+15.1% (FY ended 2025-12-31 vs FY ended 2024-12-31) 10-K
Annual net income
132,170,000,000 USD (FY ended 2025-12-31, attributable to the company) 10-K
Annual operating margin
32.0% (FY ended 2025-12-31)
Forward P/E
Unavailable: no dated forecast source
Gloria daily close for session Oct 29, 2026. Market cap and trailing P/E use this close with the SEC share total and trailing diluted earnings, each dated next to its figure. Annual revenue, revenue growth, net income and margin show their own fiscal period and link the 10-K. Current context may postdate this article.
Alphabet Inc. and its peers
Company
Price
Market cap
P/E (trailing)
Forward P/E
Annual revenue (USD)
Annual revenue growth
Annual net income (USD)
Operating margin
Alphabet Inc.
GOOGL · Price dated Oct 29, 2026 · tokenized GOOGLx
3,333,751,000FY ended 2025-12-31, attributable to the company · 10-K
75.8%FY ended 2025-12-31
Missing figures stay unavailable. Forward P/E requires a dated source. Annual revenue, revenue growth, net income and margin come from each company's own 10-K, in US dollars, and each row shows that fiscal year. Revenue growth compares the fiscal year with the prior year stated in the same 10-K. Net income is the full year amount attributable to the company, or available to common stockholders where the filing states only that, or consolidated net income. Each row names its basis. Trailing P/E reads "Not meaningful" when the dated trailing diluted EPS is a loss or zero. An operating margin appears only when the filing states both the operating income and the revenue for the same year.
Sources: SEC filings, Gloria daily closes and CoinGecko. Oldest record refresh: Oct 29, 2026, 12:56 PM EDT. Refresh is not a price or filing date. Each row shows its price date and its annual fiscal period. Peers use industry code and company size, or editorial selection. Market cap multiplies that row price by the company share total the latest SEC filing states for every share class together. Trailing P/E divides it by trailing diluted earnings from SEC filings. Rolled earnings per share are approximate because share counts can change between periods. Both appear only when the SEC data carries its date, so they are estimates at one price date, not synchronized filing valuations. Not investment advice.
Token vs underlying stock
Current comparison for GOOGL. Historical observations may postdate this article.
Split-adjusted regular-session stock closes from the existing Gloria shared history, paired only with an observed token price within 45 minutes of 16:00 New York time. Up to 60 matched sessions. No interpolation or missing-date fill. Weekends and known early closes are omitted. Token units are not adjusted for issuer multipliers or dividend treatment. This compares quoted prices, not fair value, executable premiums or arbitrage returns. Solid line: token. Dashed line: stock. Exact quote times and values appear below. Historical observations. Retrieval refers to the token source. Token quote times use UTC. The fixed cohort shows its oldest member fetch.
Alphabet token vs Alphabet stock: exact source values
Quoted token and share units can have different rights, multipliers and dividend treatment. This is not an executable premium or arbitrage signal.
Google just shook off a privacy lawsuit that accused it of letting its Gemini AI silently rummage through users’ Gmail, Google Chat, and Google Meet data. The case, Thele v. Google LLC, was filed in the US District Court for the Northern District of California and alleged that Google flipped a switch on its “Smart Features” setting without bothering to ask anyone first.
The lawsuit was brought by Thomas Thele on November 11, 2025, targeting what the complaint described as a stealth transition: Google allegedly enabled its AI-powered Smart Features by default on October 10, 2025, giving Gemini access to analyze private communications across its suite of products. The plaintiffs argued this violated the California Invasion of Privacy Act, or CIPA, along with other privacy statutes.
What the lawsuit actually alleged
The complaint in Thele v. Google alleged that Google exploited user inertia by toggling Smart Features to “on” without explicit consent, allegedly starting to let its AI read emails and chat messages by changing a setting most people would never notice existed.
The plaintiffs claimed this constituted unauthorized access to private communications. Under CIPA, intercepting or monitoring electronic communications without consent can carry significant legal consequences.
Gemini, Google’s flagship AI product that was rebranded from Bard in late 2023, has become increasingly embedded across Google’s ecosystem. When an AI assistant has access to your inbox, your video calls, and your chat history, the line between “helpful feature” and “surveillance tool” gets uncomfortably thin.
AI, tech, and the markets they move—in one daily briefing.
Daily. Free. Join 34,000+ readers across crypto, finance, and policy.
This isn’t the only privacy battle Google has won recently. In a related matter, Google successfully rejected a $2.36 billion disgorgement claim concerning legacy data practices on January 30, 2026.
Multiple lawsuits targeting Gemini’s functionalities have emerged across various legal domains, from privacy violations to wrongful death claims to trademark disputes.
The Thele case sits within a broader wave of litigation scrutinizing how tech companies handle user data as AI capabilities expand. As of early July 2026, there have been no public reports regarding settlements or final decisions in the Thele case.
Disclosure: This article was edited by Editorial Team. For more information on how we create and review content, see our Editorial Policy.
