Most Americans now see AI as bad for society and want more regulation

Most Americans now see AI as bad for society and want more regulation

A Washington Post-ABC News-Ipsos poll finds 57% view AI as a negative force and 67% say Washington isn't regulating it enough

A new Washington Post, ABC News and Ipsos poll found that 57% of US adults believe artificial intelligence is a negative influence on society. Another 67% say the federal government is not doing enough to regulate how the technology grows and develops.

What the poll found

The survey ran from October 9-13, 2026, and reached 2,545 US adults. The headline number is the 57% who think AI is bad for society overall.

Nearly one-third of respondents described AI as either “extremely” or “very” harmful.

On regulation, the frustration crosses party lines. Among Democrats, 80% said Washington is falling short on AI oversight. Independents landed at 66%. Republicans still came in at 54%.

Advertisement

The poll also found that two-thirds of Americans said they disapprove of building new data centers in the US.

Not a one-off result

A survey from the Annenberg Public Policy Center, conducted between February and March 2026, found that only 17% of respondents expected AI to have a positive impact over the next decade. By contrast, 42% predicted a negative one.

About two-thirds, 65%, said the government has done “too little” to regulate AI, and that view was held by 53% of Republicans in the survey.

A SurveyMonkey study found that 70% of participants consider AI policy a vital voting issue, while 74% support stricter regulations.

Studies from Gallup and SurveyMonkey also show majority support for safety rules even if those rules slow AI development.

The 2026 polling also shows 67% disapproving of President Trump’s handling of AI technology.

Why people are worried

The research points to three recurring concerns: job loss, safety and the sheer pace of development.

Disclosure: This article was edited by Diego Almada Lopez. For more information on how we create and review content, see our Editorial Policy.
Most Americans now see AI as bad for society and want more regulation
Most Americans now see AI as bad for society and want more regulation

A Washington Post-ABC News-Ipsos poll finds 57% view AI as a negative force and 67% say Washington isn't regulating it enough

A new Washington Post, ABC News and Ipsos poll found that 57% of US adults believe artificial intelligence is a negative influence on society. Another 67% say the federal government is not doing enough to regulate how the technology grows and develops.

What the poll found

The survey ran from October 9-13, 2026, and reached 2,545 US adults. The headline number is the 57% who think AI is bad for society overall.

Nearly one-third of respondents described AI as either “extremely” or “very” harmful.

On regulation, the frustration crosses party lines. Among Democrats, 80% said Washington is falling short on AI oversight. Independents landed at 66%. Republicans still came in at 54%.

Advertisement

The poll also found that two-thirds of Americans said they disapprove of building new data centers in the US.

Not a one-off result

A survey from the Annenberg Public Policy Center, conducted between February and March 2026, found that only 17% of respondents expected AI to have a positive impact over the next decade. By contrast, 42% predicted a negative one.

About two-thirds, 65%, said the government has done “too little” to regulate AI, and that view was held by 53% of Republicans in the survey.

A SurveyMonkey study found that 70% of participants consider AI policy a vital voting issue, while 74% support stricter regulations.

Studies from Gallup and SurveyMonkey also show majority support for safety rules even if those rules slow AI development.

The 2026 polling also shows 67% disapproving of President Trump’s handling of AI technology.

Why people are worried

The research points to three recurring concerns: job loss, safety and the sheer pace of development.

Disclosure: This article was edited by Diego Almada Lopez. For more information on how we create and review content, see our Editorial Policy.