AWS rolls out a physical AI toolchain for robots and autonomous machines
Amazon official logo (public domain, Wikimedia Commons) — CryptoBriefing brand treatment
Amazon Web Services has packaged reference architectures, Terraform code and NVIDIA integrations into a GitHub toolkit for teams building AI that operates in the real world
NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) price
Full chart and statsLoading chart…
- Last close
- $218
- Close-to-close change
- +0.9%
- Market cap
- $5.3T (shares as of 2026-08-21)
- P/E (trailing)
- 27.6 (EPS to 2026-07-26)
- Annual revenue
- $215.9B USD (FY ended 2026-01-25) 10-K
- Annual revenue growth
- +65.5% (FY ended 2026-01-25 vs FY ended 2025-01-26) 10-K
- Annual net income
- 120,067,000,000 USD (FY ended 2026-01-25, attributable to the company) 10-K
- Annual operating margin
- 60.4% (FY ended 2026-01-25)
- Forward P/E
- Unavailable: no dated forecast source
Gloria daily close for session Oct 27, 2026. Market cap and trailing P/E use this close with the SEC share total and trailing diluted earnings, each dated next to its figure. Annual revenue, revenue growth, net income and margin show their own fiscal period and link the 10-K. Current context may postdate this article.
NVIDIA Corporation and its peers
| Company | Price | Market cap | P/E (trailing) | Forward P/E | Annual revenue (USD) | Annual revenue growth | Annual net income (USD) | Operating margin |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
$218 | $5.3T | 27.6 | Unavailable | $215.9BFY ended 2026-01-25 · 10-K | +65.5%FY ended 2026-01-25 vs 2025-01-26 · 10-K | 120,067,000,000FY ended 2026-01-25, attributable to the company · 10-K | 60.4%FY ended 2026-01-25 |
|
|
$342 | $1.6T | 43.7 | Unavailable | $63.9BFY ended 2025-11-02 · 10-K | +23.9%FY ended 2025-11-02 vs 2024-11-03 · 10-K | 23,126,000,000FY ended 2025-11-02, consolidated · 10-K | 39.9%FY ended 2025-11-02 |
|
|
$929 | $1.1T | 12.5 | Unavailable | $133.2BFY ended 2026-09-03 · 10-K | +256.3%FY ended 2026-09-03 vs 2025-08-28 · 10-K | 84,969,000,000FY ended 2026-09-03, attributable to the company · 10-K | 74.6%FY ended 2026-09-03 |
|
|
$560 | $914.6B | 143.7 | Unavailable | $34.6BFY ended 2025-12-27 · 10-K | +34.3%FY ended 2025-12-27 vs 2024-12-28 · 10-K | 4,335,000,000FY ended 2025-12-27, attributable to the company · 10-K | 10.7%FY ended 2025-12-27 |
Missing figures stay unavailable. Forward P/E requires a dated source. Annual revenue, revenue growth, net income and margin come from each company's own 10-K, in US dollars, and each row shows that fiscal year. Revenue growth compares the fiscal year with the prior year stated in the same 10-K. Net income is the full year amount attributable to the company, or available to common stockholders where the filing states only that, or consolidated net income. Each row names its basis. Trailing P/E reads "Not meaningful" when the dated trailing diluted EPS is a loss or zero. An operating margin appears only when the filing states both the operating income and the revenue for the same year.
Sources: SEC filings, Gloria daily closes and CoinGecko. Oldest record refresh: Oct 27, 2026, 9:41 PM EDT. Refresh is not a price or filing date. Each row shows its price date and its annual fiscal period. Peers use industry code and company size, or editorial selection. Market cap multiplies that row price by the company share total the latest SEC filing states for every share class together. Trailing P/E divides it by trailing diluted earnings from SEC filings. Rolled earnings per share are approximate because share counts can change between periods. Both appear only when the SEC data carries its date, so they are estimates at one price date, not synchronized filing valuations. Not investment advice.
Token vs underlying stock
Current comparison for NVDA. Historical observations may postdate this article.
