. Rather than one monolithic model trying to do everything, the architecture breaks trading intelligence into specialized components that can be updated and improved independently. The goal is a self-improving system that gets better at live market operations over time, not just backtesting against historical data.
AI, tech, and the markets they move—in one daily briefing.
Daily. Free. Join 34,000+ readers across crypto, finance, and policy.
On the hardware side, Asus has been aggressively expanding its AI infrastructure portfolio through a deepening collaboration with Nvidia. The company has developed multiple server platforms optimized for AI workloads, including the XA P2N-E2 system built on Nvidia’s Vera CPUs.
Nvidia itself has been pushing hard into agentic AI for finance. At GTC 2026, the chipmaker demonstrated multi-agent AI trading systems that integrate various data sources, including sentiment analysis, for real-time market strategy execution. The demo showed multiple AI agents working in concert: one monitoring news feeds, another tracking price movements, a third managing risk parameters, all coordinating to execute trades.
What traders should watch
There’s also the regulatory dimension. Financial regulators have been increasingly focused on AI-driven trading systems, particularly around questions of accountability when an autonomous agent makes a bad trade. Who’s responsible when the self-driving trader crashes: the hardware maker, the software developer, or the firm that deployed it?
Disclosure: This article was edited by Editorial Team. For more information on how we create and review content, see our Editorial Policy.
