Morgan Stanley forecasts cloud spending to reach $1.2T by 2027, and crypto miners are paying attention
Via 247wallst.com
The investment bank's revised hyperscaler capex projections signal a massive infrastructure buildout that increasingly overlaps with crypto mining and GPU compute markets.
Morgan Stanley (MS) price
Full chart and statsLoading chart…
- Last close
- $187
- Close-to-close change
- +1.9%
- Market cap
- $293.6B (shares as of 2026-07-31)
- P/E (trailing)
- 15.1 (EPS to 2026-06-30)
- Annual revenue
- $70.6B USD (FY ended 2025-12-31) 10-K
- Annual revenue growth
- +14.4% (FY ended 2025-12-31 vs FY ended 2024-12-31) 10-K
- Annual net income
- 16,861,000,000 USD (FY ended 2025-12-31, attributable to the company) 10-K
- Annual operating margin
- Unavailable
- Forward P/E
- Unavailable: no dated forecast source
Gloria daily close for session Oct 27, 2026. Market cap and trailing P/E use this close with the SEC share total and trailing diluted earnings, each dated next to its figure. Annual revenue, revenue growth, net income and margin show their own fiscal period and link the 10-K. Current context may postdate this article.
Morgan Stanley and its peers
| Company | Price | Market cap | P/E (trailing) | Forward P/E | Annual revenue (USD) | Annual revenue growth | Annual net income (USD) | Operating margin |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
$187 | $293.6B | 15.1 | Unavailable | $70.6BFY ended 2025-12-31 · 10-K | +14.4%FY ended 2025-12-31 vs 2024-12-31 · 10-K | 16,861,000,000FY ended 2025-12-31, attributable to the company · 10-K | Unavailable |
|
|
$912 | $265.5B | 14.1 | Unavailable | $58.3BFY ended 2025-12-31 · 10-K | +8.9%FY ended 2025-12-31 vs 2024-12-31 · 10-K | 17,176,000,000FY ended 2025-12-31, attributable to the company · 10-K | Unavailable |
|
|
$1,136 | Unavailable | 27.2 | Unavailable | $24.2BFY ended 2025-12-31 · 10-K | +18.7%FY ended 2025-12-31 vs 2024-12-31 · 10-K | 5,553,000,000FY ended 2025-12-31, attributable to the company · 10-K | 29.1%FY ended 2025-12-31 |
| T The Charles Schwab Corporation SCHW · Price dated Oct 27, 2026 | $89 | $154.4B | 16.3 | Unavailable | $23.9BFY ended 2025-12-31 · 10-K | +22.0%FY ended 2025-12-31 vs 2024-12-31 · 10-K | 8,852,000,000FY ended 2025-12-31, attributable to the company · 10-K | Unavailable |
Missing figures stay unavailable. Forward P/E requires a dated source. Annual revenue, revenue growth, net income and margin come from each company's own 10-K, in US dollars, and each row shows that fiscal year. Revenue growth compares the fiscal year with the prior year stated in the same 10-K. Net income is the full year amount attributable to the company, or available to common stockholders where the filing states only that, or consolidated net income. Each row names its basis. Trailing P/E reads "Not meaningful" when the dated trailing diluted EPS is a loss or zero. An operating margin appears only when the filing states both the operating income and the revenue for the same year.
Sources: SEC filings, Gloria daily closes and CoinGecko. Oldest record refresh: Oct 28, 2026, 5:41 PM EDT. Refresh is not a price or filing date. Each row shows its price date and its annual fiscal period. Peers use industry code and company size, or editorial selection. Market cap multiplies that row price by the company share total the latest SEC filing states for every share class together. Trailing P/E divides it by trailing diluted earnings from SEC filings. Rolled earnings per share are approximate because share counts can change between periods. Both appear only when the SEC data carries its date, so they are estimates at one price date, not synchronized filing valuations. Not investment advice.
Morgan Stanley just bumped its forecast for global hyperscaler capital expenditures to roughly $1.2 trillion by 2027, with a potential climb to $1.4 trillion by 2028. The revised projection represents a significant jump from the bank’s earlier May 2026 estimate of $951 billion, now raised to $1.116 trillion for 2027. For 2026 alone, projected spending was bumped from $765 billion to around $805 billion. Wells Fargo independently arrived at a similar conclusion, estimating that just the top four cloud providers could hit $1.1 trillion in AI infrastructure spending by 2027.
Where the money is actually going
Approximately 75% of this hyperscaler spending is expected to stem from AI infrastructure demands. About 60% of the hardware capex relevant to AI involves imported components, a detail that matters in a trade environment where tariffs and supply chain disruptions can ripple through procurement timelines.
Morgan Stanley had previously anticipated global AI spending on public cloud to reach $328 billion by 2025. The trajectory from that figure to $1.2 trillion in just two years illustrates how quickly the demand curve has steepened.
Why crypto markets should care about server farms
The GPU supply chain that AI hyperscalers are devouring is the same one that crypto miners and decentralized compute networks depend on. When Microsoft and Google are ordering Nvidia chips by the container ship, that creates pricing pressure and allocation constraints for every other buyer in the market, including companies like Marathon Digital, Riot Platforms, and Core Scientific that have been pivoting toward AI hosting as a revenue diversifier.
AI, tech, and the markets they move—in one daily briefing.
Daily. Free. Join 34,000+ readers across crypto, finance, and policy.
Core Scientific’s deal with CoreWeave is the most visible example of this convergence. Former Bitcoin miners are retrofitting facilities to serve AI workloads because the economics have shifted. Decentralized compute protocols like Render, Akash Network, and io.net are also positioned at this intersection, with a total addressable market that has just been revised upward by a few hundred billion dollars.
What this means for investors
For crypto investors, the mining sector’s ongoing pivot toward AI hosting means that companies with existing power purchase agreements and data center shells have a strategic asset. Access to cheap, reliable electricity and physical rack space is becoming a competitive moat that matters as much in AI as it does in proof-of-work mining.
Energy markets represent another variable worth watching. A trillion-dollar infrastructure buildout requires enormous amounts of electricity, and many of these data centers are being sited in the same regions where crypto miners already operate. Texas, the Nordics, and parts of the Middle East are all seeing competition for power capacity intensify.
Disclosure: This article was edited by Editorial Team. For more information on how we create and review content, see our Editorial Policy.
More in Technology
See all-
Grass founder says network can’t keep up with AI data demand
-
AA-Robotics v0.1 puts frontier language models in charge of a robot arm
-
Microsoft CFO projects about $170 billion in capital expenditures this year
-
Wall Street moves past the Fed pause and back to tech earnings and AI
-
Perplexity taps OpenAI’s gpt-live-1 to power its voice mode
-
Microsoft Foundry passes 120,000 customers as revenue more than triples