NVDAx token unit vs NVDA share · USD
+2.7% over displayed period
● NVDAx token┄ NVDA stock: $217.94
Source: CoinGecko + Gloria · Retrieved Oct 28, 06:38 UTC
Methodology and data
Split-adjusted regular-session stock closes from the existing Gloria shared history, paired only with an observed token price within 45 minutes of 16:00 New York time. Up to 60 matched sessions. No interpolation or missing-date fill. Weekends and known early closes are omitted. Token units are not adjusted for issuer multipliers or dividend treatment. This compares quoted prices, not fair value, executable premiums or arbitrage returns. Solid line: token. Dashed line: stock. Exact quote times and values appear below. Historical observations. Retrieval refers to the token source. Token quote times use UTC. The fixed cohort shows its oldest member fetch.
| Date (UTC) | Token (USD) | Stock close (USD) | Token quote (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-08-04 | 212.33 | 211.94 | 2026-08-04 20:00 |
| 2026-08-05 | 219.87 | 219.22 | 2026-08-05 20:00 |
| 2026-08-06 | 219.15 | 218.99 | 2026-08-06 20:00 |
| 2026-08-07 | 223.93 | 223.96 | 2026-08-07 20:00 |
| 2026-08-10 | 217.66 | 217.55 | 2026-08-10 20:00 |
| 2026-08-11 | 217.53 | 217.50 | 2026-08-11 20:00 |
| 2026-08-12 | 224.12 | 224.09 | 2026-08-12 20:00 |
| 2026-08-13 | 225.42 | 225.30 | 2026-08-13 20:00 |
| 2026-08-14 | 225.34 | 225.16 | 2026-08-14 20:00 |
| 2026-08-17 | 225.13 | 225.01 | 2026-08-17 20:00 |
| 2026-08-18 | 219.70 | 219.74 | 2026-08-18 20:00 |
| 2026-08-19 | 217.76 | 217.56 | 2026-08-19 20:00 |
| 2026-08-20 | 216.79 | 216.85 | 2026-08-20 20:00 |
| 2026-08-21 | 214.85 | 214.72 | 2026-08-21 20:00 |
| 2026-08-24 | 208.75 | 208.48 | 2026-08-24 20:00 |
| 2026-08-25 | 213.16 | 213.05 | 2026-08-25 20:00 |
| 2026-08-26 | 210.06 | 209.66 | 2026-08-26 20:00 |
| 2026-08-27 | 227.96 | 227.98 | 2026-08-27 20:00 |
| 2026-08-28 | 217.74 | 217.55 | 2026-08-28 20:00 |
| 2026-08-31 | 220.91 | 220.78 | 2026-08-31 20:00 |
| 2026-09-01 | 217.58 | 217.44 | 2026-09-01 20:00 |
| 2026-09-02 | 224.46 | 224.41 | 2026-09-02 20:00 |
| 2026-09-03 | 228.90 | 228.45 | 2026-09-03 20:00 |
| 2026-09-04 | 230.35 | 230.36 | 2026-09-04 20:00 |
| 2026-09-08 | 225.69 | 225.73 | 2026-09-08 20:00 |
| 2026-09-09 | 223.89 | 223.67 | 2026-09-09 20:00 |
| 2026-09-10 | 218.70 | 218.36 | 2026-09-10 20:00 |
| 2026-09-11 | 218.92 | 218.29 | 2026-09-11 20:00 |
| 2026-09-14 | 211.47 | 210.96 | 2026-09-14 20:00 |
| 2026-09-15 | 212.34 | 212.17 | 2026-09-15 20:00 |
| 2026-09-16 | 214.25 | 213.90 | 2026-09-16 20:00 |
| 2026-09-17 | 219.68 | 219.34 | 2026-09-17 20:00 |
| 2026-09-18 | 222.24 | 222.27 | 2026-09-18 20:00 |
| 2026-09-21 | 227.69 | 227.38 | 2026-09-21 20:00 |
| 2026-09-22 | 229.20 | 228.87 | 2026-09-22 20:00 |
| 2026-09-23 | 225.44 | 225.51 | 2026-09-23 20:00 |
| 2026-09-24 | 224.87 | 224.58 | 2026-09-24 20:00 |
| 2026-09-25 | 225.29 | 225.07 | 2026-09-25 20:00 |
| 2026-09-28 | 228.97 | 228.86 | 2026-09-28 20:00 |
| 2026-09-29 | 227.95 | 227.21 | 2026-09-29 20:00 |
| 2026-09-30 | 229.85 | 228.38 | 2026-09-30 20:00 |
| 2026-10-01 | 231.18 | 230.86 | 2026-10-01 20:00 |
| 2026-10-02 | 234.38 | 233.95 | 2026-10-02 20:00 |
| 2026-10-05 | 239.30 | 238.90 | 2026-10-05 20:00 |
| 2026-10-06 | 239.71 | 239.24 | 2026-10-06 20:00 |
| 2026-10-07 | 237.80 | 237.47 | 2026-10-07 20:00 |
| 2026-10-08 | 230.81 | 230.48 | 2026-10-08 20:00 |
| 2026-10-09 | 229.70 | 229.28 | 2026-10-09 20:00 |
| 2026-10-12 | 226.87 | 226.32 | 2026-10-12 20:00 |
| 2026-10-13 | 228.73 | 228.52 | 2026-10-13 20:00 |
| 2026-10-14 | 221.56 | 221.30 | 2026-10-14 20:00 |
| 2026-10-15 | 217.48 | 217.23 | 2026-10-15 20:00 |
| 2026-10-16 | 214.56 | 214.13 | 2026-10-16 20:00 |
| 2026-10-19 | 217.41 | 217.09 | 2026-10-19 20:00 |
| 2026-10-20 | 216.69 | 216.47 | 2026-10-20 20:00 |
