Intel stays on board with Elon Musk’s Terafab chip venture
The chipmaker will keep working on the Texas mega-project even after Musk revealed early talks with TSMC
Tesla Inc. (TSLA) price
Full chart and statsLoading chart…
- Last close
- $404
- Close-to-close change
- −0.8%
- Market cap
- $1.6T (shares as of 2026-10-15)
- P/E (trailing)
- 444.2 (EPS to 2026-09-30)
- Annual revenue
- $94.8B USD (FY ended 2025-12-31) 10-K
- Annual revenue growth
- −2.9% (FY ended 2025-12-31 vs FY ended 2024-12-31) 10-K
- Annual net income
- 3,794,000,000 USD (FY ended 2025-12-31, attributable to the company) 10-K
- Annual operating margin
- 4.6% (FY ended 2025-12-31)
- Forward P/E
- Unavailable: no dated forecast source
Gloria daily close for session Oct 28, 2026. Market cap and trailing P/E use this close with the SEC share total and trailing diluted earnings, each dated next to its figure. Annual revenue, revenue growth, net income and margin show their own fiscal period and link the 10-K. Current context may postdate this article.
Tesla Inc. and its peers
| Company | Price | Market cap | P/E (trailing) | Forward P/E | Annual revenue (USD) | Annual revenue growth | Annual net income (USD) | Operating margin |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
$404 | $1.6T | 444.2 | Unavailable | $94.8BFY ended 2025-12-31 · 10-K | −2.9%FY ended 2025-12-31 vs 2024-12-31 · 10-K | 3,794,000,000FY ended 2025-12-31, attributable to the company · 10-K | 4.6%FY ended 2025-12-31 |
|
|
$82 | $69.6B | 18.0 | Unavailable | $185.0BFY ended 2025-12-31 · 10-K | −1.3%FY ended 2025-12-31 vs 2024-12-31 · 10-K | 2,697,000,000FY ended 2025-12-31, attributable to the company · 10-K | 1.6%FY ended 2025-12-31 |
| F Ford Motor Co F · Price dated Oct 27, 2026 | $12 | $46.8B | Not meaningfulLoss, diluted EPS −1.87 to 2026-06-30 · SEC filing | Unavailable | $187.3BFY ended 2025-12-31 · 10-K | +1.2%FY ended 2025-12-31 vs 2024-12-31 · 10-K | −8,182,000,000FY ended 2025-12-31, available to common stockholders · 10-K | −4.9%FY ended 2025-12-31 |
| R Rivian Automotive, Inc. RIVN · Price dated Oct 27, 2026 | $12 | $16.1B | Not meaningfulLoss, diluted EPS −2.59 to 2026-06-30 · SEC filing | Unavailable | $5.4BFY ended 2025-12-31 · 10-K | +8.4%FY ended 2025-12-31 vs 2024-12-31 · 10-K | −3,646,000,000FY ended 2025-12-31, attributable to the company · 10-K | −66.5%FY ended 2025-12-31 |
Missing figures stay unavailable. Forward P/E requires a dated source. Annual revenue, revenue growth, net income and margin come from each company's own 10-K, in US dollars, and each row shows that fiscal year. Revenue growth compares the fiscal year with the prior year stated in the same 10-K. Net income is the full year amount attributable to the company, or available to common stockholders where the filing states only that, or consolidated net income. Each row names its basis. Trailing P/E reads "Not meaningful" when the dated trailing diluted EPS is a loss or zero. An operating margin appears only when the filing states both the operating income and the revenue for the same year.
Sources: SEC filings, Gloria daily closes, CoinGecko and Databento. Oldest record refresh: Oct 28, 2026, 4:31 PM EDT. Refresh is not a price or filing date. Each row shows its price date and its annual fiscal period. Peers use industry code and company size, or editorial selection. Market cap multiplies that row price by the company share total the latest SEC filing states for every share class together. Trailing P/E divides it by trailing diluted earnings from SEC filings. Rolled earnings per share are approximate because share counts can change between periods. Both appear only when the SEC data carries its date, so they are estimates at one price date, not synchronized filing valuations. Not investment advice.
Token vs underlying stock
Current comparison for TSLA. Historical observations may postdate this article.
