+15.1% (FY ended 2025-12-31 vs FY ended 2024-12-31) 10-K
Annual net income
132,170,000,000 USD (FY ended 2025-12-31, attributable to the company) 10-K
Annual operating margin
32.0% (FY ended 2025-12-31)
Forward P/E
Unavailable: no dated forecast source
Gloria daily close for session Oct 29, 2026. Market cap and trailing P/E use this close with the SEC share total and trailing diluted earnings, each dated next to its figure. Annual revenue, revenue growth, net income and margin show their own fiscal period and link the 10-K. Current context may postdate this article.
Alphabet Inc. and its peers
Company
Price
Market cap
P/E (trailing)
Forward P/E
Annual revenue (USD)
Annual revenue growth
Annual net income (USD)
Operating margin
Alphabet Inc.
GOOGL · Price dated Oct 29, 2026 · tokenized GOOGLx
3,333,751,000FY ended 2025-12-31, attributable to the company · 10-K
75.8%FY ended 2025-12-31
Missing figures stay unavailable. Forward P/E requires a dated source. Annual revenue, revenue growth, net income and margin come from each company's own 10-K, in US dollars, and each row shows that fiscal year. Revenue growth compares the fiscal year with the prior year stated in the same 10-K. Net income is the full year amount attributable to the company, or available to common stockholders where the filing states only that, or consolidated net income. Each row names its basis. Trailing P/E reads "Not meaningful" when the dated trailing diluted EPS is a loss or zero. An operating margin appears only when the filing states both the operating income and the revenue for the same year.
Sources: SEC filings, Gloria daily closes and CoinGecko. Oldest record refresh: Oct 30, 2026, 9:02 AM EDT. Refresh is not a price or filing date. Each row shows its price date and its annual fiscal period. Peers use industry code and company size, or editorial selection. Market cap multiplies that row price by the company share total the latest SEC filing states for every share class together. Trailing P/E divides it by trailing diluted earnings from SEC filings. Rolled earnings per share are approximate because share counts can change between periods. Both appear only when the SEC data carries its date, so they are estimates at one price date, not synchronized filing valuations. Not investment advice.
Token vs underlying stock
Current comparison for GOOGL. Historical observations may postdate this article.
Split-adjusted regular-session stock closes from the existing Gloria shared history, paired only with an observed token price within 45 minutes of 16:00 New York time. Up to 60 matched sessions. No interpolation or missing-date fill. Weekends and known early closes are omitted. Token units are not adjusted for issuer multipliers or dividend treatment. This compares quoted prices, not fair value, executable premiums or arbitrage returns. Solid line: token. Dashed line: stock. Exact quote times and values appear below. Historical observations. Retrieval refers to the token source. Token quote times use UTC. The fixed cohort shows its oldest member fetch.
Alphabet token vs Alphabet stock: exact source values
Quoted token and share units can have different rights, multipliers and dividend treatment. This is not an executable premium or arbitrage signal.
Google appears to be building a premium upgrade inside its own vibe coding tool.
According to TestingCatalog, the company is developing a new Ultra mode for AI Studio Build. The goal is to improve app generation with more advanced tools and skills. Google has not officially announced the feature, and no launch timeline has been documented.
What TestingCatalog spotted
The report describes Ultra mode as a work-in-progress upgrade to AI Studio Build. Its stated purpose is to strengthen how the tool generates apps by giving it access to more advanced tools and skills.
Google has not publicly confirmed what those tools and skills include. Pricing, availability and eligible users are also unconfirmed.
The name invites an obvious guess. Google already sells a subscription called Google AI Ultra, and a feature with matching branding would slot neatly into that product ladder.
Recent changes to AI Studio have mostly focused on raising usage quotas for paying subscribers, not on carving out a separate mode. TestingCatalog’s report would mark a shift in that pattern if the feature ships.
You describe an app in natural language, and the tool generates a full-stack application. Under the hood, that means a React frontend running on a Node.js runtime, with Firebase integrations handling backend needs. Users get a live preview as the app takes shape.
The heavy lifting comes from Antigravity, Google’s coding agent. It supports an iterative workflow, so users can refine an app through follow-up prompts instead of starting from scratch each time.
AI, tech, and the markets they move—in one daily briefing.
Daily. Free. Join 34,000+ readers across crypto, finance, and policy.
Finished projects can sync with GitHub. Deployment options include Google’s Cloud Run.
Updates rolled out in late 2025 and through 2026 added multimodal tools and support for generating native Android apps. Users can now build certain apps without managing API keys, which removes one of the more tedious chores standing between a hobbyist and a first working project.
Google’s subscription ladder
Google currently splits AI access into tiers. The free tier offers a baseline, while AI Pro costs $19.99/month and comes with progressively higher usage limits.
Google AI Ultra sits at the top. That subscription typically runs between $99.99 and $249.99 per month.
Ultra subscribers get enhanced usage limits and access to premium models such as the Gemini Pro series and Nano Banana Pro. They also receive added functionality in AI Studio, including inside Build mode.
A dedicated Ultra mode would be a different kind of offer: a distinct capability rather than a larger bucket of usage.
What this means for developers and Google
For Google, a subscription that can cost as much as $249.99 per month needs features that feel genuinely exclusive, and quota increases only stretch so far as a selling point. A more capable version of Build reserved for premium users would give power users a concrete reason to move from free to Pro to Ultra.
Caution is warranted, though. Features spotted during development can change names, shift scope, or never ship at all, and Google has put no date on this one.
What to watch next: an official announcement from Google, any pricing or tier details, and whether Ultra mode arrives as a standalone capability or simply repackages perks that Ultra subscribers already receive.
Disclosure: This article was edited by Diego Almada Lopez. For more information on how we create and review content, see our Editorial Policy.