| 2026-10-21 | 222.20 | 221.97 | 2026-10-21 20:00 |
| 2026-10-22 | 212.42 | 212.21 | 2026-10-22 20:00 |
| 2026-10-23 | 211.27 | 210.96 | 2026-10-23 20:00 |
| 2026-10-26 | 216.15 | 216.00 | 2026-10-26 20:00 |
| 2026-10-27 | 218.06 | 217.94 | 2026-10-27 20:00 |
Stock history: Gloria · Retrieved Oct 28, 00:31 UTC. Token history: CoinGecko NVDAx.
Quoted token and share units can have different rights, multipliers and dividend treatment. This is not an executable premium or arbitrage signal.
Amazon Web Services has launched The Physical AI Toolchain on AWS, a curated toolkit for teams building robots, autonomous machines and other AI systems that operate in the physical world.
AWS announced the toolchain on X and backed it with a dedicated blog of technical posts. The toolkit lives on GitHub and leans heavily on NVIDIA’s physical AI ecosystem.
What’s actually in the box
The toolchain bundles three main ingredients: reference architectures, Infrastructure as Code templates written in Terraform, and deployment automation samples.
Infrastructure as Code means describing your servers, networks and storage in text files instead of clicking through a console. Write the setup once, and you can recreate it reliably whenever you need it.
The kit is designed to support development end to end. AWS managed services sit alongside NVIDIA tooling for synthetic data generation, model training, simulation and edge deployment.
The toolchain includes sample code for specific stages of that pipeline, including synthetic data generation and reinforcement learning training, the method where a model improves through trial, error and reward.
The price tag, itemized
AWS is publishing estimated costs for running its sample workloads. Running the GR00T full training sample costs approximately $79, according to AWS’s estimates.
AI, tech, and the markets they move—in one daily briefing.
Daily. Free. Join 34,000+ readers across crypto, finance, and policy.
The Cosmos Predict workload is estimated at around $37 per hour, running on p5.48xlarge instances on AWS.
A loop, not a straight line
The toolchain builds on AWS’s Physical AI framework, which the company unveiled in December 2025. That framework aimed to close the gap between promising research and systems that actually work in production.
AWS frames physical AI development as a continuous learning cycle with five stages: data, train, validate, deploy and feedback.
The supporting blog covers NVIDIA Cosmos 3 world models and Isaac Lab, a framework for reinforcement learning. One post explains how Cosmos 3 world models help address data scarcity in physical AI. Another walks through 3D Gaussian Splatting, a technique for reconstructing three-dimensional scenes from images.
Why data scarcity is the real villain
Every useful example of a robot grasping, walking or navigating has to be recorded, often slowly and expensively. That’s why synthetic data and simulation sit at the center of this toolchain.
World models like Cosmos 3 generate plausible simulated environments where machines can practice. Techniques like 3D Gaussian Splatting can help turn real spaces into digital ones for that practice.
What this means for the AI infrastructure race
AWS is tying its managed cloud services directly to NVIDIA’s physical AI stack rather than asking developers to stitch the two together themselves. Simulation, synthetic data generation and reinforcement learning all lean on GPU-heavy instances like the p5.48xlarge.
For robotics startups, ready-made Terraform templates and published cost estimates lower the barrier to running serious experiments, and a roughly $79 training run is an accessible starting point.
Disclosure: This article was edited by Diego Almada Lopez. For more information on how we create and review content, see our Editorial Policy.