TSLAx token unit vs TSLA share · USD
+25.7% over displayed period
● TSLAx token┄ TSLA stock: $404.22
Source: CoinGecko + Gloria · Retrieved Oct 29, 01:51 UTC
Methodology and data
Split-adjusted regular-session stock closes from the existing Gloria shared history, paired only with an observed token price within 45 minutes of 16:00 New York time. Up to 60 matched sessions. No interpolation or missing-date fill. Weekends and known early closes are omitted. Token units are not adjusted for issuer multipliers or dividend treatment. This compares quoted prices, not fair value, executable premiums or arbitrage returns. Solid line: token. Dashed line: stock. Exact quote times and values appear below. Historical observations. Retrieval refers to the token source. Token quote times use UTC. The fixed cohort shows its oldest member fetch.
| Date (UTC) | Token (USD) | Stock close (USD) | Token quote (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-08-05 | 321.77 | 321.55 | 2026-08-05 20:00 |
| 2026-08-06 | 319.34 | 319.53 | 2026-08-06 20:00 |
| 2026-08-07 | 328.56 | 328.58 | 2026-08-07 20:00 |
| 2026-08-10 | 330.41 | 330.88 | 2026-08-10 20:00 |
| 2026-08-11 | 332.57 | 332.81 | 2026-08-11 20:00 |
| 2026-08-12 | 327.33 | 327.51 | 2026-08-12 20:00 |
| 2026-08-13 | 339.84 | 339.96 | 2026-08-13 20:00 |
| 2026-08-14 | 342.19 | 342.27 | 2026-08-14 20:00 |
| 2026-08-17 | 339.31 | 339.30 | 2026-08-17 20:00 |
| 2026-08-18 | 336.76 | 336.87 | 2026-08-18 20:00 |
| 2026-08-19 | 350.81 | 351.12 | 2026-08-19 20:00 |
| 2026-08-20 | 344.93 | 345.13 | 2026-08-20 20:00 |
| 2026-08-21 | 363.21 | 362.86 | 2026-08-21 20:00 |
| 2026-08-24 | 349.40 | 348.95 | 2026-08-24 20:00 |
| 2026-08-25 | 350.44 | 350.25 | 2026-08-25 20:00 |
| 2026-08-26 | 345.96 | 345.82 | 2026-08-26 20:00 |
| 2026-08-27 | 354.49 | 354.81 | 2026-08-27 20:00 |
| 2026-08-28 | 348.43 | 348.75 | 2026-08-28 20:00 |
| 2026-08-31 | 368.11 | 367.95 | 2026-08-31 20:00 |
| 2026-09-01 | 356.26 | 356.09 | 2026-09-01 20:00 |
| 2026-09-02 | 356.40 | 357.01 | 2026-09-02 20:00 |
| 2026-09-03 | 376.26 | 376.37 | 2026-09-03 20:00 |
| 2026-09-04 | 353.98 | 354.08 | 2026-09-04 20:00 |
| 2026-09-08 | 367.67 | 368.16 | 2026-09-08 20:00 |
| 2026-09-09 | 367.89 | 367.81 | 2026-09-09 20:00 |
| 2026-09-10 | 363.21 | 363.56 | 2026-09-10 20:00 |
| 2026-09-11 | 365.20 | 365.44 | 2026-09-11 20:00 |
| 2026-09-14 | 358.97 | 358.97 | 2026-09-14 20:00 |
| 2026-09-15 | 356.15 | 356.58 | 2026-09-15 20:00 |
| 2026-09-16 | 357.92 | 358.08 | 2026-09-16 20:00 |
| 2026-09-17 | 366.16 | 366.20 | 2026-09-17 20:00 |
| 2026-09-18 | 364.26 | 364.27 | 2026-09-18 20:00 |
| 2026-09-21 | 375.33 | 375.30 | 2026-09-21 20:00 |
| 2026-09-22 | 378.85 | 378.90 | 2026-09-22 20:00 |
| 2026-09-23 | 379.78 | 380.12 | 2026-09-23 20:00 |
| 2026-09-24 | 378.18 | 377.94 | 2026-09-24 20:00 |
| 2026-09-25 | 372.41 | 372.11 | 2026-09-25 20:00 |
| 2026-09-28 | 357.86 | 357.45 | 2026-09-28 20:00 |
| 2026-09-29 | 352.87 | 352.84 | 2026-09-29 20:00 |
| 2026-09-30 | 354.55 | 354.81 | 2026-09-30 20:00 |
| 2026-10-01 | 354.60 | 354.11 | 2026-10-01 20:00 |
| 2026-10-02 | 370.48 | 370.59 | 2026-10-02 20:00 |
| 2026-10-05 | 378.53 | 378.73 | 2026-10-05 20:00 |
| 2026-10-06 | 380.33 | 380.68 | 2026-10-06 20:00 |
| 2026-10-07 | 377.65 | 377.81 | 2026-10-07 20:00 |
| 2026-10-08 | 374.64 | 375.00 | 2026-10-08 20:00 |
| 2026-10-09 | 382.68 | 382.70 | 2026-10-09 20:00 |
| 2026-10-12 | 377.87 | 378.03 | 2026-10-12 20:00 |
| 2026-10-13 | 375.78 | 375.23 | 2026-10-13 20:00 |
| 2026-10-14 | 366.65 | 367.16 | 2026-10-14 20:00 |
| 2026-10-15 | 362.70 | 362.44 | 2026-10-15 20:00 |
| 2026-10-16 | 354.41 | 354.72 | 2026-10-16 20:00 |
| 2026-10-19 | 368.02 | 368.06 | 2026-10-19 20:00 |
| 2026-10-20 | 373.65 | 373.71 | 2026-10-20 20:00 |
| 2026-10-21 | 386.28 | 386.47 | 2026-10-21 20:00 |
| 2026-10-22 | 376.50 | 374.58 | 2026-10-22 20:00 |
| 2026-10-23 | 372.40 | 372.22 | 2026-10-23 20:00 |
| 2026-10-26 | 391.19 | 391.62 | 2026-10-26 20:00 |
| 2026-10-27 | 406.70 | 407.46 | 2026-10-27 20:00 |
| 2026-10-28 | 404.39 | 404.22 | 2026-10-28 20:00 |
Stock history: Gloria · Retrieved Oct 29, 00:32 UTC. Token history: CoinGecko TSLAx.
Quoted token and share units can have different rights, multipliers and dividend treatment. This is not an executable premium or arbitrage signal.
Intel is not walking away from Elon Musk’s biggest hardware bet. The chipmaker will keep working with Musk on Terafab, his large-scale chipmaking project, according to Bloomberg.
Earlier in October, Musk revealed that he had held discussions with Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company. That left investors wondering whether Intel’s seat at the table was about to get crowded.
What Terafab is trying to build
Terafab is Musk’s attempt to manufacture ultra-high-performance chips for artificial intelligence and robotics. Three Musk companies sit behind it: Tesla, SpaceX and xAI.
The planned Texas facility targets a compute capacity of 1 terawatt annually.
The main site sits in Grimes County, Texas. Its initial planned investment exceeds $16.8 billion, with total spending potentially reaching up to $119 billion across multiple phases.
Intel joined the effort on April 7, 2026. It was the first named foundry partner, announced alongside SpaceX, xAI and Tesla.
Tesla added a technical detail later that month. During its Q1 2026 earnings call in late April, the company indicated it aims to use Intel’s 14A manufacturing process for Terafab.
Intel CEO Lip-Bu Tan met Musk face to face before the April announcement and described the engagement as “highly strategic.”
AI, tech, and the markets they move—in one daily briefing.
Daily. Free. Join 34,000+ readers across crypto, finance, and policy.
Enter TSMC
Until October 3, 2026, Intel was the only publicly named chip manufacturing partner on the project. Then Musk disclosed talks with TSMC. Those conversations have been described as preliminary and informal.
Intel’s stock price showed noticeable fluctuations after the TSMC discussions surfaced.
No specific financial commitments tied to Intel’s role have been made public, and neither has the exact scope of its participation.
What this means for Intel and the chip race
For Intel, Terafab is a high-profile customer relationship with a famously demanding buyer. Continued involvement gives the company a role in one of the most closely watched US chip projects, and a visible test case for its 14A process.
Without disclosed financial terms or a defined scope, Intel’s share of a project that could eventually reach up to $119 billion remains an open question.
There are several things worth watching from here. The first is whether Intel and the Terafab companies publish financial terms or production targets tied specifically to Intel.
The second is whether TSMC’s talks move past the preliminary stage. A formal TSMC agreement would clarify how work gets divided, and how central Intel really is.
The third is progress on the Grimes County site itself. The jump from an initial $16.8 billion-plus plan to a potential $119 billion buildout will happen in phases, and each phase will show whether the 1 terawatt ambition is moving from slide deck to construction site.
Finally, watch Tesla’s commentary on 14A. If Tesla keeps pointing to Intel’s process in future earnings calls, that is a stronger signal of Intel’s long-term role than any single headline about who Musk is talking to.
Disclosure: This article was edited by Diego Almada Lopez. For more information on how we create and review content, see our Editorial Policy.
More in Technology
See all-
Nvidia unveils DSX POD server racks to speed up AI factory buildouts
-
S&P 500 notches third straight gain as Fed holds rates steady
-
Tencent cloud chief Dowson Tong proposes AI strategy overhaul centered on businesses
-
Samsung Electronics increases foundry investment in US and South Korea
-
Samsung overtakes SK hynix in HBM revenue as HBM4 sales surge in Q3
-
OpenAI offers up to $500 in monthly API credits to ChatGPT Pro and Business subscribers

